Considerations attributed to designation of the “worst enemy of science” for Paul Feyerabend and your implications for science educations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1982-5153.2017v10n1p329Abstract
Not a few critics of the epistemology of Paul Feyerabend. Many of these criticisms were met with surprise by the author himself, being fruits of misinterpretations of his epistemology by professionals, which he called professionalized incompetence. Among the critics of Feyerabend, some resort to a copy of the prestigious journal Nature in 1987 to provide ballast to his criticisms. In this example, Feyerabend was called the “worst enemy of science”. This paper will seek to examine the arguments which were used to assign such a nickname to Feyerabend, some repercussions and the arguments used by the authors of the journal article Nature match epistemology of Feyerabend or are configured in what he called professionalized incompetence. Some implications of this discussion for the teaching of science are also envisioned.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain the copyright and publishing rights to their works without restrictions.
By submitting their manuscripts, authors grant Revista Alexandria the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and the original publication in this journal.
Authors are also permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work in this journal (for example, depositing it in an institutional repository, posting it on a personal website, publishing translations, or including it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the original publication in Revista Alexandria are properly acknowledged.
