Políticas espaciais em Rosencrantz e Guildenstern Estão Mortos, de Tom Stoppard

Autores

  • Elham Kazemi Universidade Kharazmi
  • Mohsen Hanif Kharazmi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2017v70n1p287

Resumo

Este artigo examina a noção de política espacial em Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, de Tom Stoppard. Os dois cortesãos entram no mundo politicamente convulsivo de Hamlet, onde nenhuma estrutura de poder legítimo toma conta do estado. Sua racionalidade política regularizada deixa de ser aplicável ao mundo; a realidade viola o conhecimento empírico -  direções geográficas e espirituais, e, geralmente, identidade - de Rosencrantz e Guildenstern. As funções previamente definidas de lugares, ou heterotopias (em termos de Foucault), estão em um estado de suspensão. Portanto, eles estão perdidos no meio dos conjuntos desconhecidos de relações espaciais; qualquer tipo de ato intencional escapa-lhes; morrem e desaparecem absurdamente em um lugar sem lugar.

Biografia do Autor

Elham Kazemi, Universidade Kharazmi

Elham Kazemi has an MA in English Literature from Kharazmi University of Tehran,  Iran. Her current research focuses on postmodernism and modern drama.

Mohsen Hanif, Kharazmi


Assistant professor of English Literature at University of Kharazmi, Iran. He has published articles on Persian and comparative literature, as well as American ethnic minorites' fiction. He also has published a book in Persian on War Fiction and has a another under publication about magical realism in Iran.

Referências

Bloom, Harold, ed. Comprehensive Research and Study Guide: Bloom's Major Dramatists: Tom Stoppard. Chelsea House Publishers, 2003.

De Lange, Attie. "The Matrix And the Echo: Intertexual Remodeling in Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Literator (1991): 69-84.

Draudt, Manfred. "Two Sides of the Same Coin or ...the Same Side of the Two Coins: An Analysis of Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." English Studies (2008): 348-357.

Duncan, Joseph E. "Godot Comes: Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Ariel (1981): 57-70.

Easterling, Anja. "Shakespearean Parallels and Affinities with the Theatre of Absurd in Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Doctoral Dissertation. Umea University, 1982.

Fei, Liang. "Metadrama and Themes in Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Canadian Social Science (2007): 99-105.

Fejervari, Boldizsar. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Meet Edward II: A Study in Intertexuality." The Anachronist (2003): 174-198.

Foucault, Michel. "From The History of Sexuality, Volume 1, An Introduction." The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B., et al. Leitch. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc., 2001. 1502-1521.

—. "Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias." Architecture /Mouvement/ Continuité (1984): 1-9.

Foucault, Michel. "The Eye of Power." Power/ Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Ed. Colin Gordon. Trans. Leo Marshal, Kate Soper, John Mepham Colin Gordon. New York: The Harvester Press, 1980. 146-155.

Gross, Ben. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead: A Study of Theatrical Determinism." Gnovis (2014): 1-7.

Hooti, Noorbakhsh. "A Postmodernist Reading of Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Studies in Literature and Language (2011): 147-162.

Jernigan, Daniel. "Tom Stoppard as Trickster in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Bloom's Literary Themes: The Trickster. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Infobase Publishing, 2010. 159-168.

King, Kelly. "An Analysis of Narrative Identity in Hamlet and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Senior Undergraduate Thesis. UKnowledge, 2013.

Maji, Pew. "Absurdism in Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." Galaxy (2013): 1-5.

Mayer, Elizabeth A. "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead: A Postmodern Analysis." A Thesis . New York, 1991.

Rabinow, Paul. "Introduction." Foucault Reader. Ed. Paul Rabinow. New York: Pantheon Books, 1984. 3-30.

Rawlley, Amita. "A Comparative Study of Shakespeare's Hamlet and Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." RJELAL (2015): 207-212.

Rung, Adam. "Time Out of Joint--As Usual Reading Rosencrantz an Guildenstern Are Dead as a Saturnalian Play." Graeco-Latina Brunensia (2015): 103-119.

Shooshtarian, Samaneh. "On Delogocentrism: A Deconstructionist Reading of Tom Stoppard's Two Selected Plays; Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Arcadia." International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World(2013): 51-69.

Stoppard, Tom. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Ed. Henry Popkin. New York: Grove Press, 1967.

Suwalska-Kolecka, Anna. "A Sense of Epistomological Vertigo in Tom Stoppard's Spatial constructions." Exploring Space: Spatial Notions in Cultural, Literary and Language studies. Ed. Andrzej. Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna Ciuk. Vol. I: Space in Cultural and Literary Studies. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010. 309-323.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-01-27

Edição

v. 70 n. 1 (2017)

Seção

Artigos

Licença

A revista Ilha do Desterro publica artigos e resenhas inéditos, referentes as áreas de Inglês, Literaturas em Língua Inglesa e Estudos Culturais. Publica volumes mistos e/ou temáticos, com artigos e resenhas em inglês e português. 

Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.


Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.