Analysis of the accessibility of virtual museums for blind visitors: a case study in alagoas, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2026.e109420Keywords:
Accessibility, Virtual Museum, Visually Impaired People, Blind People, WCAG GuidelinesAbstract
Objective: To analyze the accessibility of virtual museums for blind visitors in the state of Alagoas (a federative unit of Brazil).
Methods: This applied exploratory study began with a narrative literature review to establish the conceptual background and identify accessibility needs of people with visual impairments in virtual museums. Interviews with seven blind participants collected qualitative data on web navigation experiences. Virtual museums related to the state of Alagoas were evaluated using WCAG-based automated tools, and one was selected as a case study to implement accessibility improvements. An experiment with ten blind participants validated the adapted museum.
Results: Seven virtual museums related to Alagoas were identified. The analysis revealed that on a scale of 0 to 10, the accessibility of most virtual museums is below 6.0, with an overall average of 5.4. In the selected case study, corrections increased the average accessibility score from 7.1 to 9.97. Validation with ten blind participants confirmed the museum’s accessibility.
Conclusions: Since the accessibility conditions of real museums are critical, virtual museums are an alternative for disabled people to access culture and leisure. Therefore, we proposed a method to evaluate the accessibility of virtual museums for visually impaired visitors.
Downloads
References
AAM. Alagoas Architecture Museum (Portal de Arquitetura Alagoana). 2026. Available on: http://arquiteturaalagoana.al.org.br. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
ALAJARMEH, N. Evaluating the accessibility of public health websites: An exploratory cross-country study. Universal Access in the Information Society, v. 21, n. 3, p. 771-789, ago. 2022. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00788-7. Accessed on 1 Mar. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00788-7
AL-RAZGAN, M. et al. A systematic literature review on the usability of mobile applications for visually impaired users. PeerJ Computer Science, v. 7, e771, nov. 2021. Available on: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.771. Accessed on 22 Feb. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.771
APPLE. Accessibility – Apple Developer Documentation. 2026. Available on: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/accessibility. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
ARTE. AccessMonitor – A tool of the ecosystem from accessibility.gov.pt. 2026. Available on: https://accessmonitor.acessibilidade.gov.pt/. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
AUDIOEYE. AudioEye – Web Accessibility Platform for Businesses of All Sizes. 2025. Available on: https://www.audioeye.com/. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
BRASIL. Decreto nº 6.949, de 25 de agosto de 2009. Promulga a Convenção Internacional sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência e seu Protocolo Facultativo, assinados em Nova York, em 30 de março de 2007. Available on: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2009/decreto/d6949.htm. Accessed on 10 Feb. 2026.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015. Institui a Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência (Estatuto da Pessoa com Deficiência). Available on: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13146.htm. Accessed on 1 Mar. 2026.
CHADLI, F.; DRISS, G.; MOUMEN, A. Digital accessibility: a systematic literature review. SHS Web of Conferences, v. 119, art. 06005, p. 1-13, 2021. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111906005. Accessed on 28 Feb. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111906005
CHICO. São Francisco River Museum (Casa do velho chico). 2026. Available on: http://casadovelhochico.com.br/. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
DAMACENO, R.; BRAGA, J.; MENA-CHALCO, J. Mobile device accessibility for the visually impaired: problems mapping and recommendations. Universal Access in the Information Society, v. 17, p. 421-435, jun. 2018. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0540-1. Accessed on 28 Feb. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0540-1
DATTA, P.; SABIR, F. Influence of the family on students with visual impairment. In: BAIKADY, R. et al. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. p. 1-13. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_69-1. Accessed on 13 Nov. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_69-1
SOUSA E SILVA, J.; PEREIRA, A.; GONÇALVES, R.; GOMES, S. State of the art of accessible development for smart devices: from a disable and not impaired point of view. In: 9th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2014, Barcelona. Anais [...]. p. 1-5. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1109/CISTI.2014.6876937. Accessed on 28 Feb. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CISTI.2014.6876937
DEFENDI, E. L. Assistive technologies and employability of visually impaired person. Benjamin Constant, ano 22, edição especial, p. 87-96, 2016. I Simpósio Nacional de Tecnologia Assistiva do Instituto Benjamin Constant. Available on: https://revista.ibc.gov.br/index.php/BC/article/view/342. Accessed on 28 Feb. 2026.
FERREIRA, G.; CIANCONI, R. Accessibility at sites of university libraries by the visually impaired and blind people. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, v. 21, n. 2, p. 151-163, 2011. Available on: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/ies/article/view/10248. Accessed on 13 Nov. 2025.
GAGGI, O.; PERINELLO, L. Improving accessibility of web accessibility rules. In: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (GoodIT '22), p. 167-174, 2022. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1145/3524458.3547267. Accessed on 13 Nov. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3524458.3547267
GRIFFITH, M.; WENTZ, B.; LAZAR, J. Quantifying the cost of web accessibility barriers for blind users. Interacting with Computers, v. 34, n. 6, p. 137-149, feb. 2023. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwad004. Accessed on 13 Nov. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwad004
HARPER, S.; YESILADA, Y. Web accessibility: a foundation for research. 2. ed. Cham: Springer, 2019. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7440-0
IBRAM. MuseusBr – Cadastro Nacional de Museus. 2026. Available on: https://cadastro.museus.gov.br/. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
KARANDASH. Karandash Gallery (Coleção Karandash de Arte Popular e Contemporânea). 2026. Available on: https://karandash.com.br/pt/Museu. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
M3. Accessibility overview – Material Design 3. 2025. Available on: https://m3.material.io/foundations/overview/principles. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
MIKA, P.; BAEZA-YATES, R. The impact of the Web on information retrieval. In: SENEVIRATNE, O; HENDLER, J. (eds.). Linking the World’s Information: Essays on Tim Berners-Lee’s Invention of the World Wide Web. Association for Computing Machinery, 2023. p. 105-114. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1145/3591366.3591377. Accessed on 13 Nov. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3591366.3591377
MILLER, A. Disabilities and User Experience: An exploratory case study of survey and website accessibility. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, v. 14, n. 2, p. 35-58, nov. 2024. Available on: https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v14i2.513. Accessed on 13 Nov. 2025.
MPU. Alagoas Public Prosecutor's Office Memorial (Memorial Desembargador Hélio Cabral do Ministério Público de Alagoas). 2026. Available on: https://www.mpal.mp.br/?page_id=1798. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
PROEX UFAL. UFAL Pinacotheca (Pinacoteca - Museu de Arte Contemporânea da Ufal). 2026. Available on: https://pinacoteca.ufal.br/. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
ROJAS, H. et al. Application of accessibility guidelines in a virtual museum. In: 3rd International Conference of Inclusive Technology and Education (CONTIE), 2020, La Paz. Anais [...]. p. 73-79. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTIE51334.2020.00022. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTIE51334.2020.00022
SCHWEIBENZ, W. The “Virtual Museum”: new perspectives for museums to present objects and information using the Internet as a knowledge base and communication system. Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft, n. 34, p. 185-200, 1998. Available on: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4136806. Accessed on 13 Nov. 2025.
SECULT. Republic Memorial of Alagoas (O Memorial à República). 2026. Available on: https://secult.al.gov.br/equipamentos/memorial-a-republica. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
SHARIF, A.; CHINTALAPATI, S.; WOBBROCK, J.; REINECKE, K. Understanding screen-reader users’ experiences with online data visualizations. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '21), 2021. p. 1-16. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471202. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471202
TROTTA, R. Vatican Museums' accessibility practices for blind and partially sighted (BPS) visitors: A case study. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, v. 13, n. 2, p. 113-139, nov. 2023. Available on: https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v13i2.405. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
UFAL. UFAL Science Show Museum (Usina Ciência – Multimídia). 2026. Available on: https://usinaciencia.ufal.br/multimidia. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
UMBELINO, C. C.; ÁVILA, M. P. As condições de saúde ocular no Brasil 2023. 1. ed. São Paulo: Conselho Brasileiro de Oftalmologia, 2023. Available on: https://www.cbo.net.br/admin/docs_upload/050515Publicacao_condicoes_saude_ocular_brasil_2023_cbo_atualizacao_2023.pdf. Accessed on 15 Feb. 2026.
VERASZTO, E.; CAMARGO, J.; SILVA, E.; CAMARGO, E. Blindness and science conceptualization: the perception of basic education teachers and students. ETD – Educação Temática Digital, v. 21, n. 2, p. 435-458, abr. 2019. Available on: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/etd/article/view/8650633/19361. Accessed on 13 Nov. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/etd.v21i2.8650633
W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. 2024. Available on: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/. Accessed on 15 Feb. 2026.
W3C BRASIL. Cartilha de acessibilidade na web: W3C Brasil. Fascículo I: Introdução. 2013. Available on: https://ceweb.br/media/docs/publicacoes/1/cartilha-w3cbr-acessibilidade-web-fasciculo-I.pdf. Accessed on 1 Mar. 2026.
W3C BRASIL. Cartilha de acessibilidade na web. Fascículo III: conhecendo o público-alvo da acessibilidade web. 2018. Available on: https://ceweb.br/media/docs/publicacoes/13/cartilha-w3cbr-acessibilidade-web-fasciculo-III.pdf. Accessed on 8 Feb. 2026.
WAI. Techniques for WCAG 2.1. 2025. Available on: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/. Accessed on 15 Jan. 2026.
WHO. World report on vision. Genebra: World Health Organization, 2019. Available on: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516570. Accessed on 2 Mar. 2025.
WOOSUK, S.; JUNG, H. Understanding the community of blind or visually impaired vloggers on YouTube. Universal Access in the Information Society, v. 20, n. 1, p. 31-44, mar. 2021. Available on: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00706-6. Accessed on 1 Mar. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00706-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Juliana de Carvalho Cavalcanti, Jonathas Patrick Hermenegildo de Azevedo, Floripes Teixeira Santos, Fábio José Coutinho da Silva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.


















