Critical tasks in action: the role of the teacher in the implementation of tasks designed from a critical perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2020v73n1p109Abstract
Based on the premise that teaching is a political act and that it is thus necessary to engage additional language students in the process of both linguistic and critical development (Crookes, 2013), this study aims at investigating the role of the teacher during the implementation of a cycle of tasks designed from the perspectives of the Task-based Approach (Ellis, 2003) and of Critical Pedagogy (Freire, 1996). According to Breen (2009), a task can be understood as a workplan which is modified and reinterpreted during its implementation. Samuda (2009) argues that one of the central roles of the teacher in task-based language teaching is to guide students in language processing so as to cater for linguistic development. In this sense, it is important to investigate the task as a process, that is, the strategies adopted by the teacher while implementing the task as a workplan. In order to do so, this study focuses on the reflexive diaries of the teacher-researcher, in which he describes and reflects upon the implementation of a critical cycle of tasks designed for a group of high school students in a Brazilian context. From the thematic analysis of the diaries, the theme ‘strategies’ could be identified, which demonstrates decisions that were taken by the teacher-researcher during implementation so as to: a) guarantee that the critical objective of the task would be met, b) guide the students’ attention to a specific topic (such as focus on form or the critical topic at hand), c) overcome technical and material difficulties and d) facilitate students’ learning process. The complexity involved in the implementation process of tasks designed from a critical perspective suggests the need for teachers to develop their critical reflexive skills in order to be able to make decisions that will be adequate for each specific educational context.References
Bernstein, K. A., Hellmich, E. A., Katznelson N., Shin, J., & Vinall K. (2015). Introduction to Special Issue: Critical perspectives on neoliberalism in second/foreign language education. L2 Journal, 7(3), 3-14.
Brasil. (1998a). Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais. Brasília/DF: MEC/SEF.
Brasil. (1998b). Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: 3o e 4o ciclos do Ensino Fundamental: Língua Estrangeira. Brasília/DF: MEC/SEF.
Brasil. (2006). Orientações Curriculares para o Ensino Médio: Linguagens, códigos e suas tecnologias. Brasília/DF: MEC/Secretaria de Educação Básica.
Breen, M. P. (2009). Learner contributions to task design. In K. V. d. Brander, M. Bygate & J. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 333-356). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Buckingham, D., & Sefton-Green, J. (1991). Cultural studies goes to school. London: Taylor & Francis.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics (pp. 1-47). Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education. Mimeo.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
Crookes, G. V. (2010). Radical language teaching. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), A handbook of second and foreign language teaching (pp. 595-609). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
Crookes, G. V. (2013). Critical ELT in action: Foundations, promises, praxis. New York: Routledge.
Crookes, G. V., & Lehner, A. (1998). Aspects of process in an ESL critical pedagogy teacher education course. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 319-328.
Da Silva, M. (2003). Constructing the teaching process from inside out: how pre-service teachers make sense of the perceptions of the teaching of the four skills. Masters Thesis in Letras Inglês e Literatura Correspondente – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Inglês, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.
Davis, K. A. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 427-453.
Dewey, J. (1950). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogia da autonomia. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2007). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175-199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hall, S. (1992). Cultural Studies and its theoretical legacies. In L. Grossberg & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 277-294). New York: Routledge.
Leffa, V. J. (1988) Metodologia do ensino de línguas. In H. I. Bohn & P. Vandresen (Orgs.), Tópicos em linguística aplicada: O ensino de línguas estrangeiras (pp. 211-236). Florianópolis: Ed. da UFSC.
Long, M. H. (1997). Focus on Form in Task-Based Language Teaching. www.mhhe.com. McGraw-Hill Companies: USA.
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Long, M. H. (2016). In defense of tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and real issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 5-33. doi:10.1017/S0267190515000057
Moita Lopes, L. P. (1996). Oficina de linguística aplicada (5 Ed.). Campinas: Mercado de Letras.
Pacheco, E. (2011). Institutos Federais: Uma revolução na educação profissional e tecnológica. Brasília: SETEC/MEC.
Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and Memory during SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long, (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 631-678). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Samuda, V. (2009). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance. In K. V. d. Brander, M. Bygate & J. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 379-400). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Samuda, V. (2015). Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp. 271-301). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Schlatter, M., & Garcez, P. M. (2009). Línguas adicionais (espanhol e inglês). In Rio Grande do Sul, Secretaria de Estado da Educação, Departamento Pedagógico. (Orgs.), Referências curriculares do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul: Linguagem, códigos e suas tecnologias (Vol. 1, pp. 127-172). Porto Alegre: Secretaria de Estado da Educação, Departamento Pedagógico.
Silva, L. (2018). Teaching English for Critical Language Development: Investigating the implementation of a critical cycle of tasks in the context of basic and technological education (Unpublished Dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Skehan, P. (2009). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. In K. V. d. Branden, M. Bygate & J. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 83-107). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Urzêda-Freitas, M. T. (2012). Educando para transgredir: Reflexões sobre o ensino crítico de línguas estrangeiras/inglês. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, 51(1), 77-97. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-18132012000100005.
Van den Branden, K. (2009). Mediating between predetermined order and complete chaos. The role of the teacher in task-based language education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 264–285.
Yukhymenko, M. A., Brown, S. W., Lawless, K. A., Brodowinska, K., & Mullin, G. (2014). Thematic analysis of teacher instructional practices and student responses in middle school classrooms with problem-based learning environment. Global Education Review, 1(3), 93-109.
