The Best Digital Tools to Foster Engagement in the PLA Classroom

Rachel Mamiya Hernandez

doi:10.5007/1984-8412.2023.e90560

Autores/as

Rachel Mamiya Hernandez University of Hawaii at Manoa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2023.e90560

Palabras clave:

Herramientas digitales, PLA, Involucración cognitiva

Resumen

Este artículo ofrece una descripción general de herramientas y aplicaciones digitales populares para fomentar la participación y la involucración cognitiva en el aula de portugués como lengua adicional (PLA) que se presentó originalmente en el 1o Congreso Brasileiro de Jogos Pedagógicos (Primera Conferencia Brasileña sobre Juegos Pedagógicos). A partir de los fundamentos teóricos del aprendizaje multimedia, la teoría del flujo y la adquisición de lenguas no maternas, este artículo proporciona comparaciones y consideraciones para integrar la tecnología. Además, este artículo también proporciona una serie de consejos prácticos y estrategias para integrar herramientas y aplicaciones digitales de manera efectiva en el aula de PLA. También, ilumina el uso de tales herramientas en el aula de lenguas al considerar perspectivas de los aprendices.

Citas

ANDERSON, H. Blended Basic Language Courses: Design, Pedagogy, and Implementation. 18. ed. New York: Routledge, 2018. p. 1-190.

BERNAL, Ana Maria. Effects of text, audio and learner control on text-sound association and cognitive load of EFL learners. Tese de Doutorado (Tecnologias Educacionais) – University of Arizona., Tucson, p. 1-100, mai./2014. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1540519586. Access: Nov. 2019.

CÁRDENAS, S.; SÁNCHEZ, X. College students’ attitudes towards the use of Flipgrid to improve speaking skills. Alfa Publicaciones. Ambato, Ecuador, v.3, n. 3.1, p. 175-184. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.33262/ap.v3i3.1.77. Access: Nov. 2019.

CARDOSO, W. Learning a foreign language with learner response systems: The students’ perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Milton Park: Taylor Francis, v. 24, n.5, p. 393-417, dez./2011.

CHUN, D.; PLASS, J. Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, Hoboken, NJ, v. 80, n. 2, p. 183-198, Jun. 1996.

CIVELEK, M.; KARATEPE, Çiğdem. The Impact of Student-Paced Pragmatics Instruction through Nearpod on EFL Learners’ Request Performance. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, Doncaster: AIAC, v.12, n. 6, p.67-78, Dec./2021

COTTAM, M.; SAVENYE, W. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook: The Effects of Visual and Textual Annotations on Spanish Listening Comprehension, Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition, and Cognitive Load. New York: Springer, 2014. p. 83-113.

CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. Washington: Jossey-Bass, 1975. p. 1-231.

CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial, 1996. p. 107-126.

DELACRUZ, S. Using Nearpod in elementary guided reading groups. TechTrends. New York, v.58, n.5, p. 62-69, Sep./2014.

DULAY, H.; BURT, M. Remarks on creativity in language acquisition. Viewpoints on English as a second language, 2. ed. New York: Regents, 1977. p. 95-126.

JOHNSON, E. Audience response systems. In: BLEVAN, A.; INMAN, M. (org.). Curriculum-Based Library Instruction. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014. p. 61-74.

KELM, O. Technology time on task. Foreign language teaching methods. Disponível em: http://coerll.utexas.edu/methods/modules/technology/01/. Access: Jan. 2017.

KESSLER, G. Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, Hoboken, v. 51, n. 1, p. 205-218, Mar./2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318. Access: Apr. 2022.

KOLTER, S. The rise of superman: Decoding the science of ultimate human performance. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014. p. 1-256.

KRASHEN, S. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982.

LI, S.; SWANSON, P. Engaging Language Learners through Technology Integration: Theory, Applications, and Outcomes: Theory, Applications, and Outcomes. Hershey: IGI Global, 2014.

MARTIN, B.; REIGELUTH, C. Instructional-design theories and models. 2 ed. New York: Routledge, 1999. p. 485-509.

MAYER, R. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. 2. ed. New York: Cambridge, 2014.

MESKILL, C.; ANTHONY, N. Teaching languages online. 2. ed. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2015. p. 1-25.

MORENO, R.; MAYER, R. Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, v. 19, n. 3. Nova York: Springer, p. 309-326, Sep. 2007.

PLASS, J. et al. Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 19, n. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, p. 221-243, mar/2003.

ROUSE, R. Game Design: Theory and Practice. 2. ed. Sudbury: Woodware Publishing, 2005. p. 115-121.

SAARI, J.; VARJONEN, V. Digital Games and Second Language Acquisition: The Effect of Gimkit! and Kahoot! on Upper Secondary School Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition and Motivation. Tese de Mestrado (Ensino-Aprendizagem de Línguas)-University of Turku, Turku, Finland, p. 1-103, nov./2021. Available at: https://www.utupub.fi. Acess: Dec. 2022.

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY. Center for teaching excellence : Classroom response systems. Disponível em: http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/clickers/. Acess: Jan. 2016.

WIKASONO, J. et al. The Use of H5P in Teaching English. The First International Conference on Social Science, Humanity, and Public Health. Dordrecht, p. 227-230, jan./2021.