Iniciativas de escrita latino-americanas em engenharia em países de língua espanhola


  • Elizabeth Narváez-Cardona Universidad Autónoma de Occidente



 Este artigo analisa publicações latino-americanas a partir de países que falam Espanhol para mapear programas realizados na Região e, em seguida, fornecer um contexto para vislumbrar novas agendas de pesquisa para estudos de escrita latino-americanos em engenharia. A análise de 22 publicações sugere que as iniciativas e estudos em engenharia são recentes (a partir de 2009). A amostra revela uma ênfase em publicações orientadas pedagogicamente com foco em engenharia como um campo. As tendências sugerem que os defensores latino-americanos da escrita em engenharia podem se beneficiar através da incorporação de referenciais teóricos para a) explorar e compreender diferentes papéis da escrita através do tempo e do currículo na aprendizagem dos alunos e por subcampos de engenharia e, b) explorar abordagens teóricas para entender gêneros além de textos individuais (ou seja, repertórios de gênero e sistemas de gênero).

Biografia do Autor

Elizabeth Narváez-Cardona, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente

Elizabeth Narváez-Cardona is a Professor at the Languages Department at Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, in Colombia. She is currently pursuing her PhD in Education at UCSB. She is interested in academic writing, and in understanding the scholastic differences between the United States and Latin America in terms of public educational policies, institutional identities, historical accounts, and local resources. 



Adler-Kassner, L. (2014). Liberal Learning, Professional Training, and Disciplinarity in the Age of Educational ‘Reform’": Remodeling General Education." College English, 76(5), 436.

Allen, J. (2010). Mapping institutional values and the technical communication curriculum: A strategy for grounding assessment. In Hundleby, M. N., & Allen, J. (Eds.). Assessment in technical and professional communication. (pp. 39-56). Baywood Publishing Company.

Artemeva, N. (2005). A Time to Speak, a Time to Act A Rhetorical Genre Analysis of a Novice Engineer’s Calculated Risk Taking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 389-421.

Base internacional bibliográfica sobre Lectura y Escritura - Inicio. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2015, from:

Bernhardt, S. A. (2002). Active-practice: Creating productive tension between academia and industry. In Mirel, B., & Spilka, R. (Eds.). Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century. (pp. 81-90). Routledge

Boettger, R. K., & Lam, C. H. R. I. S. (2013). An Overview of Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Technical Communication Journals (1992–2011). Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 56(4), 272-293.

Carter, M., Ferzli, M., & Wiebe, E. N. (2007). Writing to learn by learning to write in the disciplines. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(3), 278-302.

Elliot, N. & Coppola, N. (2010). Assessment of graduate programs in technical communication. In Hundleby, M. N., & Allen, J. (Eds.). Assessment in technical and professional communication. (pp. 127-161). Baywood Publishing Company.

Ford, J. D., & Newmark, J. (2011). Emphasizing Research (Further) in Undergraduate Technical Communication Curricula: Involving Undergraduate Students with an Academic Journal's Publication and Management. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 41(3), 311-324.

ILEES English. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2015, from

Lerner, N. (2009). The idea of a writing laboratory. SIU Press.

Maylath, B., Grabill, J., & Gurak, L. J. (2010). Intellectual fit and programmatic power: Organizational profiles of four professional/technical/scientific communication programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 262-280.

McDaniel, R., & Steward, S. (2011). Technical communication pedagogy and the broadband divide: Academic and industrial perspectives. Complex worlds: Digital culture, rhetoric, and professional communication, (pp. 195-212). NY: Baywood.

Miller, C. R. (2004). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. Central works in technical communication, 47-54. Oxford University Press.

Monberg, J. (2002). Science and technology studies as a research method. In Gurak, L. J., & Lay, M. M. (Eds.). (2002). Research in technical communication. (pp. 211-229).Greenwood Publishing Group.

Moore. L. J. (forthcoming). Five Essential Principles about Writing Transfer. In Critical Transitions: Writing and the Question of Transfer, ed. Jessie Moore and Chris M. Anson. Parlor Press. Forthcoming 2016.

Poe, M., Lerner, N., & Craig, J. (2010). Learning to communicate in science and engineering: Case studies from MIT. MIT Press.

Quick, C. (2012). From the Workplace to Academia: Nontraditional Students and the Relevance of Workplace Experience in Technical Writing Pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 230-250.

Reave, L. (2004). Technical Communication Instruction in Engineering Schools A Survey of Top-Ranked US and Canadian Programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(4), 452-490.

Rounsaville, A. (2012). Selecting Genres for Transfer: The Role of Uptake in Students' Antecedent Genre Knowledge. In Composition Forum (Vol. 26). Association of Teachers of Advanced Composition.

Rude, C. D. (2009). Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication.

Russell, D. R. (2007). Rethinking the Articulation Between Business and Technical Communication and Writing in the Disciplines Useful Avenues for Teaching and Research. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(3), 248-277.

Selber, S. (2004). Challenges facing technical communication teachers in the computer age. In Selber, S. A. Central works in technical communication. (pp. 449-466). Oxford University Press.

Selfe, R. & Selfe, C. (2012). What Are the Boundaries, Artifacts, and Identities of Technical Communication?. In Johnson-Eilola, J., & Selber, S. A. (Eds.). Solving problems in technical communication. (pp. 19-50). University of Chicago Press.

Spilka, R. (2002). Becoming a profession. In Mirel, B., & Spilka, R. (Eds.). Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century. (pp. 97-111). Routledge.

Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working Alone Together Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication,26(4), 399-441.

Tatzl, D., Hassler, W., Messnarz, B., & Flühr, H. (2012). The Development of a Project-Based Collaborative Technical Writing Model Founded on Learner Feedback in a Tertiary Aeronautical Engineering Program. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(3), 279-304.

Thralls, C., & Blyler, N. (2002). Cultural studies: An orientation for research in professional communication. In Gurak, L. J., & Lay, M. M. (Eds.). Research in technical communication. (pp. 185-209). Greenwood Publishing Group.

Tuomi-Gröhn, T. & Engeström, Y. (2003). Conceptualizing transfer from standard notions to developmental perspectives. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.) Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary crossing. (pp. 19-39). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

Winsor, D. A. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Routledge.

Yeats, D., & Thompson, I. (2010). Mapping technical and professional communication: A summary and survey of academic locations for programs. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 225-261.