Integrando o GenAI no ensino da comunicação para a “geração prompt”: uma exploração das perspectivas acadêmicas sobre seus benefícios, desafios e perspectivas futuras na Turquia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2025.e103465Palavras-chave:
GenAI, Estudos de mídia, Educação em Comunicação, Geração prompt, Tecnologias educacionaisResumo
Objetivo: Este estudo investiga a integração da inteligência artificial generativa (GenAI) nas atividades educativas das faculdades de comunicação das três cidades mais populosas da Turquia: Istambul, Ankara e Izmir.
Método: Utilizando uma técnica robusta de entrevista semiestruturada em profundidade, um método de investigação qualitativa, realizámos entrevistas online com 15 académicos de faculdades de comunicação de universidades públicas e privadas.
Resultado: Os resultados, avaliados através da lente do Modelo de Aceitação de Tecnologia (TAM) e da Teoria da Difusão de Inovações (DIT), estão organizados em várias categorias: “O GenAI no contexto da aceitação da tecnologia”, ‘Primeiro encontro com o GenAI’, ‘Práticas de utilização em atividades académicas’, ‘Atitude dos académicos em relação à utilização do GenAI pelos estudantes’, ‘Potenciais benefícios e desafios’, ‘Políticas institucionais do GenAI’, ‘Políticas do GenAI no ensino superior da Turquia’ e ‘Previsões futuras’.
Conclusões: Os académicos referiram a utilização do GenAI em cursos teóricos e práticos, utilizando as suas capacidades criativas. No entanto, também expressaram uma posição crítica em relação a questões éticas, como imprecisões, conteúdos fabricados, preconceitos, potencial perda de criatividade e preocupações com os direitos de autor. Esta perspectiva crítica sublinha o seu empenho inabalável na utilização ética da GenAI, tranquilizando-os quanto à implementação responsável desta tecnologia. Os participantes sublinharam a importância de passar de uma educação baseada no conhecimento para uma educação baseada em competências para a “Geração Prompt” e previram um declínio significativo no emprego relacionado com as mídias no futuro.
Downloads
Referências
ADIGÜZEL, Tufan; KAYA, Mehmet Haldun; CANSU, Fatih Kürşat. Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, v. 15, n. 3, p. 1-13, 2023. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/13152. Available at: https://www.cedtech.net/download/revolutionizing-education-with-ai-exploring-the-transformative-potential-of-chatgpt-13152.pdf. Accessed on: September 13, 2024.
ALIER, Marc; GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, Francisco; CAMBA, Jorge D. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Deceptive to Disruptive. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education, p. 5-14, 2024. DOI: 10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.011. Available at: https://www.ijimai.org/journal/bibcite/reference/3436. Accessed on: August 15, 2024.
BAIDOO-ANU, David; ANSAH, Leticia Owusu. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 2023, v. 7 n. 1, p. 52-62, 2023. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4337484. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4337484. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
BASTANI, Hamsa; BASTANI, Osbert; SUNGU, Alp; GE, Haosen; KABAKCI, Özge & MARIMAN, Rei. Generative AI Can Harm Learning (July 15, 2024). The Wharton School Research Paper, 2024, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4895486. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4895486. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
BAYER, Judit. Legal implications of using generative AI in the media. Information & Communications Technology Law, v. 33, n. 3, p. 310-329, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/13600834.2024.2352694. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600834.2024.2352694?src=exp-la. Accessed on: September 5, 2024.
BOWEN, José Antonio; WATSON, C. Edward. Teaching with AI: A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges and Universities, 2024.
CECIL, Jessica. Round tables on AI and the global news industry. The Reuters Institute for The Study of Journalism, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk. A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, v. 20 n. 38, p. 1-25, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3. Available at: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk; COLLOTON, Tom. Strengths and weaknesses in embracing ChatGPT in curriculum design. Routledge, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk; LEE, Katherine K. W. The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart learning environments, v. 10 n. 60, p. 1-23, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3. Available at: https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3#citeas. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk; HU, Wenjie. Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 20 n. 43, p. 1-18, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8. Available at: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8. Accessed on: September 8, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk; TSI, Louisa H.Y. The AI revolution in education: Will AI replace or assist teachers in higher education? arXiv preprint, arXiv:2305.01185, p. 1-18, 2023. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.01185. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01185. Accessed on: October 8, 2024.
CHING, Yu-Hui; HSU, Yu-Chang; HUNG, Andy. Introduction to the Special Section on Integrating Generative AI in Education. TechTrends, v. 68, p. 771–772, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-024-00990-x. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-024-00990-x. Accessed on: October 5, 2024.
CUBAN, Larry. The Flight of a Butterfly or the Path of a Bullet? Using technology to transform teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press: Cambridge, 2018.
DAVIS, Fred D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, v. 13, n. 3, p. 319-340, 1989. DOI: 10.2307/249008. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/249008. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
DE VRIES, Alex. The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence. Joule, v. 7, n. 10, p. 2191-2194, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2023.09.004. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435123003653. Accessed on: October 5, 2024.
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY OF THE REPUBLIC OF TÜRKİYE. National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2021-2025. 2021. Available at: https://cbddo.gov.tr/uyzs. Accessed on: September 1, 2024.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION- Youth Policy in Turkey. YouthWiki. Available at: https://national-policies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/turkey/overview. Accessed on: March 21, 2024.
GHIMIRE, Aashish; EDWARDS, John. Generative AI Adoption in Classroom in Context of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT). arXiv preprint, arXiv:2406.15360, 2024. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.15360. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15360. Accessed on: September 19, 2024.
GOOGLE. Our next-generation model: Gemini 1.5. 2024. Available at: https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-gemini- next-generation-model-february-2024/#sundar-note. Accessed on: May 20, 2024.
HARRER, Stefan. Attention is not all you need: the complicated case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicine. EBioMedicine, v. 90, p. 104512, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396423000774. Accessed on: September 17, 2024.
HSU, Yu-Chang; CHING, Yu-Hui. Generative artificial intelligence in education, part one: The dynamic frontier. TechTrends, v. 67, n. 4, p. 603-607, 2023. Accessed on: September 17, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-023-00863-9. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-023-00863-9. Accessed on: September 17, 2024.
İPEK, Ziyaeddin Halid; GÖZÜM, Ali İbrahim Can; PAPADAKIS, Stamatios; KALLOGIANNAKIS, Michail. Educational Applications of the ChatGPT AI System: A Systematic Review Research. Educational Process: International Journal, v.12, n. 3, p. 26-55, 2023. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1134496. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
İRVAN, Süleyman. Türkiye’de iletişim fakülteleri: Listeye her yıl yenileri ekleniyor, NewsLab Turkey. 2023. Available at: https://www.newslabturkey.org/2023/08/07/turkiyede-iletisim-fakulteleri-listeye-her-yil-yenileri ekleniyor/#:~:text=2023%2D2024%20e%C4%9Fitim%20y%C4%B1l%C4%B1%20itibariyle,katarsak%20say%C4%B1%2067'ye%20y%C3%BCkseliyor. Accessed on: August 7, 2024.
KELLY MURPHY, Samantha. ChatGPT passes exams from law and business schools. CNN Business. 2023. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/26/ tech/chatgpt‐passes‐exams/index.html. Accessed on: 15 August 2023.
KEMP, Simon. Digital 2024: Turkey, 23 February 2024. DATAREPORTAL. Available at: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-turkey. Accessed on: September 13, 2024.
KOHNKE, Lucas; MOORHOUSE, Benjamin Luke; ZOU, Di. Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 5, p. 100-156, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100156. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X23000358. Accessed on: September 19, 2024.
LANGRAN, Elizabeth; SEARSON, Michael; TRUMBLE, Jason. Transforming teacher education in the age of generative AI. In: Exploring New Horizons: Generative Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Education, v. 2, p. 2-13, 2024. Accessed on: August 30, 2024.
LIM, Weng Marc; GUNASEKARA, Asanka; PALLANT, Jessica Leigh; PALLANT, Jason Ian; PECHENKINA, Ekaterina. Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, v. 21, n. 2, p. 100790, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811723000289. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
LO, Leo S. The CLEAR path: A framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, v. 49, n. 4, p. 102720, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133323000599?via%3Dihub. Accessed on: September 23, 2024.
LODGE, Jason M; THOMPSON, Kate; CORRIN, Linda. Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8695. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
LUO (JESS), Jiahui. A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 49, n. 5, p. 1-14, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
MAERTEN, Anne-Sofie; SOYDANER, Derya. From paintbrush to pixel: A review of deep neural networks in AI-generated art. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2302.10913, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.10913. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
MAHAJAN, Viraj. 100+ Incredible ChatGPT Statistics & Facts in 2024. Notta. Available at: https://www.notta.ai/en/blog/chatgpt-statistics. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
MALIK, Agung Rinaldy; PRATIWI, Yuni; ANDAJANI, Kusubakti; NUMERTAYASA, I Wayan; SUHARTI, Sri; DARWIS, Arisa; MARZUKI. Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: higher education student's perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, v.5, 100296, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000717. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
MCLUHAN, Marshall. Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT Press, 1964.
MIZUMOTO, Atsushi; EGUCHI, Masaki. Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, v. 2, n. 2, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766123000101. Accessed on: September 13, 2024.
MISHRA, Punya; HEATH, Marie K. The (Neil) postman always rings twice: 5 questions on AI and education. In: Exploring New Horizons: Generative Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Education, 2024. p. 14-24.
NEUMAN, W. Lawrence. Basics of social research. 2007.
OpenAI. Hello GPT-4o. OpenAi. 2024. Available at: https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/. Accessed on: May 20, 2024.
ONEBUNNE, Amaka Peace. Journalists’ perception of artificial intelligence: the case of Nigerian newsrooms. 2024. Master's Thesis - Northern Illinois University, 2024.
PERES, Renana; SCHREIER, Martin; SCHWEIDEL, David; SORESCU, Alina. On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, v. 40, n. 2, p. 269-275, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811623000162. Accessed on: September 20, 2024.
ROGERS, Everett M. Bibliography on the Diffusion of Innovations. 1962.
ROLÁN, Luis Xabier Martínez; CORBACHO-VALENCIA, Juan-Manuel; OTERO, Teresa Piñeiro. Use of generative AIs in the digital communication and marketing sector in Spain. In: Management for Digital Transformation. Springer Suiza, 2024. p. 101-121.
PURTILL, J. ChatGPT appears to pass medical school exams. Educators are now rethinking assessments. ABC News. 2023. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2023-01-12/chatgpt-generative-ai-program-passes-us-medical-licensing-exams/101840938. Accessed on: August 15, 2024.
SCHIFF, Daniel. Education for AI, not AI for education: The role of education and ethics in national AI policy strategies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, v. 32, n. 3, p. 527-563, 2022. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2. Accessed on: September 2, 2024.
ST GEORGE, D.; SVRLUGA, S. Artificial intelligence is already changing how teachers teach. The Washington Post, 2023. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/07/13/ai-education-teachers-lesson-plans/ Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
STOJANOV, Ana. Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a more knowledgeable other: An autoethnographic study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 20, n. 35, 2023. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-023-00404-7. Accessed on: August 29, 2024.
TEUBNER, Timm; FLATH, M. Christoph; WEINHARDT, Christof; VAN DER AALST, Wil; HINZ, Oliver. Welcome to the era of chatgpt et al. the prospects of large language models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, v. 65, n. 2, p. 95-101, 2023. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12599-023-00795-x. Accessed on: September 10, 2024.
TRUST, Torrey; MALOY, Robert William; HIKMATULLAH, Nanak. Integrating AI in T-teacher education using the teacher educator technology competencies. In: Exploring New Horizons: Generative Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Education, 2024. p. 26-38.
TRUST, Torrey; CARPENTER, Jeffrey; HEATH, Marie; KRUTKA, Daniel G. Toward critical and ecological dispositions in technology decision making in teacher education. 2023. EdArXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/4ecn2. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
VAN WYK, Micheal M. Is ChatGPT an opportunity or a threat? Preventive strategies employed by academics related to a GenAI-based LLM at a faculty of education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, v. 7, n. 1, 2024. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/index. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
YILMAZ, Ramazan; YILMAZ KARAOGLAN, Fatma Gizem. The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students' computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 4, p.100147, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X23000267. Accessed on: September 10, 2024.
YUSUF, Abdullahi; PERVIN, Nasrin; ROMÁN-GONZÁLEZ, Marcos. Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 21, n. 21, p. 1-29, 2024. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
WARSCHAUER, Mark; TSENG, Waverly; YIM, Soobin; WEBSTER, Thomas; JACOB Sharin; DU, Qian; TATE, Tamara. The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, v. 62, 2023. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4404380. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
YÖK. “Yükseköğretim Kurumlari Bilimsel Araştirma Ve Yayin Faaliyetlerinde Üretken Yapay Zekâ Kullanimina Dair Etik Rehber.” YÖK. 2024. Available at: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/2024/yapay-zeka-kullanimina-dair-etik-rehber.pdf. Accessed on: September 29, 2024.
Arquivos adicionais
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Bilge Şenyüz, Ebru Özgen, Anıl Uğur Oğuzcan

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
O autor deve garantir:
- que haja um consenso completo de todos os coautores em aprovar a versão final do documento e sua submissão para publicação.
- que seu trabalho é original, e se o trabalho e/ou palavras de outras pessoas foram utilizados, estas foram devidamente reconhecidas.
Plágio em todas as suas formas constituem um comportamento antiético de publicação e é inaceitável. Encontros Bibli reserva-se o direito de usar software ou quaisquer outros métodos de detecção de plágio.
Todas as submissões recebidas para avaliação na revista Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação passam por identificação de plágio e autoplágio. Plágios identificados em manuscritos durante o processo de avaliação acarretarão no arquivamento da submissão. No caso de identificação de plágio em um manuscrito publicado na revista, o Editor Chefe conduzirá uma investigação preliminar e, caso necessário, fará a retratação.
Esta revista, seguindo as recomendações do movimento de Acesso Aberto, proporciona seu conteúdo em Full Open Access. Assim os autores conservam todos seus direitos permitindo que a Encontros Bibli possa publicar seus artigos e disponibilizar pra toda a comunidade.
Os conteúdos de Encontros Bibli estão licenciados sob uma Licença Creative Commons 4.0 by.
Qualquer usuário tem direito de:
- Compartilhar — copiar, baixar, imprimir ou redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato
- Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
De acordo com os seguintes termos:
- Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de maneira alguma que sugira ao licenciante a apoiar você ou o seu uso.
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.