Academic literacies and artificial intelligence: analyzing the simulation of scientific article comprehension through ChatGPT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2025.e103500

Keywords:

Academic literacies, Academic article, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT

Abstract

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) has permeated various contexts, including academia, sparking debates about its potential and limitations in this context. This study aims to analyze the main characteristics of responses generated by the ChatGPT tool when prompted with questions about the composition of academic articles.

Methods: Adopting a descriptive and exploratory approach, this study focuses on interactions with ChatGPT. Five sequential prompts, presented in both Brazilian Portuguese and English, were designed to progressively increase in linguistic complexity.

Results: The analysis revealed that ChatGPT exhibits proficiency in synthesizing information and producing responses that align with academic conventions, highlighting its utility as a research support tool. However, the responses predominantly reflected a skills-based model, emphasizing technical aspects and the formal structure of academic writing—such as organizational clarity and methodological rigor—while neglecting the social and identity dimensions of academic authorship.

Conclusions: While the guidance provided by ChatGPT is valuable for understanding the technical aspects of academic article composition, it is essential for users to cultivate a critical awareness of writing practices. Recognizing the role of academic literacies is crucial for interpreting and constructing knowledge within the academic landscape.

Downloads

Author Biography

Danielly Thaynara da Fonseca Silva, Federal University of Campina Grande

She has a bachelor's degree in Languages from UFCG and a master's degree in Language and Teaching from the Graduate Program in Language and Teaching at UFCG, with a specialization in Applied Linguistics for Education. She has experience in Linguistics, with an emphasis on Applied Linguistics, dealing mainly with academic literacy, academic writing and academic genres. She took part in the PIBID project in 2015 and PIBIC from 2015 to 2017, as well as working as a Portuguese language teacher in the Paraíba State Education Network from 2018 to 2020. Her research and teaching activities focus on academic writing. She is currently CEO of the company Escritamestra.

References

ALJANABI, M. ChatGPT: open possibilities. Mesopotamian J. CyberSecur., Baghdad, v. 2023, 2023. p. 16–17. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCS/2023/003 . Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

ALJANABI, M.; GHAZI, M.; ALI, A. H.; ABED, S. A. ChatGPT: open possibilities. Iraqi J. Comput. Sci. Math., Baghdad, v. 4, n. 1, 2023. p. 62–64. Disponível em: 10.52866/ijcsm.2023.01.01.0018 . Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

ALTMAN, S. ChatGPT Launched on Wednesday. Today it Crossed 1 Million Users!. [@sama], Sam Altman Twitter, 2022.

AYDIN, Ö.; KARAARSLAN, E. Is ChatGPT leading generative AI? What is beyond expectations? Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, v. 11, n. 3, p. 118-134, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4341500 . Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: edições, 70, 1977. 225 p.

BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Traduzido por Luís Antero Reto, Augusto Pinheiro. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2009.

BECKETT, C. New powers, new responsibilities: a global survey of journalism and artificial intelligence. London: The London School of Economics, 2019.

BORJI, A. A categorical archive of ChatGPT failures. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2302.03494, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03494. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

BROWN, T. B., MANN, B., RYDER, N., SUBBIAH, M., KAPLAN, J., DHARIWAL, P., NEELAKANTAN, A., SHYAM, P., SASTRY, G., ASKELL, A., AGARWAL, S., HERBERT-VOSS, A., KRUEGER, G., HENIGHAN, T., CHILD, R., RAMESH, A., ZIEGLER, D. M., WU, J., WINTER, C., HESSE, C., CHEN, M., SIGLER, E., LITWIN, M., GRAY, S., CHESS, B., CLARK, J., BERNER, C., MCCANDLISH, S., RADFORD, A., SUTSKEVER, I., AMODEI, D.. Language models are few-shot learners.arXiv Preprint ,arXiv:2005.14165, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.200514165. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

CASTILLO-GONZALEZ, W. ChatGPT y el futuro de la comunicación científica. Metaverse Basic Appl. Res, Buenos Aires, v. 1, 2022. p. 1–8. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.56294/mr20228 . Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

FARIAS, S. A. Pânico na academia! Inteligência artificial na construção de textos científicos com o uso do ChatGPT. Rev. Interdiscip. Market. Maringá, v. 13, n. 1, 2023. p. 79–83. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4025/rimar.v13i1.66865 . Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

FRIEDMAN, A. AI chatbot predicted to replace Google in a couple of years. [S.l.], 06 dez. 2022. Phone Arena: phonearena.com. Disponível em: https://www.phonearena.com/news/ai-chatbot-could-replace-google-soon_id144120. Acesso em: 07 dez. 2024.

HAMMAD, M. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research. Ann Biomed Eng. v. 51, n. 3, 2023. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36637603/. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2024.

HEAVEN, W. D. OpenAI’s new language generator GPT-3 is shockingly good—and completely mindless. Massachusetts, 20 jul. 2020.MIT Technology Review: technologyreview.com. Disponível em: https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/07/20/1005454/openai-machine-learning-language-generator-gpt-3-nlp/. Acesso em: 05 dez. 2024.

HILSDON, John; MALONE, Cathy; SYSKA, Alicja. Academic literacies twenty years on: a community-sourced literature review. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, [S. l.], n. 15, 2019. Disponível em: https://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/view/567. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2024.

LE, T. T. A preliminary example of utilizing AI text generation to support academic writing: “Humans befriending their creations some notes on the human-AI relationship”. OSF Preprints, 10.31219, 2023. Disponível em: https://osf.io/bsxey. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2024.

LEA, M.R.; STREET, B.V. Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, [S.l.]. v. 6, n. 23, p. 157-172, ago. 1998. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079812331380364. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2022.

LIMA, J. M. T. S. Inteligência artificial na competição: os limites da responsabilidade de um agente econômico em função de atos de concentração operados por programas sofisticados de computador no comércio eletrônico brasileiro. RDC, v. 5, n. 2, 2017, pp. 5-29. Disponível em: https://revista.cade.gov.br/index.php/revistadedefesadaconcorrencia/article/view/328/166. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2024.

LIU, Y., ESAN, O. C.; PAN, Z.; AN, L.. Machine Learning for Advanced Energy Materials. Energy and AI, v. 3, n. 100049. 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100049. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2024.

LILLIS, T.; TUCK, J. ‘Academic Literacies: a critical lens on writing and reading in the academy’. In: HYLAND, K.; SHAW, P. (orgs) The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. London/New York: Routledge, p.30-43. 2015.

LOCK, S. What is the AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace humans?. Manchester, 05 dez. 2022.The Guardian: theguardian.com. Disponível em: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/05/what-is-ai-chatbot-phenomenon-chatgpt-and-could-it-replace-humans. Acesso em: 05 dez. 2024.

MANJOO, Farhad. "How Do You Know a Human Wrote This?" International New York Times, v. 31, 2020. Disponível em: link.gale.com/apps/doc/A631061734/AONE?u=anon~7f5921a4&sid=googleScholar&xid=21dc03cc. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2024.

MIJWIL, M. M., ALJANABI, M.; ALI, A. H. “ChatGPT: Exploring the Role of Cybersecurity in the Protection of Medical Information,” Mesopotamian journal of cybersecurity, v. 2, n. 1, 2023, pp:18-21. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCS/2023/004. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2024.

MIJWIL, M.; ALJANABI, M. ChatGPT: towards artificial intelligence-based cybersecurity: the practices and ChatGPT generated ways to combat cybercrime. Iraqi J. Comput. Sci. Math., Baghdad, v. 4, n. 1, 2023. p. 65–70. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2023.01.01.0019. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

NOAIN-SÁNCHEZ, A. Addressing the impact of artificial intelligence on journalism: the perception of experts, journalists and academics. Commun. Soc., Pamplona, v. 35, n. 3, 2022. p. 105–121. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.3.105-121. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

NGUYEN, A.; NGO, H. N.; HONG, Y.; DANG, B.; NGUYEN, B-P. T. Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Educ Inf Technol, v. 28, n; 64221–4241, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w. Acesso em: 3 abr. 2024.

OPENAI. ChatGPT. [S.l.], 2022. CHATGPT: chat.openai. Disponível em: https://chat.openai.com. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

O'CONNOR, S. ChatGPT, open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: tools for academic progress or abuse? Nurse Educ. Pract., [S.l.] v. 66, 2022. p. 103537. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

PAVLIK, J. V. Collaborating with ChatGPT: considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. J. Mass Commun. Educat., [S.l.], v. 78, n. 1, 2023. p. 84–93. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

ROOSE, K. The brilliance and weirdness of ChatGPT. New York, 12 maio 2022.The New York Times: nytimes.com. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html. Acesso em: 07 dez. 2024.

RODRIGUES, G. S.; BRANDÃO, V. R. A.; TRIVELATO, R. M. S. ChatGPT uma ferramenta para a pesquisa científica?. Código 31: revista de informação, comunicação e interface, Belo Horizonte, v. 2, n. 1, 2024. Disponível em: https://revista.fumec.br/index.php/codigo31/article/view/9916. Acesso em: 07 dez. 2024.

RUDOLPH, J.; TAN, S.; TAN, S. ChatGPT: bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? J. Appl. Learn. Teach., Singapore, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-22. 2022. Disponível em: https://journals.sfu.ca/jalt/index.php/jalt/article/view/689. Acesso em: 07 dez. 2024.

SANTOS, S. M. A. V. GUIMARÃES, C. D.; DEMUNER, J. A.; ORTIZ, L.; MEROTO, M. B. das N.; DE ALENCAR, M. S.; DA SILVA, R. G.; NARCISO, R. Inteligência artificial: uma nova fronteira na educação básica. Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales, v. 17, n. 1, p. 4499-4512, 2024. DOI: 10.55905/revconv.17n.1-268. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.17n.1-268. Acesso em: 21 set. 2024.

SILVA, D.T.F. Artigo acadêmico como prática de letramento na formação de professores de língua portuguesa. 2022. 137f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguagem e Ensino) - Pós-graduação em Linguagem e Ensino, Centro de Humanidades, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Campina Grande, 2022. Disponível em: https://bdtd.ibict.br/vufind/Record/UFCG_c6679f62651c891eb816451cdd0cbabd. Acesso em: 07 dez. 2024.

SILVA, V. L. Ética e responsabilidade na era da inteligência artificial: aprendizagem digital no chat GPT. 2023. 27 p. Monografia (Especialização em Mídia e Educação) - Pós-graduação Lato Sensu em Mídia e Educação, Universidade Federal do Pampa/ Universidade Aberta do Brasil, Campus São Borja, São Borja, 2023. Disponível em: https://dspace.unipampa.edu.br/handle/riu/8334. Acesso em: 07 dez. 2024.

SOUZA, M. N. M. de.; LIMA, P. V. P. de .; SANTOS, K. V. G. dos; LOPES, C. Do GPT 3 ao CHATGPT: potencialidades e alertas no enfoque da produção acadêmica brasileira: . Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA), Boa Vista, v. 16, n. 47, p. 599–620, 2023. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10222348. Disponível em: https://revista.ioles.com.br/boca/index.php/revista/article/view/2732. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

STREET, B. Dimensões “escondidas” na escrita de artigos acadêmicos. Perspectiva, [S. l.], v. 28, n. 2, p. 541–567, 2010. DOI: 10.5007/2175-795X.2010v28n2p541. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/perspectiva/article/view/2175-795X.2010v28n2p541. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2024.

THORP, H. H. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. v. 27, n. 379, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adg7879. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2024.

TÚÑEZ-LÓPEZ, J. M.; TOURAL-BRAN, C.; CACHEIRO-REQUENJO, S. Uso de bots y algoritmos para automatizar la redacción de notícias: percepción y actitudes de los periodistas en España. El Prof. Inf., Barcelona, v. 27, n. 4, 2018. P. 750–758. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.04. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

ZAVALA, V. Quem está dizendo isso? Letramentos acadêmicos, identidade e poder no ensino superior. In: VÓVIO, C.; SITO, L.; DE GRANDE, P. Letramentos: rupturas, deslocamentos e repercussões de pesquisas em linguística aplicada. Mercado de Letras : Campinas, 2010. p. 71-79.

ZHAI, X. ChatGPT user experience: implications for education.Social Science Research Network, [S.l.], 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

ZHAI, X. ChatGPT for next generation science learning. Social Science Research Network, [S.l.], 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/3589649. Acesso em: 10 set. 2024.

Published

2025-03-14

How to Cite

SILVA, Danielly Thaynara da Fonseca. Academic literacies and artificial intelligence: analyzing the simulation of scientific article comprehension through ChatGPT. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, [S. l.], v. 30, p. 1–26, 2025. DOI: 10.5007/1518-2924.2025.e103500. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/103500. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2025.

Issue

Section

Dossier: News scenarios of the Digital Society and the challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence