Logical interpretant and domain determination in information science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2025.e99815Keywords:
Logical interpretant, Peirce's pragmatism, Domain analysisAbstract
Objetivo: To analyze the logical interpretant conceived by Peirce, and the construction of dominance from pragmatism. The explanation of Peirce's scientific method offers subsidies for the treatment of domain, and here it is described not only as a tool, but as a possibility for generating knowledge.
Methods: A theoretical retrieval of the Domain Analysis developed by Hjørland and Albrechtsen, related to Information Science, Information Organization and Knowledge Organization, was carried out. The materials that contributed to the preparation of the article were retrieved from Brapci, Dialnet, Google Scholar, Nomos eLibrary, and ISKO databases.
Results: It presents in a punctual way the scientific method called pragmatism by Peirce, in an effort to establish the argumentation of the process of signification of phenomena in a systematic way. It describes the architecture of the sciences, and the phenomenological categories in which the role of semiotics, as a logical treatment, is fundamental for the interdisciplinarity of the scientific method. The definition of interpretant associated with the conception of concept, in the structure of meaning of the analysis and determination of domain is a plausible approach in Information Science, influencing the organization of information and knowledge
Conclusions: The central argument is the analogy between the evolutionary development of the sign, which is considered a process in which the results depend on the conduct, similar to which the domain is proposed, thus offering a scientific methodology to combine information retrieval and knowledge generation, so the similarity between the methods analyzed can have scientific use.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, C. C de. Epistemologia da organização do conhecimento: Um novo velho paradigma. In: Organização do Conhecimento no Horizonte 2030: Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Saúde / coord. por Carlos Guardado da Silva, Jorge Revez, Luis Corujo, ISBN 978-989-566-137-4, p.663-680, 2021. Disponível em: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8411177. Acesso: 20 jul. 2024.
ALMEIDA, C. C. Sobre o pensamento de Peirce e a organização da informação e do conhecimento. Liinc em Revista, Rio de Janeiro, v. 7, n. 1, p. 104-120, 2011. Disponível em: http://revista.ibict.br/liinc/article/view/3291. Acesso em: 3 jun. 2024.
ALMEIDA, C. C. The Methodological Influence of Peirce's Pragmatism on Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, [S.l.], v. 39, n. 3, p. 204-215, 2012. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/10575. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2024.
ALMEIDA, C. C. El concepto como signo: elemento semiótico para el análisis y mediación de información. Scire: representación y organización del conocimiento, Saragoça, v. 18, n. 2, p. 49-55, 2012a. Disponível em: https://www.ibersid.eu/ojs/index.php/scire/article/view/3961. Acesso em: 14 ago. 2024.
BARROS, T. H. B.; FERREIRA LAIPELT, R. do C. Uma análise de domínio da área de Organização e Representação do Conhecimento no contexto do periódico Em Questão. Em Questão, Porto Alegre, v. 27, n. 4, p. 438–468, 2021. DOI: 10.19132/1808-5245274.438-468. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/116729. Acesso em: 26 jul. 2024.
BAWDEN, D; ROBINSON, L. Introduction to information science. Londres: Facet, 2012.
BORKO, H. Information science: what is it?. American documentation, v.19, n.1, p.3-5, 1969. Disponível em: https://www.marilia.unesp.br/Home/Instituicao/Docentes/EdbertoFerneda/k---artigo-01.pdf Acesso em 20 de jul. 2024.
BRASCHER, M; CAFÉ, L. Organização da informação ou organização do conhecimento? In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DA PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 9., 2008, São Paulo. Anais [...]… São Paulo: ANCIB, 2008. Disponível em: https://skat.ihmc.us/rid=1KR7TM7S9-S3HDKP-5STP/BRASCHER%20CAF%C3%89(2008)-1835.pdf Acesso em 28 de ago. 2024.
DAHLBERG, I. Teoria do conceito. Tradução Astério Tavares Campos. Ci. Inf., Rio de Janeiro, v. 7, n. 2, p. 101-107, 1978. Disponível em: https://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/115 Acesso em 20 de jul. 2024.
DE TIENNE, A. Information in formation: a peircean approach. Cognitio, São Paulo, v. 6, n. 2, p. 149-165, jul./dez. 2015. Disponível em: https://philpapers.org/rec/DETIIF Acesso em 15 de jul. 2024.
GUIMARÃES, J. A. C. Análise de domínio como perspectiva metodológica em organização da informação. Ciência da informação, 43(1), 2014. Disponível em: https://www.revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/1415/ Acesso em 07 de jul. 2024.
HJØRLAND, B; ALBRECHTSEN, Hanne. Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain‐analysis. Journal of the American society for information science, v. 46, n. 6, p. 400-425, 1995. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/. Acesso em 25 jun. 2024.
HJØRLAND, B. Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches–traditional as well as innovative. Journal of documentation, v. 58, n. 4, p. 422-462, 2002. Disponível em: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=ba8b7128dcb6b6015d80d1d0ab44a2869606c3fc Acesso em 01 de jul. 2024.
HJORLAND, B. Fundamentals of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, v. 30, n. 2, p. 87-111, 2003. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Birger-Hjorland/publication/285929806_Fundamentals_of_Knowledge_Organization/links/604616ae299bf1e07864ded7/Fundamentals-of-Knowledge-Organization.pdf Acesso em 01 de jul. 2024.
HJØRLAND, B. Theories of knowledge organization—theories of knowledge. Knowledge Organization, v. 40, n. 3, p. 169-181, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Birger-Hjorland/publication/286880069_Theories_of_knowledge_organization_-_Theories_of_knowledge/links/569a6ae508aeeea9859cc655/Theories-of-knowledge-organization-Theories-of-knowledge.pdf Acesso em 12 de jul. 2024.
LE COADIC, Y. A ciência da informação. 2.ed. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos, 2004. 124 p., il.
NÖTH, W; GURICK, A. A teoria da informação de Charles S. Peirce. TECCOGS: Revista Digital de Tecnologias Cognitivas, São Paulo, v. 5, p. 01-29, 2011. Disponível em: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/teccogs/article/view/52894 Acesso em 25 de jun. 2024 .
MAI, J. The concept of subject in a semiotic light. In: CHWARTS, C.; RORVIG, M. (ed.). Didital collections: implications for users, funders, developers and maintainers. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 1997a. p. 54-64.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING-AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE. LEARNED INFORMATION (EUROPE) LTD, 1997. p. 54-66.Disponível em: https://jenserikmai.info/Papers/1997_TheConceptOfSubjectInASemioticLight.pdf. Acesso em 13 de jul. 2024.
MAI, J. The subject indexing process: an investigation of problems in knowledge representation. 357 fls. Dissertação (Doutorado em Filosofia), The University of Texas at Austin, 2000. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jens-Erik-Mai/publication/35253559_The_subject_indexing_process_microform_an_investigation_of_problems_in_knowledge_representation/links/0deec51ea5f75e3ed5000000/The-subject-indexing-process-microform-an-investigation-of-problems-in-knowledge-representation.pdf Acesso em: 13 de jul. 2024.
MAI, J. Deconstructing the indexing process. Advances in Librarianship, v. 23, p. 269-298, 1999. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jens-Erik-Mai/publication/235312365_Deconstructing_the_Indexing_Process/links/0deec51ea5f7404e43000000/Deconstructing-the-Indexing-Process.pdf?_sg%5B0%5D=started_experiment_milestone&origin=journalDetail Acesso em 20 de jul. 2024.
MAI, J. Likeness: A pragmatic approach. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, v. 7, p. 23-27, 2000. Disponível em: https://jenserikmai.info/Papers/2000_LikenessAPragmaticApproach.pdf Acesso em 20 de jul. 2024.
MAI, J. Semiotics and indexing: an analysis of the subject indexing process. Journal of documentation, v. 57, n. 5, p. 591-622, 2001. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007095 Acesso em 10 de jul. 2024.
MAI, J. Analysis in indexing: document and domain centered approaches. Information processing & management, v. 41, n. 3, p. 599-611, 2005. Disponível: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2003.12.004 Acesso em 10 de jul. 2024.
MAZZOCCHI, F. Knowledge organization system (KOS): an introductory critical account. Knowledge Organization, v. 45, n. 1, p. 54-78, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-1-54 Acesso em 15 de jun. 2024.
PEIRCE, C. S. The Collected Papers, Hartshorne, C.; Weiss P.; Burks, A. W. (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1931-1958.4a. Edição, 1974. 1-8v.
SARACEVIC, T. Interdisciplinary nature of information science. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v.24, n.1, p.36-41, 1995. Disponível em: https://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/608 Acesso em 10 de jun. 2024.
SILVEIRA, L. F. B da. Três Espécies de Bem. Cognitio, São Paulo, v. 4, n. 1, p. 60-79, 2003. Disponível em: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13240 Acesso em 10 de mai. 2024.
SILVEIRA, L. F. B da. Curso de semiótica geral. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2007.
SILVEIRA, L. F. B da. Informação e Verdade na Filosofia de Peirce. Cognitio, São Paulo, v. 9, n. 2, p. 281-323, 2008. Disponível em: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/13390 Acesso em 10 de mai. 2024.
SMIRAGLIA, R. Epistemology of domain analysis. Cultural frames of knowledge, p. 111-124, 2012.
THELLEFSEN, T. L. Semiotic knowledge organization: theory and method development. Semiotica v.142, p.71-90, 2002. Disponível em: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/semi.2002.086/pdf Acesso em 15 de mai. 2024.
THELLEFSEN, T. L. The fundamental sign. Semiotica, v.149, n.1, p.245-249, 2004. Disponível em: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/semi.2004.028/html. Acesso em 04 de mai. 2024.
THELLEFSEN, T. L. Knowledge profiling: The basis for knowledge organization. Library trends., V. 52,n. 3, p. 507-14, 2004-a. Disponível em: https://core.ac.uk/download/4812056.pdf Acesso em 20 de mai. 2024.
TENNIS, J. T. Subject ontogeny: Subject access through time and the dimensionality of classification. In: LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, M. J. (Ed.). Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st Century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries: Proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference, Granada (Spain), 2002. Würzburg: Ergon, 2002. v.8; p.54-59. Disponível em: https://digital.lib.washington.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/2fc5d742-de2f-4655-9a66-64752606e9a8/content Acesso em 29 de mai. 2024.
TENNIS, J. T. Two axes of domains for domain analysis. Knowledge Organization, v.30, n.3/4, p.191-195, 2003. Disponível em: https://digital.lib.washington.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/e01d4eff-946a-4ab8-99f5-78a0c78e1f8c/content Acesso em 05 de jun. 2024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sonia Cristina Bocardi de Morais, Alexandre Robson Martinês, Valdirene Aparecida Pascoal, Wilson Roberto Veronez Júnior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
As obras deste periódico estão licenciadas com 