Development and critics of effectiveness principle in EU international private law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p10Resumen
The present work tries to give some important insights and thoughts on the principle of effectiveness in EU law according to European Court of Human Rights. It also gives light to difficulties and effectiveness' impact on private international law. It is also analyzed through the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and art. 47 as an access tool to justice, judicial protection and effectiveness of the whole Union system.
Citas
ACCETTO, M.; ZLEPTNIG, S. The principle of effectiveness: Rethinking its role in community law. European Public Law, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 3, p. 375ss., 2005.
ANAGNOSTARAS, G. The quest for an effective remedy and the measure of judicial protection afforded to putative Community law rights. European Law Review, [S.l.], v. 32, n. 5, p. 727ss., 2007.
ANDREWS, N. Civil procedure. In: BURROWS, A. (ed.) English private law: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. chapter 22.
ARNULL, A. The principle of effective judicial protection in EU law: An unruly horse? In: European Law Review, [S.l.], v. 36, n. 1, p. 51ss., 2011.
AVBELJ, M.; KOMÁREK, J. Constitutional pluralism in the EU and beyond. Oxford & Oregon, Portland: Hart Publishing, 2012.
BALLESTROS, M. H. The regime of party autonomy in the Brussels I Recast: The solutions adopted for agreements on jurisdiction. Journal of Private International Law, [S.l.], v. 10, p. 292ss., 2014.
BARAV, A. Judicial enforcement and implementation of European Union law. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2017.
BARNARD, C.; PEERS, S. European Union law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 788ss.
BEAUMONT, P. et al. Cross-border litigation in Europe. Oxford & Oregon, Portland: Hart Publishing, 2017.
BECKER, F. Application of community law by member States public authorities: Between autonomy and effectiveness. Common Market Law Review, [S.l.], v. 44, n. 4, p. 1.035ss., 2007.
BERAUDO, I. P. Regards sur le nouveau Règlement Bruxelles I sur la compétence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l’exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale. Journal du Droit International, [S.l.], p. 742ss., 2013.
BERRY, E.; HOMEWOOD, M. Y.; BOGUSZ, B. Complete European Union law. Texts, cases and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
BLUMANN, C. Le juge national, gardien menottè de la protection juriditionnelle effective en droit Communautaire. La Semaine Juridique, [S.l.], edition gènèrale, n. 30, v. 25, p. 13ss., Juillet, 2007.
BOELE-WOELKI, K. et al. (ed.), Convergance and divergence in private international law: Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr. Eleven International Publishing: The Hague, 2010. p. 564ss.
BOVIS, C. EU public procurement law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2012. p. 218
BRAND, R. A.; FISH, T. An American perspective on the New Japanese Act on General Rules for Application of Laws. Japanese Yearbook of International Law, [S.l.], p. 302ss., 2008.
BROBERG, M.; FENGER, N. Preliminary references to the European Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 402ss.
CADIET, I.; HESS, B.; REQUEJO ISIDRO, M. Approaches to procedural law: the pluralism of methods. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017.
CALVO CARAVACA, A. L.; CARRASCOSA GONZÁLEZ, J. Litigaciòn internacional en la Uniòn Europea II. Granada: Comares, 2017. p. 106ss.
CARDONNEL, P.; ROSAS, A.; WAHL, N. Constitutionalising the EU judicial system: essays in honour of Pernilla Lindh. Portland: Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, 2012.
CARLIER, I. Y. Case C-200/02, Kunqian Catherine Zhu, Man Lavette Chen v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, Judgement of the CJEU of 19 October 2004. Common Market Law Review, [S.l.], v. 42, n. 4, p. 1121ss., 2005.
CARRUTHERS, J. Party Autonomy in the Legal Regulation of Adult Relationships: What Place for Party Choice in Private International Law? The International & Comparative Law Quarterly, [S.l.], v. 61, n. 4, p. 881ss., 2012.
CONWAY, G. European Union law. London & New York: Routledge, 2015.
CREMONA, M. Structural principles in EU external relations law. Portland: Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, 2018.
CREMONA, M.; THIES, A. The European Court of Justice and external relations law: constitutional challenges. Portland: Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, 2014.
CUNIBERTI, G. Abolition de l’exequatur et présomption de protection des droits fondamentaux. Revue Critique de Droit International Privè, [S.l.], v. 103, n. 1, p. 304ss., 2014.
CUNIBERTI, G. The recognition of foreign judgments lacking reasons in Europe: access to justice, foreign court avoidance and efficiency. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, [S.l.], v. 57, p. 25ss., 2008.
D’AVOUT, L., Droits fondamentaux et coordination des ordres juridiques en droit privé. In: DUBOUT, E.; TOUZÉ, S. (a cura di). Les droits fondamentaux: charnières entre ordres juridiques et systèmes juridiques. Paris: Pedone, 2010. p. 184ss.
D’AVOUT, L. La circulation automatique des titres exècutoires imposte par le règlement 805/2004 du 21 avril 2004. Revue Critique de Droit International Privè, [S.l.], v. 95, p. 2ss., 2006.
DA CRUZ VILAÇA, J. L. European Union law and integration. Twenty years of judicial application of European Union law. Portland: Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, 2014.
DANNEMANN, G.; VOGENAUER, D. The common European sales law in context. Interactions with english and german law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. p. 16ss.
DANOV, M.; BECKER, F.; BEAUMONT, D. Cross-border EU competition law actions. Oxford: Hart Publishing, Oxford University Press, 2013.
DEVENNEY, J.; KENNY, M. B.; KENNY, M. The transformation of European private law: Harmonisation, consolidation codification or chaos? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 60ss.
DICKINSON, A. The Rome II Regulation – The law applicable to non-contractual obligations – Updating supplement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010
ENGEL, A. The choice of legal basis for acts of the EU. Berlin: Springer, 2018.
FLETCHER, M.; HERLIN-KARNELL, E.; MATERA, C. The EU as an area of freedom, security and justice. London & New York: Routledge, 2016.
GASCÓN-INCHAUSTI, F. La reconnaissance et l’exécution des décisions dans le règlement Bruxelles I bis. In: GUINCHARD, E. (ed.). Le nouveau règlement Bruxelles I bis – Règlement n. 1215/2012 du 12 décembre 2012 concernant la compétence judiciaire, la reconnaissance et l’exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale. Bruxelles: Larcier, 2014. p. 210ss.
GAUTIER, M. Cour de justice, 19 octobre 2004, Kunqian Catherine Zhu et Man Lavette Chen v. Secretary of State for the Home Department. Revue des Affaires Européennes, [S.l.], v. 1, p. 673ss., 2003-2004.
GRARD, L. La communautarisation de Bruxelles I. Revue Gènèrale de Droit International Public, [S.l.], v. 117, n. 4, p. 530ss., 2013.
GROUSSOT, X.; PETURSSON, G. T.; The EU Charter of the Fundamental Rights five years on. The emergence of a new constitutional framework? In: DE VRIES, S.; BERNITS, U.; WEATHERILL, S. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as a binding instrument – Five years old and growing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
GUTMAN, K. The constitutional foundations of European contract law: a comparative analysis. Oxford: University Press Oxford, 2014.
HAMED, A.; TATSIANA, K. A step forward in the harmonization of European jurisdiction: Regulation Brussels I Recast. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, [S.l.], v. 9, p. 162ss., 2016.
HANCHER, I.; OTTERNANGER, T.; SLOT, P. J. EU State aids. London; Sweet & Maxwell, 2012. p. 1.012.
HARTKAMP, A.; SIBURGH, C.; DEVROE, W. Cases, materials and text on European Union law and private law. Portland: Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, 2017. p. 282ss.
HATJE, A.; TERHECHTE, J. P.; MÜLLER-GRAFF, P. C. Europarechtswissenschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2018.
HAY, P. Notes on the European Union’s Brussels-I “Recast” Regulation. The European Legal Forum, [S.l.], p. 2ss., 2013.
HERLIN-KARNELL, E. Recent developments in the area of European criminal law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, [S.l.], v. 14, p. 16ss., 2007.
HOFFMEISTER, F. Enforcing the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in Member States: how far are Rome, Budapest and Bucharest from Brussels. In: VON BOGDANDY, A.; SONNEVAND, P. Constitutional crisis in the European constitutional area, theory, law and politics in Hungary and Romania. Oxford; Baden-Baden: Hart Publishing; Nomos, 2015. p. 126ss.
HOFSTÖTTER, B. A cascade of rights, or who shall care for little Catherine? Some reflections on the Chen case. European Law Review, [S.l.], v. 30, n. 4, p. 548ss., 2005.
IOANNIDOU, M. Consumer involvement in private EU competition law enforcement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
JAKAB, A.; KOCHENOV, D. The enforcement of EU law and values: ensuring member States compliance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
KÖHLER, B., Dual-use contracts as consumer contracts and no attribution of consumer status of a third party to the proceedings under Brussels-I Regulation. Praxis des Internationalen Privat-und Verfahrensrecht, [S.l.], v. 37, n. 6, 2017.
KOMÁREK, J. In the court(s) we trust? On the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure. European Law Review, [S.l.], v. 32, n. 4, p. 468ss., 2007.
KRAMER, X. E. The interaction between Rome I and mandatory European Union private rules-EPIL and EPL: Communicating vessels? In: STONE, P.; FARAH, Y. Research Handbook on European Union private international law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. p. 250ss.
KROLL-LUDWIGS, K. Die Rolle der Parteiautonomie in europäischen Kollisionsrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013. p. 573ss.
KUNOY, B. A Union of National Citizens: the origins of the CJEU’s lack of avant-gardisme in the Chen case. Common Market Law Review, [S.l.], v. 43, n. 1, p. 179ss., 2006.
LARSEN, T. B. Intellectual property jurisdiction strategies – Where to litigate unitary rights vs. national rights. [S.l.]: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2017.
LENAERTS, K.; MASELIS, I.; GUTMAN, K. EU procedural law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
LENAERTS, K.; MASELIS, I.; GUTMAN, K. European Union procedural law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 133ss.
LIAKOPOULOS, D. Interactions between European Court of Human Rights and private international law of European Union. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, 2018.
LISANTI, C.; SAUTONIE-LAGUIONIE, L. Règlement UE n. 2015/848 du 20 mai 2015 relatif aux procèdures d’insolvabilitè. Societè de lègislation comparèe, Trans Europe experts, [S.l.], 2016.
MARQUIS, M.; CISOTTA R. (a cura di). Litigation and arbitration in EU competition law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.
MASTROIANNI, R.; PEZZA, A. Striking the right balance: limits on the right to bring an action under article 263(4) of the treaty on the Functioning of The European Union. American University International Law Review, [S.l.], v. 29, p. 744ss., 2015.
MCPARLAND, M. The Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
MERKIN, R. The Rome I Regulation and reinsurance. Journal of Private International Law, [S.l.], v. 5, 2009.
MEYER, J. (ed.). Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014. p. 813-826.
NICOLA, F.; DAVIES, B. European Union law stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
NIELSEN, P. A. The New Brussels I Regulation. Common Market Law Review, [S.l.], v. 50, n. 3, p. 503ss., 2013.
NUYTS, A. La refonte du règlement Bruxelles I. Revue Critique de Droit International Privé, [S.l.], p. 3ss., 2013.
OKOLI, C. S. A.; ARISHE, H. O. The operation of the escape clauses in the Rome Convention, Rome I Regulation and Rome II Regulation. Journal of Private International Law, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 4, p. 516ss.,
PAUNEN, K. European insolvency regulation – Commentary. Hamburg: De Gruyter, 2011.
PAYAN, G. Droit européen de l’exécution en matière civile et commerciale. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2012.
PEERS, S. et al. (ed.). The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, a Commentary. Portland: Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, 2014. p. 1.523-1.538.
PÉROZ, H. Le règlement CE n. 805/2004 del 21 avril 2004 portant crèation d’un titre exècutoire europèen pour les crèances incontestèes. Clunet, [S.l.], p. 638ss., 2005.
PFEIFFER, T. The abolition of exequatur and the free circulation of judgments. In: FERRARI, F.; RAGNO, F. (ed.). Cross-border litigation in Europe: the Brussels I Recast Regulation as a panacea? The Hague: Wolters Kluwer/Cedam, 2016. p. 188ss.
POHL, M. Die Neufassung der EuGVVO-im Spannungsfeld zwischen Vertrauen und Kontrolle. Praxis des Internationalen Privat-und Verfahrensrechts, [S.l.], v. 33, p. 109ss., 2013.
POILLOT, E. The ECJ and general principles derived from the acquis Communautaire. Oslo Law Review, [S.l.], n. 1, 2014.
PRECHAL, S.; WIDDERSHOVEN, R. Effectiveness or effective judicial protection: A poorly articulated relationship, in today’s multilayered legal order: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Arten W. H. Heij. Zutphen: Paris Legal Publishers, 2011. p. 283ss.
PULJKO, V. Regulation (EU) n. 1.215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters with special reference to the relationship between the Regulation and arbitration. Interdisciplinary Management Research, [S.l.], v. 17, p. 4ss., 2015.
RIJAVEC, V.; JELINEK, W.; BREHM, W. Die Erleichterung der Zwangsvollstreckung in Europa. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2012. p. 214ss.
SACK, D. Europeanization through law compliance and party differences. The ECJ’s Rüffert judgment C-346/06 and amendments to public procurement laws in German Federal State. Journal of European Integration, [S.l.], v. 34, v. 3, p. 244ss., 2012.
SADLER, A. From the Brussels Convention to Regulation 44/2001. Cornerstones of a European law of civil procedure. Common Market Law Review, [S.l.], v. 42, p. 1638ss., 2005.
SÁNCHEZ, S. I. The Court and the Charter: The impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on the ECJ’s approach to fundamental Right. Common Market Law Review, [S.l.], v. 49, n. 5, p. 1566ss., 2012.
SCHOLTEN, M. Mind the trend! Enforcement of EU law has been moving to Brussels. Journal of European Public Policy, [S.l.], v. 24, n. 9, p. 1350ss., 2017.
SCHWARZE, J. et al. EU-Kommentar. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2019.
STAUDINGER, A. Schiedsspruch und Urteil mit vereinbarten Wortlaut, in Festschrift für Friedrich Graf von Westfalen. Köln: Otto Schmidt Verlag, 2010. p. 662ss.
STERN, K.; SACHS, M. Europäische Grundrecht Charta. München: C. H. Beck, 2016. p. 756ss. STORME, M. Harmonisation of civil procedure and the interaction with substantive private law. In: KRAMER, X. E.; VAN RHEE, C. H. Civil litigation in a globalizing World. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2012. p. 142ss.
THÖNE, M. Die Abschaffung des Exequaturverfahrens und die EuGVVO – Veröffentlichungen zum Verfahrensrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2016.
THORSON, B. Individual rights in EU law. Berlin: Springer, 2016. p. 182ss. TRIDIMAS, T. Bifurcated justice: the dual character of judicial protection in EU law, in A.A.V.V. The Court of Justice and the construction of Europe: analyses and perspectives on sixty years of case law. The Hague: Springer, 2013. p. 367ss.
TRIDIMAS, T. Fundamental rights, general principles of EU law and the Charter. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 364ss., 2014.
TRYFONIDOU, A. Case C-200/02, Kunqian Catherine Zhu, Man Lavette Chen v. Secretary of State for the Home Department: further cracks in the ‘great wall’ of the European Union? European Public Law, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 528ss., 2005.
TÜRK, A. H. Judicial review in European Union law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2010.
USHERWOOD, J.; PINDER, S. The European Union: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
VAN BALLEGOOI, W. The nature of mutual recognition in European law. Intersentia: Antwerp & Oxford, 2015.
VAN HOE, A. Enterprise groups and their insolvency: it’s the (common) interest, stupid! European Company and Financial Law Review, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 2, 2014.
VANDENBORRE, I. European Union competition law procedural issues. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 6, p. 508ss., 2013.
VON DER GROEBEN, H.; SCHWARZE, J.; HATJE, A. Europäisches Unionsrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015. p. 820ss.
WAIS, H. Einseitige Gerichtsstandverinbarungen und die Schranken der Parteiautonomie. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, [S.l.], v. 81, 2017.
WESSELS, B. A global approach to cross-border insolvency cases in a globalizing world. The Dovenschmidt Quarterly, [S.l.], p. 17ss., 2013.
WHINCOP, M. J.; KEYES, M.; POSNER, R. A. Policy and pragmatism in the conflict of laws. London & New York: Routledge, 2018.
WIERZBOWSKI, M.; GUBRYNOWICZ, A. International investment law for the 21st century. Oxford; Oxford University Press, 2015.
WOODS, L.; WATSON, P. Steiner & Woods European Union law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. p. 37ss.
WOUTER, P. J. W. Ten years of Regulation 1/2003-A retrospective. Journal of European Competition Law and Practice, [S.l.], v. 4, 2013.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
