Effects of the passage of time and the controversy over the fines’s limitation of action in courts of accounts: the application of law n. 9.873/1999 by analogy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n79p89

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to determine if the fine application by the Courts
of Accounts is subject to some limitation of action period and, if so, indicate the legal regime applicable to the hypothesis of non existence of a legal rule about it. The method of approach is based on deductive reasoning, based on qualitative and theoretical-practical research, with the object of a bibliographic documentary research. The conclusion indicates that, by analogy legis, the supervision of TCs should be subject to the closest public law norms and that regulate in all aspects the issue of prescription, provided for in Law n. 9,873/99.

Author Biographies

Marcos Ehrhardt Júnior, Universidade Federal de Alagoas – Maceió – AL, Brasil.

Doutor em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Professor de Direito Civil da Universidade Federal de Alagoas e do Centro Universitário Cesmac. Advogado.

Ricardo Schneider Rodrigues, Centro Universitário Cesmac – Maceió – AL, Brasil.

Doutorando em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Mestre em Direito Público pela Universidade Federal de Alagoas. Professor Titular da Faculdade de Direito do Centro Universitário CESMAC. Procurador do Ministério Público de Contas de Alagoas.

Published

2018-11-14

How to Cite

EHRHARDT JÚNIOR, Marcos; RODRIGUES, Ricardo Schneider. Effects of the passage of time and the controversy over the fines’s limitation of action in courts of accounts: the application of law n. 9.873/1999 by analogy. Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies, Florianópolis, v. 39, n. 79, p. 89–118, 2018. DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n79p89. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n79p89. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos