A Weak Counterpoint to a Strong Model: the Supreme Court, the last word and the dialogue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2015v36n71p107Abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2015v36n71p107
The present article aims to critically analyze the characteristics of the Brazilian model
of judicial review, questioning the alleged protagonism of the Supreme Court and proposing
a institutional dialogue between Powers in the interpretation of the Constitution. Apart
from the introduction and conclusion, its structure consists of three topics. First, it will be
rescued the concentration of powers promoted by the Federal Constitution of 1988 and subsequent laws on the Court, whose performance will be criticized on the second topic. In the
third, it will be discussed the proposition of the dialogue and, ultimately, conclusions will be
drawn, noting the perverse effect of the absence of dialogue between the Judicial and Legislative branches.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.