<b> The worthlessness of conduct as a criterion for identification of insignificance for the application of the principle of minimum intervention </b> <br> doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n62p97
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n62p97Abstract
This is a work that focuses critically on the stance of the High Courts in regard to the interpretation of the so called principle of insignificance or principle of minimum intervention. It exposes the way in which the Supreme Court and Superior Court have been using the said principle, with the criteria used by the courts, with particular focus on the idea of minimal offensiveness of the conduct. It is proposed to adopt a meaningful concept of action, whose expression leads to a sense of the idea of normative intent of offensiveness able to represent the overall sense of the principle discussed. Finally, in light of this conception, it presents a critique and a proposal for a more precise delimitation of the criteria for applying the principle.Downloads
Published
2011-07-30
How to Cite
BUSATO, Paulo César. <b> The worthlessness of conduct as a criterion for identification of insignificance for the application of the principle of minimum intervention </b> <br> doi:10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n62p97. Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies, Florianópolis, v. 32, n. 62, p. 97–117, 2011. DOI: 10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n62p97. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2011v32n62p97. Acesso em: 2 jul. 2024.
Issue
Section
Artigos
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.