Intersectionality and algorithmic discrimination

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2026.e115125

Keywords:

discrimination, algorithm, intersectionality, differentiation, fundamental rights

Abstract

This article analyzes how identity-based discrimination and social exclusion processes are reconfigured by algorithmic social differentiation, proposing a framework that links social systems theory with intersectionality as a critical and normative basis for legal responses. The increasing use of algorithms reproduces and amplifies historical inequalities, while the unidimensional categories of anti-discrimination law prove insufficient to capture the complexity of digital exclusion across multiple, interconnected social markers. A qualitative approach involving theoretical-conceptual reconstruction was employed, integrating social systems theory with the analytical perspective of intersectionality. The study demonstrates that algorithmic differentiation recombines classic forms of social differentiation through psychographic profiling, ranking, and the predictive control of communication flows. Algorithmic discrimination is systemic and polycontextual in nature, functioning as an automated reproduction of historical asymmetries rather than a mere technical glitch. The article concludes that addressing this exclusion requires moving beyond simplified views of equality and calls for multidimensional mechanisms—such as explainable transparency, independent auditability, meaningful human review, enhanced evidentiary standards, and democratic participation in technological governance.

Author Biography

Mateus de Oliveira Fornasier, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI

Professor and Researcher in the Stricto Sensu Graduate Program (Master's and Doctorate) in Law at the Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI). PhD in Law from the Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), with a postdoctoral fellowship in Law and Theory from the University of Westminster (United Kingdom).

References

ALBA, Joel Tyler. Insights into Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems via a Decolonial-Intersectional Lens: A Cross-Analysis Case Study. Digital Society, v. 3, n. 58, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00144-9.

ALESSI, Nicolò Paolo. Intersectionality as a legal concept? Applications and implications of the notion (within and) beyond non-discrimination law. BioLaw Journal - Rivista di biodiritto, v. 1, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-3503

ANDERSON, Gavin W. Societal Constitutionalism, Social Movements, and Constitutionalism from Below. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, v. 20, n. 2, p. 881-906, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.20.2.881

BACHUR, João Paulo. A Performatividade da Exclusão e as Lutas por Inclusão: Questões Distributivas a Partir da Teoria de Sistemas Sociais. Sociologia & Antropologia, v. 10, n. 1, jan./abr. 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752019v1014

BAECKER, Dirk. Distinguishing next society. Current Sociology, v. 73, n. 4, p. 493–508, 2025.

BRASIL. Decreto n. 10.932, de 10 de janeiro de 2022. Promulga a Convenção Interamericana contra o Racismo, a Discriminação Racial e Formas Correlatas de Intolerância.

BRASIL. Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Resolução n. 492, de 17 de março de 2023. Institui o Protocolo para Julgamento com Perspectiva de Gênero.

BUOLAMWINI, Joy; GEBRU, Timnit. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification In: CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY, 1., 2018, New York. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, New York: PMLR, v. 81, p. 77-91, 2018. Disponível em: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/. Acesso em 09 ago 2026.

COLLINS, Patricia Hill; BILGE, Sirma. Interseccionalidade. Trad. Rane Souza. 1. ed. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2020.

CRENSHAW, Kimberlé. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, Chicago, v. 1989, n. 1, p. 139–167, 1989. Disponível em: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2025.

CRENSHAW, Kimberlé Williams. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. In: CRENSHAW, Kimberlé; GOTANDA, Neil; PELLER, Gary; THOMAS, Kendall (Ed.). Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement. New York: The New Press, 1995. p. 357–383.

ESPOSITO, Elena. Artificial Communication: How Algorithms Produce Social Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2022.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. District Court, E. D. Missouri, Eastern Division. DeGraffenreid v. General Motors Assembly Div., St. Louis. 413 F. Supp. 142. 1976. Disponível em: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/413/142/1660699/. Acesso em: 02 ago 2026.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. [Civil Rights Act of 1964]. Pub. L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964. Disponível em: https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/civil-rights-act. Acesso em: 02 ago 2026.

FERREIRA, Luisa Teresa Hedler. Algorithms, Efficiency and the Two Faces of Courts: A Case Study of the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (STJ). Soziale Systeme, v. 26, n. 1-2, p. 370-395, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2021-0014

FROSIO, Giancarlo; GEIGER, Christope. Taking fundamental rights seriously in the Digital Services Act's platform liability regime. *European Law Journal*, v. 29, n. 1-2, p. 31-77, 2023. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12475

GERARDS, J. H.; XENIDIS, R. Algorithmic Discrimination in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities for Gender Equality and Non-Discrimination Law. LuxemburgO: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021.

GOMES, Amanda Maria de Sobral. Sexismo e racismo algorítmico: um olhar interseccional sobre o neomaterialismo através do Midjourney. Revista da UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, v. 30, 2023. DOI: 10.35699/2965-6931.2023.47587.

JOSEPH, Sania; ANANTHARAMAN, Vijay. Algorithmic bias and human rights: exploring the intersection and implications. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, v. 7, n. 1, 2024. Disponível em: https://ijlmh.com/wp-content/uploads/Algorithmic-Bias-and-Human-Rights.pdf. Acesso em 02 ago 2026.

JUNQUEIRA, Antonio Helio; BOTELHO-FRANCISCO, Rodrigo. Raça: dimensão interseccional das vulnerabilidades digitais. Contemporânea, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 3, p. 63-78, 2022. DOI: 10.9771/contemporanea.v19i3.45899.

LEWIS, J. David; WEIGERT, Andrew. Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, Oxford, v. 63, n. 4, p. 967-985, 1985.

LUHMANN, Niklas. Ecological Communication. Tradução de John Bednarz Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.

LUHMANN, Niklas. Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.

LUHMANN, Niklas. La sociedad de la sociedad. México: Herder/Universidad Iberoamericana, 2006.

LUHMANN, Niklas. Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy. Trad. Jeremy Gaines e Doris L. Jones. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1986.

LUHMANN, Niklas. Organización y Decisión. México: Universidad Iberoamericana, 2000.

LUHMANN, Niklas. Sistemas Sociales: lineamientos para una teoría general. Barcelona: Anthropos; México: Universidad Iberoamericana, 1998.

LUHMANN, Niklas. Trust and power. Chichester: Wiley, 1979.

MATURBONGS, Yoseph Hendrik. Artificial Intelligence and the Fragile Fortress: Addressing the Security and Data Privacy Gaps in Indonesia’s Financial Sector Resilience. The International Journal of Financial Systems, v. 3, n. 2, p. 129–158, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61459/ijfs.v3i2.89

MCCALL, Leslie. Complex Inequality: gender, class, and race in the new economy. New York; London: Routledge, 2001.

MONTEIRO, Pedro Diogo Carvalho. Reconhecendo faces, enclausurando corpos: terror racial, vigilância racializadora e o uso policial do reconhecimento facial na Bahia. 2022. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito) – Faculdade de Direito, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, 2022.

MOREIRA, Adilson José; ALMEIDA, Philippe Oliveira de; CORBO, Wallace. Manual de educação jurídica antirracista: direito, justiça e transformação social. São Paulo: Editora Contracorrente, 2022.

MOREIRA, Adilson José. O que é discriminação? 2 ed. Belo Horizonte: Letramento; Justificando, 2017.

NUNES, Pablo; LIMA, Thallita; CRUZ, Thais. O sertão vai virar mar: expansão do reconhecimento facial na Bahia [livro eletrônico]. Rio de Janeiro: CESeC, 2023. Disponível em: https://cesecseguranca.com.br/livro/o-sertao-vai-virar-mar-expansao-do-reconhecimento-facial-na-bahia/. Acesso em: 9 ago. 2026.

RAMOS, Wanessa Assunção; TEIDER, Lucas Hinckel. As mulheres negras e o enviesamento da tecnologia. Cadernos de Gênero e Tecnologia, Curitiba, v. 15, n. 45, p. 252-266, jan./jul. 2022.

ROTH, Stephan. Digital transformation of management and organization theories: a research programme. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, v. 40, p. 451-459, 2023.

SALES, Augusto; CARVALHO, Juliana. Pardo is the new black: reframing racial identity in Brazil and beyond — a systems perspective. Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31083/MRev39591

SANTOS, Rodrigo Coimbra; GRAMINHO, Vivian Maria Caxambu. Discriminação algorítmica nas relações de trabalho e princípios da Lei Geral De Proteção De Dados. Seqüência, Florianópolis, v. 45, n. 96, p. 1–31, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2024.e96294

SCHWARTZ, Germano. Algonormative expectations. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, v. 14, n. 5, p. 1337-1358, 2024. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1864

SIKIMIC, Vlasta et al. Do Political Attitudes Matter for Epistemic Decisions of Scientists?. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, v. 12, p. 775-801, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-020-00504-7.

SOUZA, L. C., SILVA, R. P., & LACERDA, C. L. Discriminação algorítmica racial e direitos humanos no uso de inteligência artificial: impactos do PL 2.338/2023. Libertas, v. 14, n. 1, 2024. Recuperado de https://periodicos.famig.edu.br/index.php/libertas/article/view/489

TAEKKE, Jesper. Algorithmic Differentiation of Society – a Luhmann Perspective on the Societal Impact of Digital Media. Journal of Sociocybernetics, v. 18, n. 1, p. 2-23, 2022. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_jos/jos.202216225

TAEKKE, Jesper. Digital Media as Technology and Interactivity: From Explicit Social Selection to Implicit Algorithmic Governance. Media, Communication & Society, 2025. Disponível em: https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/digital-media-as-technology-and-interactivity-from-explicit-socia/. Acesso em 30 dez 2025.

TEUBNER, Gunther. Fragmentos constitucionais: constitucionalismo social na globalização. Coordenação de Ricardo Campos. 2. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva Educação, 2020.

TOSINI, Domenico. Social immunology: A theory of the immune processes of social systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, v. 38, n. 3, p. 336-349, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2664

ULNICANE, Inga. Intersectionality in Artificial Intelligence: Framing Concerns and Recommendations for Action. Social Inclusion, v. 12, n. 2, p. 1-20, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v12.7543

XU, Gezheng; CHEN, Qi; LING, Charles X.; WANG, Boyu; SHUI, Changjian. Intersectional unfairness discovery. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2024). Vienna: PMLR, 2024. p. 54888-54917. Disponível em: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/xu24d.html. Acesso em 02 ago 2026.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-09

How to Cite

FORNASIER, Mateus de Oliveira. Intersectionality and algorithmic discrimination. Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies, Florianópolis, v. 47, n. 102, p. 1–35, 2026. DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2026.e115125. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/115125. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2026.