Polybius, Rome, and the Reúblican tradition of Political thinking.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7984.2025.e103095Keywords:
RepublicanismAbstract
Since the renewed interest of political scientists in the institutional and intellectual reality of ancient Rome, political theory has drawn on the Roman heritage to address its central questions. This article presents two fundamental arguments within this debate. First, it highlights the singular relevance of the polybian idea of mixed constitution for the republican tradition of political thought. Second, it addresses an element of the Polybius’ theorization that may be underestimated in the studies concerned with this intellectual heritage: the constitution praised by Polybius does not characterize the entire period following the end of monarchical rule in Rome. By mobilizing ancient sources and contemporary commentators, the article aims to demonstrate that Polybius was reflecting on a specific and relatively short period of Rome’s institutional experience. This contributes to a clearer understanding of the contours of a supposed republican tradition of political thought.
References
ARAUJO, C. A forma da república: da constituição mista ao Estado. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2013.
BIGNOTTO, N. Origens do Republicanismo Moderno. Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG, 2001.
CARDOSO, S. Retorno ao republicanismo. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2004.
CICERO, M. T. Tratado da República. Lisboa: Círculo de Leitores e Temas e Debates, 2008.
COLOGNESI, L. C. Law and power in the making of the roman commonwealth. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2018.
FLOWER, H. I. Roman Republics. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2010.
FONTANA, B. (org.). The Invention of the Modern Republic. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
HÖLKESKAMP, K. J. Reconstructing the Roman Republic: an ancient political culture and modern research. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 2010.
LINTOTT, A. The constitution of the roman republic. Oxford University Press: New York, 1999.
LÍVIO. História de Roma. São Paulo: Paumape, 1989.
MAQUIAVEL, N. Comentários sobre a primeira década de Tito Lívio. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007
MCCORMICK, J. Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism. American Political Science Review, v. 95, n. 2, p. 297-313, 2001.
. Machiavelli against Republicanism: on the Cambridge School’s ‘Guicciardini’ Moments. Political Theory, v. 31, n. 5, p. 615-43, 2003.
. Machiavellian Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
POLÍBIOS. História. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília. 1996.
SEBASTIANI, B. B. Bélica lição polibiana. Tese (Doutorado em História Social). Universidade de São Paulo, 2006
Silva, R. Maquiavel e o conceito de liberdade em três vertentes do novo republicanismo. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 25, p. 37-58, 2010.
. Republicanismo neo-romano e democracia contestatória. Revista de Sociologia e Política, v. 19, p. 35-51, 2011.
STRAUMANN, B. Crisis and Constitutionalism: roman political thought from the fall of the republic to the age of revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
URBINATI, N. Republicanism: democratic or popular?, The Good Society, v. 20, n. 2, p. 157-169, 2011.
. Competing for Liberty: the republican critique of democracy, American Political Science Review, v. 106, n. 3, p. 607-621, 2012.
. Democracy Disfigured - opinion, truth, and the people. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.
WALBANK, F.W. Polybius on the Roman Constitution. The Classical Quarterly, v. 37, n. 3/4, p. 73-89, 1943.
. Polybius, Rome and the hellenistic world: essays and reflections. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tiago Bahia Losso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and publishing rights to their works without restrictions.
By submitting their manuscripts, authors grant Revista Política & Sociedade the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and the original publication in this journal.
Authors are also permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work in this journal (for example, depositing it in an institutional repository, posting it on a personal website, publishing translations, or including it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the original publication in Revista Política & Sociedade are properly acknowledged.
