A Crítica de Amartya Sen à Concepção Rawlsiana de Justiça

Flávio Pansieri

doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p181

The Amartya Sen’s Criticism to the Rawlsiane Conception of Justice

Authors

Flávio Pansieri Academia Brasileira de Direito Constitucional - Curitiba Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p181

Abstract

http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p181

The purpose of this text is to focus on justice subject by the philosophy of John Rawls and the economic vision of Amartya Sen. The objective is to present, initially, Amartya’s through about justice structured in a practical view, i.e., linked to a prospective point of view about solutions to social problems. Then, will be addressed the principles of justice by John Rawls and the critique of Amartya Sen to this conception, nominated as transcendental institutionalism by him. The intention is compose a parallel between these two different conception of fare, in the rush to contribute with this contemporary debate.

Author Biography

Flávio Pansieri, Academia Brasileira de Direito Constitucional - Curitiba Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

Flávio Pansieri é doutor em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, mestre em Direito pela Universidade de São Paulo, presidente do Conselho
Fundador da Academia Brasileira de Direito Constitucional – ABDConst, professor de Direito Constitucional da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (campus de Curitiba) e advogado.

Downloads

PDF/A (Português (Brasil))

Published

2016-12-21

How to Cite

PANSIERI, Flávio. The Amartya Sen’s Criticism to the Rawlsiane Conception of Justice. Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies, Florianópolis, v. 37, n. 74, p. 181–206, 2016. DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2016v37n74p181. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2016v37n74p181. Acesso em: 6 jul. 2024.