Logical Analysis of Law and Postpositivism – A Dialogue from the Theories of Alchourron/Bulygin and Atienza/Manero
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n80p31Abstract
For Carlos Alchourron and EugenioBulygin, a judicial sentence is justifiableaccording to law only if it contains a logicalsequence of rules and the description of a case.Manuel Atienza and Juan Ruiz Manero deny theapplication of this theory to the legal reasoning.They assert that a different conceptualapparatus is needed that understands law as anactivity where society participates and the juristhas the function of deploying it. This articleexamines and confronts the main theses of theauthors mentioned, emphasizing characters thatshould not be ignored when a judicial decisionis justified.Downloads
Published
2019-01-29
How to Cite
ALMANZA TORRES, Dennis José. Logical Analysis of Law and Postpositivism – A Dialogue from the Theories of Alchourron/Bulygin and Atienza/Manero. Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies, Florianópolis, v. 39, n. 80, p. 31–50, 2019. DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2018v39n80p31. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2018v39n80p31. Acesso em: 23 jan. 2025.
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.