Patricia Churchland and Adela Cortina: two rival versions of neuroethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2026.e104212Keywords:
Neuroethics, Patricia Churchland, Adela Cortina, Attachment, Cordial ReasonAbstract
This article aims to confront two conceptions of neuroethics developed by two philosophers: Patricia Churchland and Adela Cortina. Firstly, Churchland's neuroethical proposal, of a naturalistic nature, is presented. Churchland argues that morality derives from the social feelings developed by animals and related to care and cooperation with others. Against this approach, Cortina's neuroethical theory is presented. The Spanish philosopher proposes a conception of neuroethics that integrates emotion within rationality, in light of the discoveries made by neuroscience. To achieve this, Cortina defends an ethic of cordial reason and a communicative democracy. Furthermore, Cortina criticizes reductionism and the methodological errors of neuroscience in its attempt to explain the moral phenomenon. Finally, Cortina's criticisms of Churchland's naturalistic approach are analyzed.
References
Alexander, R. 1987. The biology of moral systems. New York: Routledge.
Bonete, E. 2010. Neuroética práctica. Bilbao: Desclee de Brouwer.
Churchland, P. S. 1986. Neurophilosophy: toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Churchland, P. S. 1991. Our Brains, Our selves: Reflections on Neuroethical Questions. In: R. J. Roy; B. E. Wynne; R. W. Old (ed.), Bioscience and Society, pp.77-96. New York: Willey & Sons.
Churchland, P. S. 2002. Brain-wise. Studies in Neurophilosophy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Churchland, P. S. 2011. Braintrust: what Neuroscience tells us about Morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Churchland, P. S. 2014. The neurobiological platform for moral values. Behavior 151: 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003144
Codina Felip, M.J. 2015. Neuroeducación en virtudes cordiales. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Cortina, A. 2007. Ética de la razón cordial. Oviedo: Nobel.
Cortina, A. 2010a. Neuroética: ¿las bases cerebrales de uma ética universal?. Isegoría 42: 129-148. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2010.i42.687
Cortina, A. 2010b. Justicia cordial. Madrid: Trotta.
Cortina, A. 2011. Neuroética y neuropolítica. Madrid: Tecnos.
Cortina, A. 2013a. Ética del discurso: ¿un marco filosófico para la neuroética?. Isegoría 48: 127-148. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2013.048.07
Cortina, A. 2013b. Para qué sirve realmente... la ética. Barcelona: Paidós.
Cortina, A. 2016. La conciencia moral desde una perspectiva neuroética. De Darwin a Kant. Pensamiento 72: 771-788. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v72.i273.y2016.001
Cortina, A. 2017. Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre. Barcelona: Paidós.
Cortina, A. & Conill, J. 2019. Bioética y neuroética. Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura 195. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-4785
Cranford, R.E. 1989. The Neurologist as Ethics Consultant and as a Member of the Institutional Ethics Committee. The Neuroethicist. Neurologic Clinics 7(4): 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8619(18)30384-0
Gazzaniga, M. 2006. El cerebro ético. Barcelona: Paidós.
Damasio, A. 2013. El error de Descartes. Barcelona: Destino.
Evers, K. 2015. Can we be epigenecally proactive?. In: T. Metzinger; J. M. Windt (eds.), Open MIND 13, pp.1-21. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group.
Gilbert, P.; Price, J.; Allan, S. 1995. Social comparison, social attractiveness and evolution: how might they be related?. New ideas in Psychology 13: 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(95)00002-X
Greene, J. 2012. Del “es” neuronal al “debe” moral: ¿cuáles son las implicaciones morales de la psicología moral neurocientífica”. In: A. Cortina (ed.), Guía Comares de neurofilosofía práctica, pp.149-158. Granada: Comares.
Habermas, J. 2006. Entre naturalismo y religión. Barcelona: Paidós.
Haidt, J. 2012. El perro emocional y su cola racional: un enfoque intuicionista social del juicio moral. In: A. Cortina (ed.), Guía Comares de neurofilosofía práctica, pp.159-215. Granada: Comares.
Haidt, J. 2019. La mente de los justos. Barcelona: Deusto.
Hauser, M.D. 2008. La mente moral. Cómo la naturaleza ha desarrollado nuestro sentido del bien y del mal. Barcelona: Paidós.
Levi, N. 2007. Neuroethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mora, F. 2007. Neurocultura. Madrid: Alianza.
Pérez Zafrilla, P. J. 2013. Implicaciones normativas de la psicología moral: Jonathan Haidt y el desconcierto moral. Daimon. Revista internacional de filosofía 59: 9-25.
Pérez Zafrilla, P. J. 2021. The dual process model of moral judgement. A divided mind or a myopic methodology?. Pensamiento 77(295): 511-521. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v77.i295.y2021.006
Pérez Zafrilla, P. J. 2022. The Emotional Dog Was a Glauconian Canine: The Reception of the Social Intuitionist Model, From the Neurocentric Paradigm to the Digital Paradigm. Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 19: 63–83. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp63-83
Pérez Zafrilla, P. J. 2025. Aporofobia en Adela Cortina: un concepto incomprendido en la academia. Logos: Revista de lingüística, filosofía y literatura 35(2).
Persson, I. & Savulescu, J. 2011. Unfit for the future. The need for moral enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pontius, A. A. 1973. Neuro-ethics of “walking” in the newborn. Perpetual and Motor Skills 37(1): 235-245. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1973.37.1.235
Richart Piqueras, A. 2018. Neuroética en perspectiva crítica: ¿es posible una naturalización de la moral desde las neurociencias?. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
Roskies, A.L. 2002. Neuroethics for the New Millenium. Neuron 35: 21-23. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00763-8
Tomasello, M. 2010. ¿Por qué cooperamos?. Madrid: Katz Editores.
Trivers, R. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology 46(1): 35-57.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pedro Jesus Perez Zafrilla

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Principia http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/index is licenced under a Creative Commons - Atribuição-Uso Não-Comercial-Não a obras derivadas 3.0 Unported.
Base available in www.periodicos.ufsc.br.
