What are gender studies: characterization of scientific output self-named gender studies in a multidisciplinary and international database
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2020.e71677Keywords:
Gender studies, Scientific output, Bibliometrics, Web of Science, Gender, ScientometricsAbstract
Objective: The research objective is to describe the research that entitles itself as “gender studies” in a multidisciplinary and international database, pointing out possibilities and limitations for this kind of source.
Method: Exploratory study with bibliometric analysis of the scientific output self-named gender studies indexed at Web of Science and published before 2017.
Results: The results mirror the area’s history, with documents identified in the base since 1981 and growing until recent years. It points out the diversity of areas that research gender studies, especially knowledge areas connected to the humanities and social sciences, but also from areas such as health and medical sciences. The number of publications has increased since the 90’s as well as it's interdisciplinarity since the number of areas that publish gender studies has also increased. The analysis comparing different periods demonstrates the following: an increase of co-authored publications; different areas “joining” gender studies; more general and multidisciplinary journals publishing self-named gender studies, and the increase of journals devoted specifically to the area. It also identifies the important impact of proceeding papers and dispersion of publication vehicles. The USA and European countries are the most productive ones, however, Brazil, Argentina, and Australia stand out by having some of the most productive institutions and publication sources. The terms analysis point to researches related to education and teaching, and the importance of post-structuralism influenced topics. Masculinity and sexuality-related research have increased their frequency in the publications over the years, however, sexuality papers are much rarer, while words such as male and masculinity appear within the most frequent terms and in the publications with more citations. Subjects and terms of the publications also suggest that gender studies, as it could be expected, are following the matters of the feminist movements.
Conclusions: The gender studies' scientific output at Web of Science demonstrates the area’s consolidation over the years and its recognition among knowledge fields as different disciplines have joined it. Despite many interesting and pertinent characteristics were raised, the database coverage for this kind of research is limited. The data quality is also a limitation as many data fields were missing, especially for documents of the humanities and social sciences. Lastly, we suggest the usage of additional terms for future research.
Downloads
References
BUTLER, Judith. Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Rotledge, 1993.
BUTLER, Judith. O gênero é uma instituição social mutável e histórica. Revista do Instituto Humanitas Unisinos, v. 6, n. 199, 2006.
CLARIVATE ANALYTICS. Scope notes. 2017a.
CLARIVATE ANALYTICS. Web of Science Core Collection: list of field tags in output. 2017b.
CLARIVATE ANALYTICS. Searching document type field. 2017c
CLARIVATE ANALYTICS. InCites Journal Citation Reports [2017]. 2017d.
CLARIVATE ANALYTICS. Pesquisando no campo tópico. 201a.
CONWAY, Jill K.; BOURQUE, Susan C.; SCOTT, Joan W. Introduction: the concept of gender. Daedalus, v. 116, n. 4, p. 21–30, 1987.
CROSS, Di; THOMSON, Simon; SIBCLAIR, Alexandra. Research in Brazil: a report for CAPES by Clarivate Analytics. [s. l.]: Clarivate Analytics, 2018.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Histoire de la sexualité: la volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard, 1976.
FREEDMAN, Estelle B. No turning back: the history of feminism and the future of women. New York: Ballantine Books, 2003.
HARAWAY, Donna. “Gender” for a marxist dictionary: the sexual politics of a word. In: Women, gender, religion: a reader. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001. p. 49-75.
HOPPEN, Natascha Helena Franz; SOUZA, Cláudia Daniele De; DE FILIPPO, Daniela; VANZ, Samile Andréa de Souza; SANZ-CASADO, Elías. Brazilian neurosciences research areas: a bibliometric analysis from 2006 to 2013. Informação e Sociedade, João Pessoa, v. 26, n. 3, p. 95–104, 2016.
HUANG, Mu-hsuan; CHANG, Yu-wei. Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New York, v. 59, n. 11, p. 1819–1828, 2008.
LOURO, Guacira Lopes. Um corpo estranho: ensaios sobre sexualidade e teoria queer. 2. ed. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2007.
MEADOWS, Arthur Jack. A comunicação científica. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos, 1999.
MENDLOWICZ, Mauro Vitor; COUTINHO, Evandro Silva Freire; LAKS, Jerson; FONTENELLE, Leonardo Franklin; VALENÇA, Alexandre Martins; BERGER, William;
FIGUEIRA, Ivan; AGUIAR, Gláucia Azambuja De. Is there a “gender gap” in authorship of the main Brazilian psychiatric journals at the beginning of the 21st century? Scientometrics, Dordrecht, v. 86, n. 1, p. 27–37, 2011.
MICELI, Sérgio. A Fundação Ford e os cientistas sociais no Brasil, 1962-1992. In: MICELI, Sérgio (Ed.). Histórias das Ciências Sociais no Brasil. São Paulo: Sumaré, 1995. v. 2p. 341–396.
MONGEON, Philippe; PAUL-HUS, Adèle. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, Hoboken, v. 106, n. 1, p. 213–228, 2016.
MOZAFFARIAN, Mehrnoush; JAMALI, Hamid R. Iranian women in science: a gender study of scientific productivity in an Islamic country. Aslib Proceedings, Bingley, v. 60, n. 5, p. 463–473, 2008.
NIELSEN, Mathias W. Limits to meritocracy? Gender in academic recruitment and promotion processes. Science and Public Policy, Oxford, v. 43, n. 3, p. 386–399, 2016.
PAN, Len; KALINAKI, Elizabeth. Mapping gender in the German research arena: a report conducted by Elsevier. [S.l.]: Elsevier, 2015.
PISCITELLI, Adriana. Gênero: a história de um conceito. In: ALMEIDA, Heloísa Albuquerque De; SZWAKO, José Eduardo (Eds.). Diferenças, igualdade. São Paulo: Berlendis & Vertecchia, 2009. p. 116–148.
RUBIN, Gayle. O tráfico de mulheres: notas sobre a “economia política” do sexo. Recife: SOS Corpo, 1993.
RUBIN, Gayle. Thinking sex: notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: Culture, society and sexuality: a reader. London: UCL Press, 1999. p. 143–178.
SCOTT, Joan W. Gender: a useful category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review, Bloomington, v. 91, n. 5, p. 1053–1075. 1986.
SCOTT, Joan W. The uses and abuses of gender. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, Amsterdam, v. 16, n. 1, p. 63–77, 2013.
SILVA, Susana Veleda da. Os estudos de gênero no Brasil: algumas considerações. Biblio 3W: revista bibliográfica de geografía y ciencias sociales, Barcelona, v. 5, n. 262, 2000.
SÖDERLUND, Therese; MADISON, Guy. Characteristics of gender studies publications: a bibliometric analysis based on a Swedish population database. Scientometrics, Dordrecht, v. 105, n. 3, p. 1347–1387, 2015.
VANZ, Samile Andréa de Souza. As redes de colaboração científica no Brasil (2004-2006). 2009. Tese (Doutorado em Comunicação e Informação) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2009.
VIEIRA, Ana Sara; COELHO, Ana Júlia; MIQUELINO, Ana Sofia; CALADO, Pedro. Faces de Eva: uma análise bibliométrica. Faces de Eva: estudos sobre a mulher, Lisboa, n. 36, p. 34–60, 2016.
WEBSTER, Berenika M. Polish women in science: a bibliometric analysis of Polish science and its publications, 1980–1999. Research Evaluation, Oxford, v. 10, n. 3, p. 185–194, 2001.
WEEKS, Jeffrey. O corpo e a sexualidade. In: LOURO, Guacira Lopes (Ed.). O corpo educado: pedagogias da sexualidade. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2015. p. 35–82.
WUCHTY, Stefan; JONES, Benjamin F.; UZZI, Brian. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, v. 316, n. 5827, p. 1036–1039, 2007.
ZIJLSTRA, Iris. The turbulent evolution of homosexuality: from mental illness to sexual preference. Social Cosmos, Utrecht, v. 5, n. 1, p. 29–35, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Natascha Helena Franz Hoppen, Samile Andrea de Souza Vanz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.