Constitutional Interpretation: between dynamic and integrity

Authors

  • Clèmerson Merlin Clève
  • Bruno Meneses Lorenzetto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n72p67

Abstract

This article talks about the constitutional interpretation from the perspective of two normative theories of jurisdiction: on one hand, Ronald Dworkin’s law as integrity; on the other, William Eskridge’s dynamic statutory interpretation.The theories are presented as indications for the debate about who has the best conditionsto make decisions on hard cases. Therefore, the article points out some changes that occurred lately on the constitutional jurisdiction, presents key aspects of the theories in focus and outlines commonalities and differences between the dynamic statutory interpretation and the theory of law as integrity.

Author Biographies

Clèmerson Merlin Clève

Professor Titular de Direito Constitucional da Universidade Federal do Paraná e do Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil – UniBrasil. Pós-graduado em Direito Público pela Université Catholique de Louvain, Bélgica.

Bruno Meneses Lorenzetto

Professor de Direito da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná. Visiting Scholar na Columbia Law School, Columbia University, New York. Doutor em Direito pela UFPR na área de Direitos Humanos e Democracia. Mestre em Direito pela UFPR na área do Direito das Relações Sociais.

Published

2016-04-26

How to Cite

CLÈVE, Clèmerson Merlin; LORENZETTO, Bruno Meneses. Constitutional Interpretation: between dynamic and integrity. Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies, Florianópolis, v. 37, n. 72, p. 67–92, 2016. DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n72p67. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n72p67. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos