Practices and epistemic movements in the analysis about the results of an experimental inquiry practical activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1982-5153.2018v11n2p337Abstract
This paper is inserted in the studies about discursive interactions in Science Teaching. The goal is to verify which Epistemic Practices and Epistemic Movements are present throughout the analysis of the results in an experimental inquiry practical activity. Thus, it is intended to characterize the proposition of explanations in the interactions between teachers and students. For this, we selected two episodes of a class about the photosynthesis and respiration theme, taught with students of the 7th Middle School. Our results indicate the teachers’ contributions in order that the students could move from the hypothesis formulation’, based on the identification of the light as the experimental variable, to the development of explanations that incorporated the concepts. The resume of prior information allows the ordering of data, which seemed to be important for students to organize information and establish conceptual bases for the subsequent interpretation of the obtained data.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain the copyright and publishing rights to their works without restrictions.
By submitting their manuscripts, authors grant Revista Alexandria the exclusive right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International License. This license allows others to remix, adapt, and build upon the published work, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and the original publication in this journal.
Authors are also permitted to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work in this journal (for example, depositing it in an institutional repository, posting it on a personal website, publishing translations, or including it as a book chapter), provided that authorship and the original publication in Revista Alexandria are properly acknowledged.
