English as a Lingua Frankensteinia: An Investigation into the Perceptions of Educated Pakistani Populace

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2025.e105393

Palavras-chave:

Linguistic Imperalism, Lingua Frankensteinia, English in Pakistan, Socioeconomic Stratification, Cultural Linguistic Displacement

Resumo

This study explores how educated Pakistani professionals perceive the dominance of English and its effects on local languages and social structures. Though often viewed as a neutral lingua franca, English is framed here as a tool of linguistic imperialism, shaping education, economy, and identity. Guided by Robert Phillipson’s theory of Linguistic Imperialism and the metaphor of Lingua Frankensteinia, the study analyzes semi-structured interviews with four professionals. Findings reveal that English is seen as a path to upward mobility and global access but also as a source of cultural displacement and inequality. Local languages are increasingly marginalized, and English proficiency is tied to elitism and intelligence. The research calls for inclusive language policies that value indigenous languages while acknowledging English’s global role.

Biografia do Autor

Bilal Khan, Lincoln University College

The author is a PhD scholar at Lincoln University College, Malaysia

Anjali Hans, Lincoln University College

The author is an associate professor at Lincoln University College, Malaysia.

Romaisa Inam Ul Haq, University of Peshawar

The author has completed a Master's degree from Peshawar University, Pakistan.

Referências

Arreaga-Mayer, Carmen, Cheryl A. Utley, Claudia Perdomo-Rivera, and Charles R. Greenwood. "Eco behavioral assessment of instructional contexts in bilingual special education programs for English language learners at risk for developmental disabilities." Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 18, no. 1 (2003): 28-40.

Blommaert, J. (1999). Language ideological debates. Mouton.‏

Chamaar, K. (2007). A resolutely uncivilized colonial bump into postcolonialism. Studies in Language and Capitalism, 2(1), 145-154.‏

Cook, Vivian. "Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching." TESOL Quarterly 33, no. 2 (1999): 185-209.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.‏

Frank, A. G. "Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution? New York: Monthly Review Press." (1969).

Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2012). Paradigm controversies, contradictions, and confluences. Paradigms and perspectives in dispute: A handbook of qualitative research. Vol. II, 2.

Harper, Candace, Elizabeth Platt, Cindy Naranjo, Sylvia Boynton, Vaidehi Ramanathan, and Brian Morgan. "Marching in unison: Florida ESL teachers and No Child Left Behind." TESOL Quarterly 41, no. 3 (2007): 642-651.

Harper, Candace A., Ester J. De Jong, and Elizabeth J. Platt. "Marginalizing English as a second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequence of No Child Left Behind." Language Policy 7, no. 3 (2008): 267-284.

Holliday, A. (2006). Native-speakerism. ELT journal, 60(4), 385-387.

Holliday, A. (2016). Doing & writing qualitative research.‏

Janjua, F. (2008). Political and sociocultural factors in language loss: A study of language shift in North Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad). NUML Online Research Repository.

Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes. New York: Routledge.

Jenkins, R. (2014). Social identity. Routledge.

Kachru, B. B., Quirk, R., & Widdowson, H. G. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism. World Englishes. Critical Concepts in Linguistics, 241-270.‏

Keen, I. (2014). Language in the constitution of kinship. Anthropological Linguistics, 56(1), 1-53.

Khan, A. M., Yun, D. W., Ali, M. A., Zuhaib, K. M., Yuan, C., Iqbal, J., and Han, C. (2016). Passivity-based adaptive control for upper extremity assist exoskeleton. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 14 (1), 291-300.‏

Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes hardback with audio CD: Implications for international communication and English language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Kuper, L. (1989). The prevention of genocide: Cultural and structural indicators of genocidal threat. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 12(2), 157-174.‏

Lee, D. (2017). Competing discourses: Perspective and ideology in language. London, New York: Routledge.

Macaulay, T. B. (1835). Minute on Indian education. 1999, 56-62.‏

Manan, S. A. (2019). Myth of English teaching and learning: A study of practices in the low-cost schools in Pakistan. Asian Englishes, 21(2), 172-189.

Ohannessian, S., & Ansre, G. (1979). Some reflections on the educational use of sociolinguistic surveys. Sociolinguistic Aspects of Language Learning and Teaching, 57-70.

Pennycook, A. (1995). The cultural politics of English as an international language. Longman.

Pennycook, A. (1995). English in the world and the world in English. In: J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Power and inequality in language education (pp. 34-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pennycook, A. (2010). Critical and alternative directions in applied linguistics. Australian review of applied linguistics, 33(2), 16-1.‏

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. London: Oxford University Press.

Phillipson, R. (2003). English-Only Europe: Challenging Language Policy. London: Routledge.

Phillipson, R. (2009). English in Globalization, a Lingua Franca or a Lingua Frankensteinia? TESOL Quarterly, 43(2).

Phillipson, R. (2011). Robert Phillipson responds to Humphrey Tonkin's language and the ingenuity gap in science: The Empire of scientific English. Critical inquiry in language studies, 8(1), 117-124.

Phillipson, R. (2013). Linguistic imperialism continued. Routledge.

Phillipson, R. (2018). Chapter 12. English, the Lingua Nullius of global hegemony. In The politics of multilingualism: Europeanisation, globalization and linguistic governance (pp. 275-304). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rahman, T. (1996). Language and politics in Pakistan. Karachi, Pakistan: Oxford University Press.

Rahman, T. (2004). Denizens of alien worlds: A study of education, inequality, and polarization in Pakistan. OUP Pakistan.

Roshid, M. M., Haider, M. Z., & Begum, H. A. (2018). 13 Bangladeshi EFL Teachers’ Views on the English for Today Textbook. Creativity and innovations in ELT materials development: Looking beyond the current design, 58.

Rothkopf, D. (1997). In praise of cultural imperialism? Foreign policy, 38-53.‏

Seidlhofer, B. (2005). English as a Lingua Franca. ELT Journal, 59, 339-341.

Sen, A. (2011). Rights, laws and language. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 31(3), 437-453.

Shah, S. K., Tariq, W., and Bilal, M. (2013). Ideology in English textbooks: A case study of matric level books in Punjab. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(11), 113-120.

Trench, R. C., & Bailey, C. J. (n.d.). As cited in discussions on linguistic imperialism and cultural devaluation.

Trudgill, P. (1999). Language contact and the function of linguistic gender. Poznan studies in contemporary linguistics, 35, 133-152.

Wallerstein, I. (1991). World system versus world-systems: A critique. Critique of anthropology, 11(2), 189-194.

Walliman, N. (2011). Your research project: Designing and planning your work. Sage Publications.

Yamashita, H. (2001). Keigo kenkyūno ideorogii hihan [A critique of the ideology underlying honorific speech research]. In H. Yamashita &K. Noro (Eds.), ‘Tadashisa’ e no toi[Toward a questioning ‘correctness’] (pp. 51-83). Tokyo: Sangensha.

Zhang, Y., Ni, Z., Dong, J., and Li, J. (2022). Constructing the Global Diversity or Reproducing the Orientalist Gaze: Evaluating Identity Options and Cultural Elements in an English Intercultural Communication Textbook. English Language Teaching, 15(1), 130-14.

Publicado

2025-10-01

Edição

Seção

Estudos Linguísticos

Categorias