Depictions and minifiction: a reflection on translation of micro-story as didactics of sign language interpreters training in colombia.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7968.2015v35nesp2p427Abstract
The article presents reflections on methodological translation-practice approach to sign language interpreter’s education focus in communicative competence. Implementing translation-practice approach experience started in several workshops of the Association of Translators and Interpreters of Sign Language of Colombia (ANISCOL) and have now formalized in the bachelor in education degree project in signed languages, develop within Research Group UMBRAL from National Open University and Distance of Colombia-UNAD. The didactic proposal focus on the model of the efforts (Gile), specifically in the production and listen efforts. A criticism about translating competence is presented. Minifiction is literary genre with multiple semiotic and philosophical translation possibilities. These literary texts have elements with great potential to render on visual, gestural and spatial depictions of Colombian sign language which is profitable to interpreter training and education. Through El Dinosaurio sign language translation, we concludes with an outline and reflections on the pedagogical and didactic potential of minifiction and depictions in the design of training activities in sign language interpreters.References
BARRETO MUÑOZ, A. G. (2013). Depictions, Espaços Mentais e Coesão na Tradução e Interpretação de Lingua de Sinais. Taller, APILDF-Universidade de Brasilia, Facultade de Educação, Brasilia.
BARRETO MUÑOZ, A. G. (en edición). Preservation of Sign Language (Veditz, 1913): Uma Leitura das Normas Surdas de Tradução para America Latina.
BARRETO MUÑOZ, A., & BUSTOS, O. (2012). Teorias de la Traducción/Interpretación en plastilina. Bogotá: Ediciones ANISCOL.
BÉRTOLA, C., & FERNÁNDEZ, A. (2011). Notas para el estudio de las voces intérprete, ladino y lenguaraz en territorio oriental (siglos XVII a XIX). V Seminario sobre lexicología y lexicografía del español y del portugués americanos: a 200 años del inicio del proceso independentista del Uruguay. Montevideo: Academia Nacional de Letras.
CORTÉS, Y. (2013). Un acercamiento a los depictions como elementos constitutivos de los textos expositivos y argumentativos en LSC: implicaciones curriculares. Recuperado el 25 de junio de 2015, de Fenascol: http://www.fenascol.org.co/SEDasignaturaLSC/doctos/INVESTIGACION_LINGUISTICA.pdf
DERRIDA, J. (1998). De la gramatología. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
DILTHEY, W. (1890 [2010]). Wilhelm Dilthey: Selected Works: Understanding the Human World (Vol. II). (R. A. Makkreel, & F. Rodi, Edits.) Pricenton University Press.
DUDIS, P. (2008). Depiction Identification Flowchart version 4.9.1. Recuperado el 3 de Abril de 2013, de Gallaudet Facultu-Staff Profile: http://www.gallaudet.edu/Documents/flowchart%20version%204.9.1.pdf
DUDIS, P. (2011). The body in scene: depictions. En C. Roy (Ed.), Discourse in Signed Languages. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
DUDIS, P. (2007). Types of Depiction in ASL. Recuperado el 3 de Abril de 2013, de Gallaudet Faculty-Staff Profile: http://www.gallaudet.edu/documents/academic/drl-dudis2007.pdf
DURANTI, A. (2000). Antropología Lingüística. Madrid: Cambridge University Press.
ECO, U. (2008). Decir casi lo mismo. Barcelona : Lumen.
ECO, U. (1996). Seis Paseos Por Los Bosques Narrativos. Madrid: Lumen.
EMMOREY, K. (2002). Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights From Sign Language Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
EMMOREY, K. (2003). Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
FAUCONNIER, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GALVAN, B. D. (1988). The acquisition of three morphological subsystems in American Sign Language by deaf children with deaf or hearing parents. Tesis doctoral inédita, University of California, Berkeley.
GILE, D. (2009). Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
GONZÁLEZ MARTINEZ, H. (Ed.). (2014). La minificción en el siglo XXI: aproximaciones teóricas. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
GUTT, E.-A. (2000). Translation and relevance. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
HARRIS, B. (1980). Bi-text: A New Concept in Translation Theory. Language Monthly (54), 8-10.
HARRIS, B. (1980). How a Three-Year-Old Translates. En E. A. Afendras (Ed.), Patterns of Bilingualism (págs. 370-393). Singapur: RELC.
HAUSER, P. C., FINCH, K. L., & HAUSER, A. B. (Edits.). (2008). Deaf Professionals and Designated Interpreters: A New Paradigm. Washington: Galaudet University Press.
HERNÁNDEZ, L. F. (2002). Circo de Tres pistas y otros mundos mínimos. Ciudad de México: Ficticia.
HOLZ-MÄNTTÄRI, J. (1986). Translatorisches Handeln - theoretisch fundierte Berufsprofile. En M. Snell-Hornby, Übersetzungswissenschaft - Eine Neuorientierung. Zur Intergrierung von Theorie und Praxis (págs. 348 - 374). Tübingen: Francke.
HOLZ-MÄNTTÄRI, J. (1984). Traslatorisches Handeln. Theorie und Methode. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
HYMES, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
JACOBS, R. (1996). Just how hard is it to learn ASL: The case for ASL as a truly foreign language. En M. a. communities, & C. Lucas (Ed.). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
JARRÍN BALLESTEROS, H. (2014). Cinco características de la posmodernidad en el relato breve. En H. Gonzalez Martinez (Ed.), La minificción en el siglo XXI: Aproximaciones teoricas (pág. 365). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
LANGACKER, R. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
LANGDON, C. (2011). Emergence of Depiction in Acquisition of American Sign Language. Poster Tesis doctoral, Gallaudet University, Linguistic, Lafayette, Indiana.
LIDDELL, S. (2003). Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MCNEIL, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
MALINOVSKY, B. (1935). Coral Gardens and Their Magic The Language and Magic of Gardening. New York: Routledge.
METZGER, M. (1995). Construed Dialogue and Construed Action in American Sign Language. En C. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolingüístics in Deaf Communities (Vol. 1, págs. 255 - 272). Washintong: Gallaudet University Press.
MONTERROSO, A. (1959). El Dinosaurio. En A. Monterroso, Obras Completas (y otros cuentos) (pág. 75). México DF: Joaquín Mortiz.
NORD, C. (1998). La unidad de traducción en el enfoque funcionalista. Quaderns: Revista de traducció , 65-77.
OBLER, L. K., & GJERLOW, K. (2000). El lenguaje y el Cerebro. Madrid: Cambridge University Press.
OVIEDO, A. (2004). Classifier in Venezuelan Sign Language. Hamburg: Signum.
OVIEDO, A. (2001). Apuntes para una gramática de la lengua de señas colombiana. Bogotá: INSOR - UNIVALLE.
PACHECO, J. E. (1990). La sangre de Medusa. Ciudad de México: Era.
PADDEN, C. (1986). Verbs and Role-shifting in ASL. Proceedings of the 4th National Symposium on Signing Research and Teaching. Las Vegas, Nevada. Washington, DC: The National Association of the Deaf.
PENG, F. C. (1974). Kinship Signs in Japanese Sign Language. Sign Language Studies , 5, 31 - 47.
QUINTO-POZO, D. (2005). Factors that Influence the Acquisition of ASL for. En M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Edits.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
QUINTO-POZOS, D. (2007). Why Does Constructed Action Seem Obligatory? An Analisys of "Classifer" and the Lack of Articulator-Referent Correspondence. Sign Language Studies , 7 (4), 458 - 506.
REISS, K., & VERMEER, H. (1996). Fundamentos para una teoría funcional de la traducción. Madrid: Akal.
SCHELLING, F. W. (1807 [1954]). Sobre la relación de las artes figurativas del arte con la naturaleza. Madrid: Aguilar.
SCHEMBRI, A. (2003). Rethinking ‘Classifiers’ in Signed Languages. En K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages (págs. 3 - 34). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
SCHICK, B. (1990). The Effects of Morphosyntactic Structure on the Acquisition of Classifier Predicates. En C. Lucas (Ed.). Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
SLOBIN, D., HOITING, N., KUNTZE, M., LINDERT, R., WEINBERG, A., J., P., Y OTROS. (2003). A cognitive/functional perspective on the acquisition of ‘‘classifiers.’’. En K. Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages (págs. 271 - 296). Mahwah, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
SOUZA, S. X. (2010). A Norma Surda de Tradução em Ambientes Virtuais de Ensino e Aprendizagem: O Caso do Curso de Letras-Libras da UFSC. Recuperado el 23 de 04 de 2013, de II congresso nacional de pesquias em tradução e interpretação de LIBRAS y lingua portuguesa: http://www.congressotils.com.br/anais2010/Saulo%20Xavier%20de%20Souza.pdf
SPEBER, D., & WILSON, D. (1986 (1994)). La relevancia. (E. Leonetti, Trad.) Madrid, España: Visor.
STONE, C. (2009). Toward a Deaf Translation Norm. Washintong: Gallaudet University Press.
THUMANN, M. (2011). Identifying depiction: Constructed Action and Constructed Dialogue. En Discourse in Signed Languaes (págs. 46-66). Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
THUMANN, M. (2013). Identifying Recurring Depiction in ASL Presentations. Sign Language Studies , 13 (2), 316 - 349.
TOBÓN, S. (2005). Formación basada en competencias: Pensamiento complejo, diseño curricular y didáctica. Bogotá: ECOE Ediciones.
TOURY, G. (2004). Estudios descriptivos de la traducción y más allá. (R. Rabadán, Trad.) Madrid, España: Cátedra.
URBINA JOIRO, H. (2006). Entre las huellas de la India Catalina. Cartagena de Indias: Academia de la Historia de Cartagena de Indias.
WINSTON, E. (1996). Spatial Mapping in ASL Discourse. Assesing our work; 11th National Convention. Little Rock, Arkansas: CIT Proceedings.
WITTE, H. (2008). Traducción y Percepción Intercultural. Albolote (Granada): Comares.
ZABALA, L. (2005). La minificción bajo el microscopio. Bogotá: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors hold the copyright and grant the journal the right for their articles' first publication, being their works simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which allows the sharing of such works with its authorship acknowledged and its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or as a book chapter, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal).
