Integrating GenAI into communication education for ‘generation prompt’: an exploration of academics' perspectives on its benefits, challenges, and future prospects in Turkiye
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2025.e103465Keywords:
GenAI, Media studies, Communication Education, Generation prompt, Education technologiesAbstract
Objective: This study investigates the integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into educational activities in communication faculties across the three most populous cities in Türkiye: Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir.
Methods: Using a robust semi-structured in-depth interview technique, a qualitative research method, we conducted online interviews with 15 academics from communication faculties in state and private universities.
Results: The findings, evaluated through the lens of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Diffusion of Innovations Theory (DIT), are organized into several categories: "GenAI in the context of technology acceptance," "First encounter with GenAI," "Practices of use in academic activities," " Academics attitude towards students’ use of GenAI," "Potential benefits and challenges," "Institutional GenAI policies," "GenAI policies in Türkiye’s higher education," and "Future predictions."
Conclusions: Academics reported using GenAI in both theoretical and practical courses, utilizing its creative capabilities. However, they also expressed a critical stance on ethical issues, such as inaccuracies, fabricated content, bias, potential loss of creativity, and copyright concerns. This critical perspective underscores their unwavering commitment to the ethical use of GenAI, reassuring about the responsible implementation of GenAI. Participants emphasized the importance of shifting from knowledge-based to skill-based education for the "Generation Prompt," and predicted a significant decline in media-related employment in the future.
Downloads
References
ADIGÜZEL, Tufan; KAYA, Mehmet Haldun; CANSU, Fatih Kürşat. Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, v. 15, n. 3, p. 1-13, 2023. DOI: 10.30935/cedtech/13152. Available at: https://www.cedtech.net/download/revolutionizing-education-with-ai-exploring-the-transformative-potential-of-chatgpt-13152.pdf. Accessed on: September 13, 2024.
ALIER, Marc; GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, Francisco; CAMBA, Jorge D. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Deceptive to Disruptive. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue on Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education, p. 5-14, 2024. DOI: 10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.011. Available at: https://www.ijimai.org/journal/bibcite/reference/3436. Accessed on: August 15, 2024.
BAIDOO-ANU, David; ANSAH, Leticia Owusu. Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 2023, v. 7 n. 1, p. 52-62, 2023. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4337484. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4337484. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
BASTANI, Hamsa; BASTANI, Osbert; SUNGU, Alp; GE, Haosen; KABAKCI, Özge & MARIMAN, Rei. Generative AI Can Harm Learning (July 15, 2024). The Wharton School Research Paper, 2024, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4895486. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4895486. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
BAYER, Judit. Legal implications of using generative AI in the media. Information & Communications Technology Law, v. 33, n. 3, p. 310-329, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/13600834.2024.2352694. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13600834.2024.2352694?src=exp-la. Accessed on: September 5, 2024.
BOWEN, José Antonio; WATSON, C. Edward. Teaching with AI: A Practical Guide to a New Era of Human Learning. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges and Universities, 2024.
CECIL, Jessica. Round tables on AI and the global news industry. The Reuters Institute for The Study of Journalism, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk. A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, v. 20 n. 38, p. 1-25, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3. Available at: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk; COLLOTON, Tom. Strengths and weaknesses in embracing ChatGPT in curriculum design. Routledge, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk; LEE, Katherine K. W. The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart learning environments, v. 10 n. 60, p. 1-23, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3. Available at: https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3#citeas. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk; HU, Wenjie. Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 20 n. 43, p. 1-18, 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8. Available at: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8. Accessed on: September 8, 2024.
CHAN, Cecilia Ka Yuk; TSI, Louisa H.Y. The AI revolution in education: Will AI replace or assist teachers in higher education? arXiv preprint, arXiv:2305.01185, p. 1-18, 2023. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2305.01185. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.01185. Accessed on: October 8, 2024.
CHING, Yu-Hui; HSU, Yu-Chang; HUNG, Andy. Introduction to the Special Section on Integrating Generative AI in Education. TechTrends, v. 68, p. 771–772, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-024-00990-x. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-024-00990-x. Accessed on: October 5, 2024.
CUBAN, Larry. The Flight of a Butterfly or the Path of a Bullet? Using technology to transform teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press: Cambridge, 2018.
DAVIS, Fred D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, v. 13, n. 3, p. 319-340, 1989. DOI: 10.2307/249008. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/249008. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
DE VRIES, Alex. The growing energy footprint of artificial intelligence. Joule, v. 7, n. 10, p. 2191-2194, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2023.09.004. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435123003653. Accessed on: October 5, 2024.
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY OF THE REPUBLIC OF TÜRKİYE. National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2021-2025. 2021. Available at: https://cbddo.gov.tr/uyzs. Accessed on: September 1, 2024.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION- Youth Policy in Turkey. YouthWiki. Available at: https://national-policies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/turkey/overview. Accessed on: March 21, 2024.
GHIMIRE, Aashish; EDWARDS, John. Generative AI Adoption in Classroom in Context of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT). arXiv preprint, arXiv:2406.15360, 2024. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.15360. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15360. Accessed on: September 19, 2024.
GOOGLE. Our next-generation model: Gemini 1.5. 2024. Available at: https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-gemini- next-generation-model-february-2024/#sundar-note. Accessed on: May 20, 2024.
HARRER, Stefan. Attention is not all you need: the complicated case of ethically using large language models in healthcare and medicine. EBioMedicine, v. 90, p. 104512, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396423000774. Accessed on: September 17, 2024.
HSU, Yu-Chang; CHING, Yu-Hui. Generative artificial intelligence in education, part one: The dynamic frontier. TechTrends, v. 67, n. 4, p. 603-607, 2023. Accessed on: September 17, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-023-00863-9. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11528-023-00863-9. Accessed on: September 17, 2024.
İPEK, Ziyaeddin Halid; GÖZÜM, Ali İbrahim Can; PAPADAKIS, Stamatios; KALLOGIANNAKIS, Michail. Educational Applications of the ChatGPT AI System: A Systematic Review Research. Educational Process: International Journal, v.12, n. 3, p. 26-55, 2023. Available at: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1134496. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
İRVAN, Süleyman. Türkiye’de iletişim fakülteleri: Listeye her yıl yenileri ekleniyor, NewsLab Turkey. 2023. Available at: https://www.newslabturkey.org/2023/08/07/turkiyede-iletisim-fakulteleri-listeye-her-yil-yenileri ekleniyor/#:~:text=2023%2D2024%20e%C4%9Fitim%20y%C4%B1l%C4%B1%20itibariyle,katarsak%20say%C4%B1%2067'ye%20y%C3%BCkseliyor. Accessed on: August 7, 2024.
KELLY MURPHY, Samantha. ChatGPT passes exams from law and business schools. CNN Business. 2023. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/26/ tech/chatgpt‐passes‐exams/index.html. Accessed on: 15 August 2023.
KEMP, Simon. Digital 2024: Turkey, 23 February 2024. DATAREPORTAL. Available at: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-turkey. Accessed on: September 13, 2024.
KOHNKE, Lucas; MOORHOUSE, Benjamin Luke; ZOU, Di. Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 5, p. 100-156, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100156. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X23000358. Accessed on: September 19, 2024.
LANGRAN, Elizabeth; SEARSON, Michael; TRUMBLE, Jason. Transforming teacher education in the age of generative AI. In: Exploring New Horizons: Generative Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Education, v. 2, p. 2-13, 2024. Accessed on: August 30, 2024.
LIM, Weng Marc; GUNASEKARA, Asanka; PALLANT, Jessica Leigh; PALLANT, Jason Ian; PECHENKINA, Ekaterina. Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, v. 21, n. 2, p. 100790, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811723000289. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
LO, Leo S. The CLEAR path: A framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, v. 49, n. 4, p. 102720, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133323000599?via%3Dihub. Accessed on: September 23, 2024.
LODGE, Jason M; THOMPSON, Kate; CORRIN, Linda. Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8695. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
LUO (JESS), Jiahui. A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 49, n. 5, p. 1-14, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
MAERTEN, Anne-Sofie; SOYDANER, Derya. From paintbrush to pixel: A review of deep neural networks in AI-generated art. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2302.10913, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.10913. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
MAHAJAN, Viraj. 100+ Incredible ChatGPT Statistics & Facts in 2024. Notta. Available at: https://www.notta.ai/en/blog/chatgpt-statistics. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
MALIK, Agung Rinaldy; PRATIWI, Yuni; ANDAJANI, Kusubakti; NUMERTAYASA, I Wayan; SUHARTI, Sri; DARWIS, Arisa; MARZUKI. Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: higher education student's perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, v.5, 100296, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000717. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
MCLUHAN, Marshall. Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT Press, 1964.
MIZUMOTO, Atsushi; EGUCHI, Masaki. Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, v. 2, n. 2, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766123000101. Accessed on: September 13, 2024.
MISHRA, Punya; HEATH, Marie K. The (Neil) postman always rings twice: 5 questions on AI and education. In: Exploring New Horizons: Generative Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Education, 2024. p. 14-24.
NEUMAN, W. Lawrence. Basics of social research. 2007.
OpenAI. Hello GPT-4o. OpenAi. 2024. Available at: https://openai.com/index/hello-gpt-4o/. Accessed on: May 20, 2024.
ONEBUNNE, Amaka Peace. Journalists’ perception of artificial intelligence: the case of Nigerian newsrooms. 2024. Master's Thesis - Northern Illinois University, 2024.
PERES, Renana; SCHREIER, Martin; SCHWEIDEL, David; SORESCU, Alina. On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, v. 40, n. 2, p. 269-275, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811623000162. Accessed on: September 20, 2024.
ROGERS, Everett M. Bibliography on the Diffusion of Innovations. 1962.
ROLÁN, Luis Xabier Martínez; CORBACHO-VALENCIA, Juan-Manuel; OTERO, Teresa Piñeiro. Use of generative AIs in the digital communication and marketing sector in Spain. In: Management for Digital Transformation. Springer Suiza, 2024. p. 101-121.
PURTILL, J. ChatGPT appears to pass medical school exams. Educators are now rethinking assessments. ABC News. 2023. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2023-01-12/chatgpt-generative-ai-program-passes-us-medical-licensing-exams/101840938. Accessed on: August 15, 2024.
SCHIFF, Daniel. Education for AI, not AI for education: The role of education and ethics in national AI policy strategies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, v. 32, n. 3, p. 527-563, 2022. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40593-021-00270-2. Accessed on: September 2, 2024.
ST GEORGE, D.; SVRLUGA, S. Artificial intelligence is already changing how teachers teach. The Washington Post, 2023. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/07/13/ai-education-teachers-lesson-plans/ Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
STOJANOV, Ana. Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a more knowledgeable other: An autoethnographic study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 20, n. 35, 2023. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-023-00404-7. Accessed on: August 29, 2024.
TEUBNER, Timm; FLATH, M. Christoph; WEINHARDT, Christof; VAN DER AALST, Wil; HINZ, Oliver. Welcome to the era of chatgpt et al. the prospects of large language models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, v. 65, n. 2, p. 95-101, 2023. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12599-023-00795-x. Accessed on: September 10, 2024.
TRUST, Torrey; MALOY, Robert William; HIKMATULLAH, Nanak. Integrating AI in T-teacher education using the teacher educator technology competencies. In: Exploring New Horizons: Generative Artificial Intelligence and Teacher Education, 2024. p. 26-38.
TRUST, Torrey; CARPENTER, Jeffrey; HEATH, Marie; KRUTKA, Daniel G. Toward critical and ecological dispositions in technology decision making in teacher education. 2023. EdArXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/4ecn2. Accessed on: September 14, 2024.
VAN WYK, Micheal M. Is ChatGPT an opportunity or a threat? Preventive strategies employed by academics related to a GenAI-based LLM at a faculty of education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, v. 7, n. 1, 2024. Available at: http://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/index. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
YILMAZ, Ramazan; YILMAZ KARAOGLAN, Fatma Gizem. The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students' computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 4, p.100147, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X23000267. Accessed on: September 10, 2024.
YUSUF, Abdullahi; PERVIN, Nasrin; ROMÁN-GONZÁLEZ, Marcos. Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 21, n. 21, p. 1-29, 2024. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6. Accessed on: September 16, 2024.
WARSCHAUER, Mark; TSENG, Waverly; YIM, Soobin; WEBSTER, Thomas; JACOB Sharin; DU, Qian; TATE, Tamara. The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, v. 62, 2023. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4404380. Accessed on: September 15, 2024.
YÖK. “Yükseköğretim Kurumlari Bilimsel Araştirma Ve Yayin Faaliyetlerinde Üretken Yapay Zekâ Kullanimina Dair Etik Rehber.” YÖK. 2024. Available at: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/2024/yapay-zeka-kullanimina-dair-etik-rehber.pdf. Accessed on: September 29, 2024.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bilge Şenyüz, Ebru Özgen, Anıl Uğur Oğuzcan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.