REPRODUTIBILIDADE DA ULTRASSONOGRÁFIA COMO FERRAMENTA DE AVALIAÇÃO DO TECIDO ADIPOSO ABDOMINAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2025v27e96243Palabras clave:
Imágenes por ultrasonido, Grasa intraabdominal, Grasa subcutánea abdominalResumen
El aumento de la demanda de estrategias diagnósticas prácticas, accesibles y clínicamente relevantes en la evaluación de la adiposidad visceral ha impulsado el uso de métodos alternativos para evaluar la composición corporal. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la reproducibilidad intra e interevaluadores de la ecografía USG en la estimación del tejido adiposo abdominal, en sus compartimentos visceral (TAV) y subcutáneo (TAS). Se trata de un estudio metodológico, realizado entre 2020 y 2021, con individuos adultos, con edades comprendidas entre 20 y 59 años, de ambos sexos. El TAV y el TAS fueron evaluados por USG a través de una exploración de la región abdominal en tres sitios anatómicos abdominales. La evaluación de la reproducibilidad de las mediciones de USG mostró un alto acuerdo intra e interevaluador con Coeficiente de Correlación Intraclase (CCI) en el rango de concordancia excelente (? 0,971), confirmado por los gráficos de Bland-Altman, y simetría adecuada entre las mediciones evidenciadas por la línea de regresión lineal. El presente estudio confirma la alta reproducibilidad de USG en la estimación de la adiposidad visceral, un importante predictor de riesgo cardiovascular y metabólico.
Citas
Lee YH, Park J, Min S, Kang O, Kwon H, Oh SW. Impact of Visceral Obesity on the Risk of Incident Metabolic Syndrome in Metabolically Healthy Normal Weight and Overweight Groups: a longitudinal cohort study in Korea. Korean J Fam Med. 2020 Jul;41(4):229-236. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.18.0122.
Boone SC, Van SM, Rosendaal FR, Le CS, Groenwold RHH, Jukema JW, et al. Evaluation of the Value of Waist Circumference and Metabolomics in the Estimation of Visceral Adipose Tissue. Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 6;191(5):886-899. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab298.
Hu HH, Chen J, Shen W. Segmentation and quantification of adipose tissue by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Mater Physics Biol Med. 2015 Sep 4;29(2):259-276. doi: 10.1007/s10334-015-0498-z.
Ponti F, Cinque A, Fazio N, Napoli A, Guglielmi G, Bazzocchi A. Ultrasound imaging, a stethoscope for body composition assessment. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Aug;10(8):1699-1722. doi: 10.21037/qims-19-1048.
García-Almeida JM, García-García C, Vegas-Aguilar IM, Ballesteros PMD, Cornejo-Pareja IM, Fernández MB, et al. Nutritional ultrasound®: conceptualisation, technical considerations and standardisation. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr. 2023 Mar;70:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2022.11.010.
Ceniccola GD, Castro MG, Piovacari SMF, Horie LM, Corrêa FG, Barrere APN, et al. Current technologies in body composition assessment: advantages and disadvantages. Nutrition. 2019 Jun;62:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.11.028.
Gouvêa HR, Faria SL, Faria OP, Cardeal MA, Bezerra A, Ito MK. Validação da ultrassonografia para a avaliação da gordura abdominal visceral em obesos clinicamente graves. ABCD, arq. bras. cir. dig. (São Paulo). 2013;26(1):43-46.7. doi: 10.1590/s0102-67202013000600010.
Gishti O, Gaillard R, Durmus B, Abrahamse M, van der Beek EM, Hofman A, et al. BMI, total and abdominal fat distribution, and cardiovascular risk factors in school-age children. Pediatr Res. 2015 Feb 9;77(5):710-718. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.29.
Mauad FM, Chagas-Neto FA, Benedeti AC, Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Muglia VF, Carneiro AA, et al. Reproducibility of abdominal fat assessment by ultrasound and computed tomography. Radiol Bras. 2017 Jun;50(3):141-147. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2016.0023.
Murphy J, Bacon SL, Morais JA, Tsoukas MA, Santosa S. Intra-Abdominal Adipose Tissue Quantification by Alternative Versus Reference Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Jul;27(7):1115-1122. doi: 10.1002/oby.22494.
Lorenzo A, Romano L, Renzo L, Lorenzo N, Cenname G, Gualtieri P. Obesity: a preventable, treatable, but relapsing disease. Nutrition. 2020 Mar;71:110615. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110615.
Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Pub; 1988.
Leone A, Battezzati A, Bedogni G, Vignati L, Vanzulli A, Amicis R, et al. Sex- and Age-Related Differences in the Contribution of Ultrasound-Measured Visceral and Subcutaneous Abdominal Fat to Fatty Liver Index in Overweight and Obese Caucasian Adults. Nutrients. 2019 Dec 9;11(12):3008-3018. doi: 10.3390/nu11123008.
Oh J, Kim SK, Shin DK, Park KS, Park SW, Cho YW. A Simple Ultrasound Correlate of Visceral Fat. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Sep;37(9):1444-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.844.
Kim SK, Kim HJ, Hur KY, Choi SH, Ahn CW, Lim SK, et al. Visceral fat thickness measured by ultrasonography can estimate not only visceral obesity but also risks of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Apr;79(4):593-599. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.4.593.
Jena D, Choudhury AK, Mangaraj S, Singh M, Mohanty BK, Baliarsinha AK. Study of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat thickness and its correlation with cardiometabolic risk factors and hormonal parameters in polycystic ovary syndrome. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jun;22(3):321-327. doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_646_17.
Philipsen A, Carstensen B, Sandbaek A, Almdal TP, Johansen NB, Jørgensen ME, et al. Reproducibility of ultrasonography for assessing abdominal fat distribution in a population at high risk of diabetes. Nutr Diabetes. 2013 Aug;3(8):e82. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2013.23.
Novais RLR, Café ACC, Morais AA, Bila WC, Santos GDS, Lopes CAO, et al. Intra-abdominal fat measurement by ultrasonography: association with anthropometry and metabolic syndrome in adolescents. J Pediatr. 2019 May;95(3):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2018.03.004.
Bertoli S, Leone A, Vignati L, Spadafranca A, Bedogni G, Vanzulli A, et al. Metabolic correlates of subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat measured by ultrasonography: a comparison with waist circumference. Nutr J. 2016 Dec;15(1):2-8. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0120-2.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10. PMID: 2868172.
Miclos-Balica M, Muntean P, Schick F, Haragus HG, Glisici B, Pupazan V, et al. Reliability of body composition assessment using A-mode ultrasound in a heterogeneous sample. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020 Sep 11;75(3):438-445. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-00743-y.
Schlecht I, Wiggermann P, Behrens G, Fischer B, Koch M, Freese J, et al. Reproducibility and validity of ultrasound for the measurement of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues. Metabolism. 2014 Dec;63(12):1512-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.07.012.
Pimanov S, Bondarenko V, Makarenko E. Visceral fat in different locations assessed by ultrasound: correlation with computed tomography and cut-off values in patients with metabolic syndrome. Clin Obes. 2020 Aug 28;10(6):1-9. doi: 10.1111/cob.12404.
Gadalla AAH, El-Dayem SMA, Fayed ERH, El-Bohy AM. Role of Ultrasonography Compared to Computed Tomography in Measurement of Visceral Adipose Tissue and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in Diabetic Overweight and Obese Adolescents. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022 Jun 30;10:1715-1719. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.9708.
Philipsen A, Jørgensen ME, Vistisen D, Sandbaek A, Almdal TP, Christiansen JS, et al. Associations between Ultrasound Measures of Abdominal Fat Distribution and Indices of Glucose Metabolism in a Population at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: The ADDITION-PRO Study. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0123062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123062.
Azzi AJ, Lafrenière AS, Gilardino M, Hemmerling T. Ultrasonography Technique in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Measurement: a systematic review. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Apr;38(4):877-888. doi: 10.1002/jum.14789.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia

Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos de primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude da aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais, desde que seja dada a atribuição. Esta obra foi licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional - CC BY