As melhores ferramentas digitais para promover o engajamento na sala de aula PLA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2023.e90560Palavras-chave:
Ferramentas digitais, PLA, EngajamentoResumo
Este artigo fornece uma visão geral de ferramentas e aplicativos digitais populares para promover o engajamento na sala de aula de Português como Língua Adicional (PLA) que foi originalmente apresentada no 1o Congresso Brasileiro de Jogos Pedagógicos (Primeira Conferência Brasileira de Jogos Pedagógicos). A partir de fundamentos teóricos na aprendizagem multimídia, na teoria do fluxo e na aquisição de línguas adicionais, este artigo fornece comparações e considerações para a integração da tecnologia. Além disso, este artigo também proporciona uma série de dicas e estratégias práticas para integrar ferramentas e aplicativos digitais de forma eficaz na sala de aula de PLA. Além disso, ilumina o uso de tais ferramentas no ensino-aprendizagem línguas, considerando as perspectivas dos aprendizes.
Referências
ANDERSON, H. Blended Basic Language Courses: Design, Pedagogy, and Implementation. 18. ed. New York: Routledge, 2018. p. 1-190.
BERNAL, Ana Maria. Effects of text, audio and learner control on text-sound association and cognitive load of EFL learners. Tese de Doutorado (Tecnologias Educacionais) – University of Arizona., Tucson, p. 1-100, mai./2014. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1540519586. Access: Nov. 2019.
CÁRDENAS, S.; SÁNCHEZ, X. College students’ attitudes towards the use of Flipgrid to improve speaking skills. Alfa Publicaciones. Ambato, Ecuador, v.3, n. 3.1, p. 175-184. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.33262/ap.v3i3.1.77. Access: Nov. 2019.
CARDOSO, W. Learning a foreign language with learner response systems: The students’ perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Milton Park: Taylor Francis, v. 24, n.5, p. 393-417, dez./2011.
CHUN, D.; PLASS, J. Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, Hoboken, NJ, v. 80, n. 2, p. 183-198, Jun. 1996.
CIVELEK, M.; KARATEPE, Çiğdem. The Impact of Student-Paced Pragmatics Instruction through Nearpod on EFL Learners’ Request Performance. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, Doncaster: AIAC, v.12, n. 6, p.67-78, Dec./2021
COTTAM, M.; SAVENYE, W. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook: The Effects of Visual and Textual Annotations on Spanish Listening Comprehension, Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition, and Cognitive Load. New York: Springer, 2014. p. 83-113.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Washington: Jossey-Bass, 1975. p. 1-231.
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial, 1996. p. 107-126.
DELACRUZ, S. Using Nearpod in elementary guided reading groups. TechTrends. New York, v.58, n.5, p. 62-69, Sep./2014.
DULAY, H.; BURT, M. Remarks on creativity in language acquisition. Viewpoints on English as a second language, 2. ed. New York: Regents, 1977. p. 95-126.
JOHNSON, E. Audience response systems. In: BLEVAN, A.; INMAN, M. (org.). Curriculum-Based Library Instruction. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014. p. 61-74.
KELM, O. Technology time on task. Foreign language teaching methods. Disponível em: http://coerll.utexas.edu/methods/modules/technology/01/. Access: Jan. 2017.
KESSLER, G. Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, Hoboken, v. 51, n. 1, p. 205-218, Mar./2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318. Access: Apr. 2022.
KOLTER, S. The rise of superman: Decoding the science of ultimate human performance. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014. p. 1-256.
KRASHEN, S. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982.
LI, S.; SWANSON, P. Engaging Language Learners through Technology Integration: Theory, Applications, and Outcomes: Theory, Applications, and Outcomes. Hershey: IGI Global, 2014.
MARTIN, B.; REIGELUTH, C. Instructional-design theories and models. 2 ed. New York: Routledge, 1999. p. 485-509.
MAYER, R. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. 2. ed. New York: Cambridge, 2014.
MESKILL, C.; ANTHONY, N. Teaching languages online. 2. ed. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2015. p. 1-25.
MORENO, R.; MAYER, R. Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, v. 19, n. 3. Nova York: Springer, p. 309-326, Sep. 2007.
PLASS, J. et al. Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 19, n. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 221-243, mar/2003.
ROUSE, R. Game Design: Theory and Practice. 2. ed. Sudbury: Woodware Publishing, 2005. p. 115-121.
SAARI, J.; VARJONEN, V. Digital Games and Second Language Acquisition: The Effect of Gimkit! and Kahoot! on Upper Secondary School Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition and Motivation. Tese de Mestrado (Ensino-Aprendizagem de Línguas)-University of Turku, Turku, Finland, p. 1-103, nov./2021. Available at: https://www.utupub.fi. Acess: Dec. 2022.
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY. Center for teaching excellence : Classroom response systems. Disponível em: http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/clickers/. Acess: Jan. 2016.
WIKASONO, J. et al. The Use of H5P in Teaching English. The First International Conference on Social Science, Humanity, and Public Health. Dordrecht, p. 227-230, jan./2021.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os trabalhos publicados passam a ser de direito da Revista Fórum Linguístico, ficando sua reimpressão, total ou parcial, sujeita à autorização expressa da Comissão Editorial da revista. Deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original.
Esta publicação está regida por uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
