No one came from Outside: A critique of the abject-Lovecraftian foundations of dark ecology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2023.e92273Keywords:
Otherness, Outside, Weird fiction, Monstrosity, AccelerationismAbstract
In recent decades, philosophical reflection on the utopian has focused on the analysis of the way in which the future-possible and the radically unknown or “other” influence our present. Specifically, accelerationism and Object-oriented Ontology have identified horror and weird fiction in general, and H. P. Lovecraft in particular, as the privileged field from which to access a radically anti-humanist absolute exteriority (Outside) with the aim of developing a new anti-species worldview, one which Timothy Morton calls “Dark Ecology.” This article analyzes the philosophical foundations of this worldview, showing the exclusive and proto-fascist character it harbors, which is why it should be clearly separated from other post-humanisms and/or new materialisms based on the hybridization and interconnection characteristic of relational ontologies.
References
Ablett, Sarah. “Approaching abjection in Sarah Kane’s blasted.” Performance Research, vol. 19, no. 1, 2014, pp. 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2014.908085.
Atack, Margaret. “Abjection, Derision and Power: Writing in the Voice of the Victim in Three French Post-War Texts.” Law, Culture and the Humanities, vol. 18, no. 3, 2022, pp. 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872119879346.
Berardi, Franco B. The Second Coming. Polity Press, 2019.
Brassier, Ray. Nihil Unbound: Enlightenment and Extinction. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Bryant, Courtney. “Incarnational Power: The Queering of the Flesh and Redemption in Lovecraft Country.” Black Theology, vol. 19, no. 3, 2021, pp. 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2021.1990497
Castro-Gómez, Santiago. “Decolonizar la Universidad. La hybris del punto cero y el diálogo de saberes.” El giro decolonial: Reflexiones para una diversidad epistémica más allá del capitalismo global, edited by Ramón Grosfoguel, and Santiago Castro Gómez, Siglo del hombre, 2007, pp. 79–90.
CCRU. Writings 1997-2003. Time Spiral Press, 2015.
CCRU. Hiperstition. Segovia: Materia Oscura, 2021.
Culp, Andrew. Dark Deleuze. U of Minnesota P, 2016.
Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and repetition. Columbia UP, 1995.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A thousand plateaus capitalism and schizophrenia. U of Minnesota P, 1987.
Fisher, Mark. The Weird and the Eeire. Repeater, 2016.
Guy, Jean-Sébastien. “Durkheim meets Cthulhu: the impure sacred in H. P. Lovecraft.” Journal for Cultural Research, vol. 24, no. 4, 2020, pp. 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2020.1835443
Haraway, Donna. The Haraway Reader. Routledge, 2004.
Haraway, Donna. Staying with the trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. London: Duke UP, 2016.
Haraway, Donna. How like a Leaf. An Interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York Routledge, 2000.
Harman, Graham. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. re-press, 2009.
Harman, Graham. Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Zero Books, 2012.
Harman, Graham. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Penguin, 2017.
Houellebecq, Michael. H. P. Lovecraft: Contre le monde. Contre la vie. Éditions du Rocher, 1999.
Igrek, Apple Z. “Inanimate speech from Lovecraft to Žižek.” Comparative Literature and Culture, vol. 13, no. 4, 2011, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1781.
Janik, Mateusz. “The fear of monism: Monstrosity, parapolitics, and early modern sources of the comparative philosophy.” Praktyka Teoretyczna, vol. 37, no. 3, 2020, pp. 45–78. https://doi.org/10.14746/prt2020.3.3.
Kristeva, Julia. Powers of horror. An essay on abjection. Columbia UP, 1982.
Land, Nick. The thirst for annihilation. Georges Bataille and virulent nihilism.Routledge, 2005.
Land, Nick. Phyl-Undhu. Abstract Horror. Extreminator. Time Spiral Press, 2014.
Land, Nick. La Ilustración Oscura. Y otros ensayos sobre la Neorreacción. Materia Oscura, 2022.
Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. UP, 2004.
Mayer, Jed. “The weird ecologies of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.” Science-Fiction Studies, vol. 45, no. 2, 2018, pp. 229–243. https://doi.org/10.5621/sciefictstud.45.2.0229.
Moreland, Sean, editor. New Directions in Supernatural Horror Literature: The Critical Influence of H. P. Lovecraft. Springer, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95477-6.
Morton, Timothy. Being Ecological. The MIT Press, 2018.
Morton, Timothy. Dark Ecology. For a Logic of future coexistence. Columbia UP, 2016.
Morton, Timothy. Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality. Open UP, 2013.
Negarestani, Reza. “The labor of the inhuman.” Accelerate: The Accelerationist Reader, edited by Robin Mackay and Armen Avanessian. Urbanomic, 2014, pp. 425–466.
Negarestani, Reza. “Globe of Revolution: An Afterthought on Geophilosophical Realism.” Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, vol. 8, no. 2, 2011, pp. 25–54. https://doi.org/10.51151/identities.v8i2.263.
Negarestani, Reza. Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials. Re-press, 2008.
Poller, Jake. “New Weird Fiction and the Oneirologic of Both-And.” Textual Practice, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2022.2111701.
Possamaï, Adam. “Cultural Consumption of History and Popular Culture in Alternative Spiritualities.” Journal of Consumer Culture, vol. 2, no. 2, 2002, pp. 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/146954050200200203
Ray, Dibyakusum. “The True-weird and the Dreadful ‘Large:’ Post Millennium American Horror Literature.” Palgrave Communications, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, n. 17080, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.80.
Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative III. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
Ringel, Faye. “I Am Providence: H. P. Lovecraft.” A Companion to American Gothic, edited by Charles L. Crow. The U of Chicago P, 2013, pp. 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118608395.ch21.
Sciscione, Anthony. “Symtomatic Horror: Lovecraft’s The Colour Out of Space.” Leper Creativity. Cyclonopedia Symposium, Punctum Books, 2012, pp. 131–146.
St John, Graham. “The DMT Gland: The Pineal, the Spirit Molecule, and Popular Culture.” International Journal for the Study of New Religions, vol. 7, no. 2, 2016, pp. 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsnr.v7i2.31949.
Thacker, Eugene. Cosmic Pessimism. Univocal Publishing, 2015a.
Thacker, Eugene. Tentacles longer than night. Horror of Philosophy vol. 3. Winchester: Zero Books, 2015b.
Thacker, Eugene. In the Dust of this Planet. Horror of Philosophy vol. 1. Winchester: Zero Books, 2011.
Weinreich, Spencer J. “The book in the house: The Regnum Congo and H. P. Lovecraft’s ‘The Picture in the House.’” Gothic Studies, vol. 20, no. 1, 2018, pp. 59–76. https://doi.org/10.7227/GS.0035.
Wenaus, Andrew. “Rhizomatic Horror: Eclipsed Narrative and Experimental Weird Fiction in Steve Beard’s Digital Leatherette.” Extrapolation, vol. 53, no. 1, 2012, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2012.2.
Wilke, Heinrich. “Character and Perspective in Cosmic Horror: Lovecraft and Kiernan.” Zeitschrift fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik, vol. 69, no. 2, 2020, pp. 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2021-2038.
Wynter, Sylvia. “Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation: An Argument.” The New Centennial Review, vol 3, no. 3, 2003, pp. 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015.
Wöll, Steffen. “The Horrors of the Oriental Space and Language in H. P. Lovecraft’s ‘The Shadow over Innsmouth.’” Zeitschrift fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik, vol. 68, no. 3,2020, pp. 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2020-2002.
Woodard, Ben. “Mad Speculation and Absolute Inhumanism: Lovecraft, Ligotti, and the Weirding of Philosophy.” Continent, vol. 1 no. 1, 2011, pp. 3-13. https://philpapers.org/rec/WOOMSA-2
Žižek, Slavoj, et al. The Neighbor. Three Inquiries in Political Theology. The U of Chicago P, 2005.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Julia Urabayen, Jorge León Casero
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
![Creative Commons Licence](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.