The Joint Parliamentary Committee of Enquiry and the Implementation of the Maria da Penha Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/%25xAbstract
This article aims to analyze the findings of the Joint Parliamentary Committee of Enquiry of Violence against Women created by the Brazilian National Congress in 2012 regarding the implementation of the Maria da Penha Law. After a year and a half of work, the report pointed the fragility of public policies to combat violence against women and the obstacles in the implementation of the Maria da Penha Law, among which: ) the fragile network of specialized services to women victims of violence; b) the small number of specialized courts for domestic and family violence against women; c) the failure of the decision of the Supreme Court to prohibit application of the conditional suspension of proceedings d) the resistance of jurists to understand the proposed new law and break with the family perspective; e) the insufficient budget for the development and maintenance of public policies to combat violence against women. The report concludes that the Brazilian states invest very little in specific public policy and that the full implementation of the Maria da Penha Law depends on a new legal understanding of the relationship between government and a budget policy of gender.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Revista Estudos Feministas is under the Creative Commons International 4.0 Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), that allows sharing the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The license allows:
Sharing (copying and redistributing the material in any support or format) and/or adapting (remixing, transforming, and creating from the material) for any purpose, even if commercial.
The licensor cannot revoke these rights provided the terms of the license are respected. The terms are the following:
Attribution – you should give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made. This can be done in several ways without suggesting that the licensor has approved of the use.
Without additional restrictions – You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that prevent others from doing something allowed by the license.


