<b> Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law</b> <br> doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319

Authors

  • Argemiro Cardoso Moreira Martins Universidade de Brasília
  • Larissa Mizutani Universidade de Brasília

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319

Abstract

The category of minority is used as argumentative reinforcement in Law for the defense of fundamental rights. It is destined to groups that were historically marginalized, and claim for public recognition of their peculiarities and the protection of rights. This category, which appeared linked to the idea of state sovereignty and nationality, now is extended to demands ignored before. The interpretation of principles related to the minority category must therefore be conceived as a need for consolidation of constitutional democratic values. This study aims to identify how the minority category is articulated in decisions of the judiciary. The source of precedents on which research is developed are those decisions of all instances of the Brazilian courts, tried and published since October 5, 1988 until July 31, 2010. The conclusion is that the use of minority category by the judges pursues the democratic ideal of law enforcement to those belonging to minority groups.

Author Biographies

Argemiro Cardoso Moreira Martins, Universidade de Brasília

Possui graduação em Direito pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (1993),mestrado em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (1996) e doutorado emDireito pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (2004). Atualmente é professor adjuntode direito público na Universidade de Brasília (UnB).

Larissa Mizutani, Universidade de Brasília

Mestranda em Direito na Universidade de Brasília. Bolsista da CAPES.

Published

2011-12-24

How to Cite

MARTINS, Argemiro Cardoso Moreira; MIZUTANI, Larissa. <b> Minority Rights Interpreted: The democratic commitment of Brazilian Law</b> <br> doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319. Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies, Florianópolis, v. 32, n. 63, p. 319–352, 2011. DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319. Acesso em: 19 oct. 2024.

Issue

Section

Artigos