Knowledge organization as an articulating a space of discursive communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e92002Keywords:
Knowledge organization, Discursive communities, Self-organizationAbstract
Introduction: Knowledge Organization constitutes a cultural construction, permeated by values ??located in space and time, and characterized by a helical nature - open and ascending circular - an aspect that reflects the dynamics of the discursive communities interacting within it, permeated by transformative social forces and for an ethics of reciprocity between communicating individuals.
Objectives: We seek to discuss the nature and characteristics of the triad of discursive communities interacting there - the producer, the user and the organizer/mediator - notably from a perspective of self-organization and in a dynamic movement of helical configuration as an alternative to better understand the processes, instruments and products involved.
Methods: This is a reflection of a theoretical-speculative nature, based on a section of international literature on Knowledge Organization in its sociocultural aspect compared with issues related to discursive communities in order to support the argument about the communicative nature of this context.
Results: The need to consider that those responsible for developing knowledge organization and representation processes as well as those responsible for the idealization and elaboration of knowledge organization systems equally constitute a discursive community which, in turn, must be in full accordance with the other two in order to provide a transcultural ethics of mediation that includes different cultural aspects and their relationships in order to guarantee an effective cultural guarantee.
Conclusion: Considering that knowledge organization represents a human need throughout history, it is believed that the notion of self-organization in the triad of discursive communities involved – production, reception and treatment – when understood in terms of a synergetic, epistemological and ontological vision, it gives greater theoretical meaning and better explanation to the processes, instruments and products involved.
Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, Patrícia de. A hermenêutica na Ciência da Informação: da revisão de literatura ao esboço de uma metodologia. Ibersid: Revista de Sistemas de Información Y Documentación, Zaragoza, v. 16, p. 83-92, 2022.
AMORIM, Igor Soares; CAFÉ, Ligia Maria Arruda. Os conceitos de comunidade discursiva, domínio e linguagem na análise de domínio hjørlandiana. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 17., 2016, Bahia. Anais [...]. Bahia, 2016. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/190585. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2022.
ANDERSON, Benedict. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.
BARITÉ, Mario. Organización del conocimiento: un nuevo marco teórico-conceptual en bibliotecología y documentación. In: CARRARA, Kester (org.). Educação, universidade e pesquisa: textos completos do III Simpósio em Filosofia e Ciência: paradigmas do conhecimento no final do milênio. Marília: Unesp-Marília-Publicações; São Paulo: FAPESP, 2001. p. 35-60.
BARRETO, Aldo de Albuquerque. As palavras voam, a escrita permanece: a aventura do hipertexto. DataGramaZero, Rio de Janeiro, v. 5, n. 5, p. A01, 2004. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/6547. Acesso em: 22 de novembro de 2022.
BEGHTOL, Clare. Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics: aboutness analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents. Journal of Documentation, London, v. 42, n. 2, p. 84-113, June. 1986.
BEGHTOL, Clare. A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems. Journal of Documentation, London, v. 58, n.5, p.507-32, 2002.
BEGHTOL, Clare. Ethical decision-making for knowledge representation and organization systems for global use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Hoboken, NJ, v.56, n.9, p.903-91, 2005.
BERMAN, Sanford. Prejudices and antipathies: a tract of Library of Congress Subjects Headings concerning people. Metuchen: Scarecrow Press, 1971.
BLISS, Henry Evelyn. The organization of knowledge and the system of the sciences. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1929.
BLISS, Henry Evelyn. The organization of knowledge in libraries and the subject-approach to books. New York: The H. W. Wilson Company, 1933.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Capital cultural, escuela y espacio social. Mexico D.F.: Siglo Veiteuno, 1997.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. O capital social: notas provisórias. In: CATANI, A.; NOGUEIRA, M. (org.) Escritos de educação. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1998.
CAFÉ, Lígia; BRASCHER, Marisa. Organização do conhecimento: teorias semânticas base para estudo e representação de conceitos. Informação e Informação, Londrina, v.16, n.3, p. 25-51, 2011. Disponível em: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/informacao/article/view/10388. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2022.
CANEVACCI, Massimo. Sincretismo: uma exploração das hibridações culturais. São Paulo: Studio Nobel; Instituto Cultural Ítalo-Brasileiro; Instituto Italiano de Cultura, 1996.
CAPURRO, Rafael. La Hermenéutica frente al desafío de la técnica digital. Hermeneutics and the challenge of digital technology. Liinc em revista, Rio de Janeiro, n. 2, v. 6, 2010. (Dossiê Linguagem, Informação e Nova Dinâmica Social). Dispónível em: https://revista.ibict.br/liinc/article/view/3264. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2022.
DAHLBERG, Ingetraut. Knowledge organization: its scope and possibilities. Knowledge Organization, Würzburg, v. 20, n. 4, p. 211-222, 1993.
DAHLBERG, Ingetraut. Current trends in knowledge organization. In: García Marco, Francisco Javier (ed.). Organización del conocimiento em sistemas de información y documentación. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza, 1995. p.7-26.
DIAS, Célia Consolação. A análise de domínio, as comunidades discursivas, a garantia da literatura e outras garantias. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, João Pessoa, v. 25, n. 2. p. 7-17, 2015. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ies/article/view/7. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2022.
DROBNICKI, John A. Bliss: The Man and the Classification. City University of New York (CUNY): CUNY Academic Works, 1996. E-Book. Disponível em: http://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=yc_pubs . Acesso em: 16 nov. 2022.
FERNANDES, Geni Chaves. O objeto de estudo da Ciência da Informação. Informare: Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação, Rio de Janeiro, v.1, n.1, p. 25-30, 1995.
FURNER, Jonathan. Interrogating “Identity”: A Philosophical Approach to an Enduring Issue in Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, Wurzburg, v. 36, n. 1, p. 3-16, 2009.
GARCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Antonio. Knowledge Organization from a ‘Culture of the Border’ Towards a Transcultural Ethics of Mediation. In: LÓPEZ HUERTAS, Maria José (ed.). Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Organization for the 21st Century: Integration of Knowledge Across Boundaries. Würzburg: Ergon, 2002. p. 516-22.
GARCÍA MARCO, Francisco Javier. Avances en organización del conocimiento en España: los II encuentros sobre organización del conocimiento en los sistemas de información y documentación. In: GARCÍA MARCO, Francisco Javier (ed.). Organización del conocimiento en sistemas de información y documentación. Zaragoza : Libreria General, 1997. v.1, p. 7-12.
GNOLI, Claudio. Ten Long-Term Research Questions in Knowledge Organization. Knowledge Organization, Wurzburg, v.35, n.2/3, p.137-149, 2008.
GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves. Aspectos éticos em organização e representação do conhecimento (O.R.C.): uma reflexão preliminar. In: González de Gómez, Maria Nélida; Orrico, Evelyn Goyannes Dill (Org.). Políticas de memória e informação: reflexos na organização do conhecimento. Natal: EDUFRN, 2006, p.237-264.
GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves. Slanted knowledge organization as a new ethical perspective. In: ANDERSEN, Jack; SKOUVIG, Laura (eds.). The organization of knowledge: caught between global structures and local meaning. Bingley: Emerald, 2017. p. 87-102
HAAS, Peter M. Do regimes matter: epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization, Cambridge, v. 43, n. 3, p. 377-403, 1989.
HAAS, Peter M. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, Cambridge, v. 46, n. 1, p. 01-35, 1992.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Domain analysis in information Science: eleven approaches traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, London, v. 58, n. 4, p. 422-462, 2002a.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, c v.53, n.4, p. 257-270, 2002b.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Meta-analysis should also be visible inside information science (Letter to the Editor). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Hobroken, NJ, v.53, n.4, p. 324, 2002c.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Arguments for epistemology in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Hobroken, NJ, v. 54, n.8, p. 805-806, 2003.
HJØRLAND, Birger. "What is Knowledge Organization (KO)?" Knowledge Organization, Wurzburg, v.35, n. 2/3, p. 86-101, 2008b.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Hobroken, NJ, v. 60, n.8, p. 1519-1536, 2009.
HJØRLAND, Birger. The foundation of the concept of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Hobroken, NJ, v. 61, n.2, p. 217-237, 2010.
HJØRLAND, Birger. The importance of theories of knowledge: Indexing and information retrieval as an example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Hobroken, NJ, v.62, n.1, p.72-77, 2011.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management, Amsterdam, v.49, n.6, p. 1313-1325, 2013.
HJØRLAND, Birger. "Theories are Knowledge Organizing Systems (KOS)". Knowledge Organization, Wurzburg, v.42, n. 2, p. 113-128, 2015.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Knowledge organization. In: HJØRLAND, Birger; GNOLI, Claudio (eds.) Encyclopedia of knowledge organization. 2017. Disponível em: http://www.isko.org/cyclo/knowledge_organization. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2022.
HJØRLAND, Birger; ALBRECHTSEN, Hanne. Toward a new horizon in Information Science: domain analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Washington, v. 46, n. 6, p. 400-425, 1995.
HJØRLAND, Birger; NICOLAISEN, Jeppe. The social psychology of information use: seeking "friends", avoiding "enemies". Information Research, Sheffield, v.15, n.3, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.informationr.net/ir/15-3/colis7/colis706.html. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2022.
HUDON, Michèle. Multilingual thesaurus construction: integrating the views of different cultures in one gateway to knowledge and concepts. Knowledge Organization, Würzburg, v. 24, n. 2, p. 84-91, 1997.
HUDON, Michèle. Accessing documents and information in a world without frontiers. The Indexer, London, v. 21, n. 4, p. 156-159, 1999.
JAENECKE, Peter. To what end knowledge organization? Knowledge organization, Würzburg,v. 21, n.1, p. 3-11, 1994.
KIEL, Ewald. Knowledge Organization Needs Epistemological Openness. Knowledge Organization, Würzburg, v.21, n.2, p.148-152, 1994.
LARA, Marilda Lara Lopes Ginez de. Informação, informatividade e lingüística documentária: alguns paralelos com as reflexões de Hjorland e Capurro. DataGramaZero, Rio de Janeiro, v. 9, n. 6, 2008. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11959/brapci/6550. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2022.
LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, Maria José. Some current research questions in the field of knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, Würzburg, v.35, n.2/3, p. 113-136, 2008.
MELO, Cidiane Vaz; MAGALHÃES, Andrea Seixas; CARNEIRO, Terezinha Féres; MACHADO, Rebeca Nonato. As dimensões da comunicação na obra freudiana. Contextos Clínicos, São Leopoldo, v.10, n. 2, p.235-246, 2017. Disponível em: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-34822017000200009&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2022.
MENDES, Luciana Corts; LARA, Marilda Lara Lopes Ginez de. Em busca de um corpo teórico-conceitual da ciência da informação: uma análise critíco-hermenêutica. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação, São Paulo, v. 13, p. 10-14, 2017.
Disponível em: https://rbbd.febab.org.br/rbbd/article/view/773. Acesso em 12 nov. 2022.
MEYER, Morgan; MOLYNEUX-HODGSON, Susan. Introduction: the dynamics of epistemic communities. Sociological Research Online, Guildford, v. 15, n. 2, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2154. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2022.
MORIN, Edgar. Cabeça bem-feita: repensar a reforma, reformar o pensamento. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2001.
NASCIMENTO, Denise Morado; MARTELETO, Regina Maria. Social field, domains of knowledge and informational practice. Journal of Documentation, London, v. 64, n. 3, p 397-412, 2008.
OLIVEIRA, Walter Clayton. Ciberespaço, técnica e hermenêutica: diálogos da ciência da informação. 2013. 133 f. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências de Marília, 2013. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/103368. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2022.
OLSON, Hope. A. The power to name: locating the limits of subject representation in libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
POMBO, Olga. Da classificação dos seres à classificação dos saberes. Revista da Biblioteca Nacional de Lisboa, Lisboa, v.2, p. 19-33, 1998.
SAN SEGUNDO, Rosa. Sistemas de organización del conocimiento: la organización del conocimiento en las bibliotecas españolas. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Boletín Oficial del Estado, 1996.
SMIRAGLIA, Richard P. Epistemology of Domain Analysis. In: LEE, Hur Lee.; SMIRAGLIA, Richard P. (eds.). Cultural frames of knowledge. Wurzburg: Ergon, 2012. p.111-124
SMIRAGLIA, Richard P. The Epistemological Dimension of Knowledge Organization. Revista IRIS - Informação, Memória e Tecnologia, v.2, n.1 2013. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/IRIS/article/view/498/402. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2022.
SMIT, Johanna Wilhelmina; BARRETO, Aldo. Albuquerque. Ciência da informação: base conceitual para a formação do profissional. In: VALENTIM, Marta Lígia Pomim (org.). Formação do profissional da informação. São Paulo: Polis, 2002. p.9-23.
SWALES, John M., 1990. The Concept of Discourse Community. In: SWALES, John M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. p. 471-473
TENNIS, Joseph T. Two Axes of Domain Analysis. Knowledge Organization, Wurzburg, v. 30, n.3/4, p.191-195, 2003.
TENNIS, Joseph T. Epistemology, Theory, and Methodology in Knowledge Organization: Toward a Classification, Metatheory, and Research Framework. Knowledge Organization, Wurzburg, v.35, n.2, p.102-112, 2008.
TOGNOLI, Natália Bolfarini, SCHMIDT, Clarissa; GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves. Context as a Core Concept in Archival Knowledge Organization. In: LYKKE, Marianne; SVARRE, Tanja; HAYNES, David; SKOV, M.; THELLEFSEN, Martin; MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA. Daniel (eds.) Knowledge Organization across Disciplines, Domains, Services, and Technologies. Baden-Baden: Ergon, 2022. p.273-284.
TÖNNIES, Ferdinand. Comunidad y Sociedad. Buenos Aires: Losada, 1947.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Walter Clayton de Oliveira, José Augusto Chaves Guimarães
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.