The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91Abstract
The validity of the legal system was thought by jus philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and Herbert Hart, respectively, the fundamental hypothetical norm and the rule of recognition. This article will address these concepts, with the goal of conducting a comparative study between the two, and then pointing out their similarities and differences. To do so, we used the deductive approach and bibliographic research. At the end of the article, similarities were perceived, both being theoretical constructions of legal positivism of criterion of validity for the legal order, and differences, a logical-transcendental presupposition of validity (Kelsen) as an element of fact of validity (Hart).Downloads
Published
2018-06-18
How to Cite
GONÇALVES, Alex Silva; QUIRINO, Regio Hermilton Ribeiro. The Hans Kelsen fundamental hypothetical standard and the Herbert Hart recognition rule: similarities and differences between the validity criteria of the legal system. Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies, Florianópolis, v. 39, n. 78, p. 91–118, 2018. DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n78p91. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
![Licença Creative Commons](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.