PP Relative clauses and intervention effects: comparing unergative and weather verbs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2019v16n1p3499Abstract
The asymmetry between subject and object relative clauses has been attested in processing studies with adults (WANNER; MARATSOS, 1978; WARREN; GIBSON, 2002) and children (UTZERI, 2007; ADANI; SEHM; ZUKOWSKI, 2012). From the perspective of language acquisition, Friedmann, Belletti and Rizzi (2009) have suggested a formal treatment for this asymmetry in terms of intervention, and Costa et al. (2015) have expanded the proposal to PP relatives, considering data from European Portuguese. This study broadens that discussion by means of an elicitation experiment with 4 and 5-year-old children, speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. We contrast PP relatives with unergative verbs, showing intervention, and weather verbs, without intervention. Statistically significant differences between the types of verbs were obtained for younger children. We suggest that processing costs related to the availability of alternative less complex structures in the language is a major factor to be considered. This factor may impact the explanatory power of the intervention hypothesis.
References
ADANI, F.; SEHM, M.; ZUKOWSKI, A. How Do German children and adults deal with their relatives. In: STAVRAKAKI, S.; LALIOTI, M.; KONSTANTINOPOULOU, P. (ed.). Advances in language acquisition. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012. p. 14-22.
AVELAR, J.,; GALVES, C. Tópico e concordância em PB e PE. In: COSTA, A.; BARBOSA, P.; FALÉ, I. (org.) XXVI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística. Textos selecionados. Lisboa: APL, 2011. p. 49-65.
BELLETTI, A.; CONTEMORI, C. Intervention and attraction. on the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. In: COSTA, J.; CASTRO, A.; LOBO, M.; PRATAS, F. (ed.). Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2009. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010. p. 39-52.
CORRÊA, L. M. S. An alternative assessment of children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, v. 24, n. 3, p. 183-203, 1995.
CORRÊA, L. M. S.; AUGUSTO, M. R. A.; MARCILESE, M. Competing analyses and differential cost in the production of non-subject relative clauses. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, v., n.1, p. 1-22, 2018.
COSTA, I. de O. Verbos meteorológicos no plural em orações relativas do português brasileiro: sintaxe e processamento. 2013. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Departamento de Letras, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2013.
COSTA, I. de O.; AUGUSTO, M. R. A.; RODRIGUES, E. dos S. Verbos meteorológicos flexionados no plural e a hipótese da inacusatividade biargumental: explorando a sintaxe do Português Brasileiro. Veredas (UFJF. Online), v. 18, p. 257-280, 2014.
COSTA, J. ; FRIEDMANN, N. ; SILVA, C.; YACHINI, M. The acquisition of PP relatives in Hebrew and European Portuguese: another window into the atoms of intervention. In: HAMANN, C.; RUIGENDIJK, E. (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2013. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015. p.35-48.
de VILLIERS, J.; TAGER-FLUSBERG, H.; HAKUTA, K.; COHEN, M. Children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, v. 8, p. 499-518, 1979.
FRIEDMANN, N.; BELLETTI, A.; RIZZI, L. relativized relatives. types of intervention in the acquisition of A-Bar dependencies. Lingua, v. 119, n.1, p. 67-88, 2009.
GENNARI, S.; MACDONALD, M. E. Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language 58. 161–187, 2008.
GIBSON, E.; DESMET, T.; GRODNER, D.; WATSON, D.; KO, K. reading relative clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, v. 16, n.2, p. 313-353, 2005.
GOODLUCK, H.; TAVAKOLIAN, S. Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses. Cognition, v.11, n.1, p. 1-27, 1982.
GORDON, P. C.; HENDRICK, R.; JOHNSON, M. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, v. 27, n. 6, p. 1411–1423, 2001.
GORDON, P. C.; HENDRICK, R.; JOHNSON, M. Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 51, n.1, p. 97–114, 2004.
GORDON, P. C.; HENDRICK, R.; LEVINE, W. H. Memory-load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, v.13, n. 5, p. 425–430, 2002.
GROLLA, E.; AUGUSTO, M. absolutive constructions in Brazilian Portuguese and Relativized Minimality Effects in Children's Productions. In: Proceedings of GALANA VI - Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 2016. p. 36-47.
GUASTI, M. T.; CARDINALETTI, A. Relative clause formation in romance child production. Probus, v.15, n.1, p. 47-88, 2003.
HAMBURGER, H.; STEPHEN, C. Relative acquisition. In: KUCZAJ, S. (ed.) Language development: syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982. p. 245-274.
LABELLE, Marie. Predication, Wh-Movement and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition, v.1, n.1, p. 95-119, 1990.
MARTINI, K.; BELLETTI, A. ; CONTEMORI, C.; RIZZI, L. On the role of lexical restriction and intervention in production: A new angle on the subject-object relatives asymmetry, Proceedings of the 1st SynCart Workshop "From maps to principles", Special Issue of Generative Grammar in Geneva (GG@G), v. 11, 2018.
MIYAGAWA, S. Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse configurational languages. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 54, MIT Press, 2010.
MUNHOZ, A.; NAVES, R. Construções de tópico-sujeito: uma proposta em termos de estrutura argumental e de transferência de traços de C. SIGNUM: Estudos Linguísticos, Londrina, v. 15, n. 1, p. 245-265, 2012.
O’BRIEN, K.; GROLLA, E.; LILLO-MARTIN, D. Long passives are understood by young children. Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, v. 30, 2005, p. 441 – 451.
PHILLIPS, C.; KAZANINA, N.; ABADA, S. H. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research, v. 22, n. 3, p. 407-428, 2005.
PILATI, E. N. S.; NAVES, R. R. Cisão da categoria pronominal, transferência de traços de C para T e a expressão do sujeito no português brasileiro. In: CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DE LINGUÍSTICA HISTÓRICA, 2., São Paulo, 2012. (Comunicação oral).
RIZZI, L. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1990.
TRAXLER, M. J.; MORRIS, R. K.; SEELY, R. E. Processing subject and object relative clauses: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory & Language, v. 47, n.1, p. 69-90, 2002.
UTZERI, I. The Production and the acquisition of subject and object relative clauses in italian: a comparative experimental study. Nanzan Linguistics, Special Issue 3, v. 1, p. 283-313, 2007.
WANNER, E.; MARATSOS, M.. An ATN approach to comprehension. In: HALLE, M.; BRESNAN, J.; MILLER, G. A. (ed.). Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978. p. 119–161.
WARREN, T.; GIBSON, E. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition, v. 85, p. 79-112, 2002.