Transitional justice in Brazil and the jurisprudence of the inter-American court of human rights: a difficult dialogue with the Brazilian judiciary

Authors

  • Bruno Galindo Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Faculdade de Direito do Recife

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n79p27

Abstract

The paper will address transitional justice in Brazil, considering the objectives advocated by its general theory. The main idea is to make a legal analysis of the transition process in Brazil based on the relationship between Brazilian constitutional law and the Inter-American HumanRights System. It will be suggested to reflect on the ways of the dialogue between the two systems of protection of human rights (Inter-American and constitutional) proposed by some contemporary theories. As a conclusion, some reflections on how this situation contributes to the current Brazilian political crisis, especially for a certain popularization of authoritarianism as a political solution.

Author Biography

Bruno Galindo, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - Centro de Ciências Jurídicas - Faculdade de Direito do Recife

professor permanente, de direito constitucional, do Programade Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-14

How to Cite

GALINDO, Bruno. Transitional justice in Brazil and the jurisprudence of the inter-American court of human rights: a difficult dialogue with the Brazilian judiciary. Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies, Florianópolis, v. 39, n. 79, p. 27–44, 2018. DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n79p27. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n79p27. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos