Low Institutionalism and Populism in Brazil and the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2023.e93553Palabras clave:
Populism, Authoritarianism, Low institutionality, Social anomieResumen
This article has as its theme populism and the low institutionality in Brazil. It seeks to answer the question of why populism in Brazil and the United States led to a degradation of the institutions. The hypothesis is the presence of a contemporary authoritarian personality, which, combined with the electoral and administrative strategies allowed by the institutionality itself, led to a degradation of institutions towards a kind of not only economic, but also social anarcapitalism, which consists of a society without rules. The objective, therefore, will be to clarify how this process of low institutionality took place. The method consisted in the use of a hypothetical-deductive stance, where, in a first moment, the contemporary authoritarian personality was studied, in a second moment the forms of circulation of power and Law and, finally, the consequences in loss of institutionality. It was concluded in the sense of the hypothesis, that is, that populist leaders had at hand tools granted by the institutionality itself for the destruction of the rules of a minimally civilized society.
Citas
ADORNO, Theodor W. Estudos sobre a personalidade autoritária (The Authoritarian Personality). São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2019.
GHIRALDELLI, Paulo. A Democracia de Bolsonaro: 2018-2020 (Bolsonaro’s Democracy: 2018-2020). São Paulo: CEFA editorial, 2021.
GHIRALDELLI, Paulo. A República de Rio das Pedras (The Rio das Pedras Republic). Disponível em: https://ghiraldelli.online/2021/07/12/a-republica-de-rio-das-pedras/ Acesso em: 01 nov. 2022.
GHIRALDELLI, Paulo. Semiocapitalismo: a era da desreferencialização (Semiocapitalism: the era of dereferentialization). São Paulo: CEFA editorial, 2022.
GUATARI, Felix. Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Trans. Paul Baines and Julian Pefanis. Power Publications: Sydney. 1995.
HAN, Hyung-Chul. The Burnout Society. Stanford. 2015.
HOURNEY, Karen. Neurosis and Human Growt. Norton: New York, 1950.
KALIL, Isabela Oliveira. Quem são e no que acreditam os eleitores de Jair Bolsonaro (Who Jair Bolsonaro's voters are and what they believe). Disponível em: https://www.fespsp.org.br/upload/usersfiles/2018/Relat%C3%B3rio%20para%20Site%20FESPSP.pdf Acesso em: 01 nov. 2022.
KHEL, Maria Rita. Ressentimento (Resentment). São Paulo: Boitempo, 2020.
LIPOVETSKY, Gilles. A Sociedade da Sedução: Democracia e narcisismo na hipermodernidade liberal. São Paulo: Manole, 2020.
LUHMANN, Niklas. La Sociedad de la Sociedad. Cuidad de México: Herder, 2007.
LUHMANN, Niklas. O Direito da Sociedade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2016.
RECK, Janriê Rodrigues.; BITENCOURT, Caroline Müller. Direito Administrativo e o diagnóstico de seu tempo no Brasil (Administrative Law and the assessment of its time in Brazil). A&C – Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, Belo Horizonte, ano 19, n. 75, p. 241-264, jan./mar. 2019.
REICH, Wilhelm. The Mass Psychology of Fascism (Massenpsychologie des Faschismus, translated by Theodore P. Wolfe). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1946.
SILVA JR. Nelson da Silva. O Brasil da barbárie à desumanização neoliberal: do “Pacto edípico e pacto social”, de Hélio Pellegrino, ao “E daí”, de Jair Bolsonaro. In: DUNKER, Christian.; SILVA Jr., Nelson da.; SAFATLE, Vladimir (org.). Neoliberalismo como gestão do sofrimento psíquico. Belo Horizonte: Autência, 2020.