Notes about the possibility of a work in epistemological carrefour between the folk linguistics and discourse studies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2019v16n4p4285

Abstract

This paper is strongly supported by Marie-Anne Paveau’s (2008) thesis when she says that the approaches of folk linguistics and language sciences in general are anti-discriminatory, that is, the linguistic practices of the profane speakers, the non-linguists, even those  from a more prescriptive nature, are perfectly integrable to the linguistic analyzes proposed by the linguists. We discursively analyzed in a non-exhaustive way  a study in popular linguistics that circulates in the Brazilian context, namely: The Aurelia Dictionary: The Dictionary of the Sharp Language, published in 2006, by Editora Bispa, authored by the journalists Victor Ângelo Scippe and Fred Libi.

Author Biographies

Roberto Leiser Baronas, Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCAR

Doutor em Linguística e Língua Portuguesa e Professor No Departamento de Letras e no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da UFSCAR.

Tamires Bonani Conti, Universidade Federal de São Carlos – UFSCar/PG e FAPESP

Doutoranda no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da UFSCAR e Bolsista da Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo – FAPESP, processo número 2018/05272-1.

References

MAINGUENEAU, Dominique. Gênese dos discursos. Trad. Sírio Possenti. Curitiba: Criar, 2005 [1984].

_____. Ethos, cenografia e incorporação In: AMOSSY, R. (org.). Imagens de si no discurso Trad. Ferreira, Komesu e Possenti. São Paulo: Contexto, 2005b [1999], pp. 69-92.

_____. Discours, intertextualité, interlangue. In : Champs du signe n. 13/14, 2002, pp.197-210. (aqui, consultamos uma versão mimeo sem paginação).

_____. L'analyse des discours constituants. In: Fundamentos e dimensões da análise do discurso, MARI, H.et al.(eds). Belo Horizonte, 1999, pp.45-59.

_____. O contexto da obra literária – enunciação, escritor, sociedade. Marina Appenzeller. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1995 [1993].

NIEDZIELSKI, N.; PRESTON, D. Folk Linguistics. With a new preface. Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter, 2003 [2000].

PAVEAU, M.-A. La « richesse lexicale », entre apprentissage et acculturation. In: Le Français aujourdhui, 131, 2000, p. 19-30.

_____. Linguistique populaire et enseignement de lalangue: des catégories communes. In: Le Français aujourd’hui, 151, 2005, p. 95-107.

_____. Les prédiscours. Sens, mémoire, cognition. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle, 2006.

_____. Les normes perceptives de la linguistique populaire. In: Langage et société, 121, Les normes pratiques, 2007, p. 93-109.

_____. Le parler des classes dominantes, objet linguistique mentin correct? Dialectologie perceptive et linguistique populaire. In: Études de linguistique appliquée, 150, 2008a, p. 137-156.

_____. La langue sans classes de la grammaire scolaire. In: DAVID, J.; BERTUCCI, M.-M. (orgs.). Le français aujourd’hui, 162, Descriptions de la langue et enseignement, 2008b, p. 29-40.

_____. “Les non-linguistes font-ils de la linguistique ?”, Pratiques [En ligne], 139-140 | 2008, mis en ligne le 15 décembre 2008, consulté le 19 avril 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/pratiques/1200 ; DOI : 10.4000/pratiques.1200

_____. Quand Marie-Chantaldit merde: sentiment linguistique et normes perceptives dans la haute société. In: Sentiment linguistique et discours spontanés sur lelexique, coleção Recherches Linguistiques. Metz, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 4 (2019)

Section

Dossier

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Fórum Linguístico

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Rights including those in copyright in the content of the published works are owned by Revista Forum Linguistico. Complete or parcial reprint should be authorized by the Editorial Board of the Journal.  In case of authorization, the source of the original publication must be stated.