Theoretical-conceptual proposal for analyzing the reliability and credibility of scientific (mis)information in the media: implications for Science Teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2022.e83882Keywords:
Misinformation, Post-Truth, Media, Science Teaching, Science Media LiteracyAbstract
It has become a common strategy in the current scenario, especially after the rise of the Internet and social media, the enacting and production of alternative facts, by simulating the credentials of a genuinely scientific discourse. Transmitting confidence and using a naïve interpretation of the nature of science, influencers and false experts elaborate a persuasive narrative with several goals. Among them, promoting blind skepticism by questioning recommendations from scientific institutions and experts, and claiming for more evidence and irrefutable proof for scientific theories already consolidated into the scientific community. Based on researches that discuss the relevance of epistemic dependence and epistemic trust, we highlight the importance of taking the discussion of institutional and social aspects of science into science classes. For that, we describe problem-solving situations with a scientific component in which the concepts of expertise, credentials, credibility, conflict of interest and scientific consensus can function as a social epistemic structure to analyze the reliability and credibility of scientific (mis)information communicated by the media. Given the current post-truth scenario, our main reflection is that in cases that present a complex epistemological structure of analysis, such as the claims with a scientific component broadcasted by the media, we are all epistemically dependent on each other. In this context, we consider that the fundamental concern is the analysis not of scientific evidence itself, but of evidence and related criteria about who we consider to be an expert to be a spokesperson for science.
References
ALLCHIN, D. Skepticism and the architecture of trust. American Biology Teacher, v. 74, n. 5, p. 358-362, mai. 2012a. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/abt.2012.74.5.17. Acesso em: 03 fev. 2021.
ALLCHIN, D. What counts as science. American Biology Teacher, v. 74, p. 291-294, 2012b. Disponível em: https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article/74/4/291/18429/What-Counts-as-Science. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2021.
ALLCHIN, D. Global warming: scam, fraud, or hoax? American Biology Teacher, v. 77, n. 4, p. 308-312, abr. 2015. Disponível em: https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article/77/4/309/18764/Global-WarmingScam-Fraud-or-Hoax. Acesso em: 30 Mar. 2021.
ALLCHIN, D. From Nature of Science to Social Justice: The political power of epistemic lessons. In: YACOUBIAN, H. A.; HANSSON, L. (Org.). Nature of Science for Social Justice. Switzerland: Springer, 2020a. p. 23-39.
ALLCHIN, D. The Covid-19 Conundrum. The American Biology Teacher, v. 82, n. 6, p. 1-5, ago. 2020b. Disponível em: https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article/82/6/429/111556/The-COVID-19-Conundrum. Acesso em: 01 fev. 2021.
ALLCHIN, D. Ten competencies for the science misinformation crisis. Science Education, p. 1-14, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21746. Acesso em: 31 out. 2022.
ALLCHIN, D.; ZEMPLÉN, G. A. Finding the place of argumentation in science education: epistemics and whole science. Science Education, v. 104, p. 907-933, set. 2020. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sce.21589. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
BETHE, M. J. Reply to my critics: a response to reviews of Darwin’s black box: the biochemical challenge to evolution. Biology and Philosophy, v. 16, n. 5, p. 683-707, nov. 2001. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1012268700496. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2021.
BIERNATH, A. O que a ciência diz sobre uso de máscaras para proteger contra covid-19, colocado em xeque por Bolsonaro. BBC News, São Paulo, 30 de nov. de 2020, Brasil. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-55110433. Acesso em: 03 ago. 2021.
COLLINS, H.; EVANS, R. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, v. 32, p. 235-296, 2002. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/0306312702032002003. Acesso em: 03 de nov. 2022.
COLLINS, H.; EVANS, R. Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
COMTE, A. Introduction to Positive Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1988.
DA REDAÇÃO. Coronavírus: OMS encerra estudos com hidroxicloroquina após ineficácia. Veja, 04 de jul. de 2020, Saúde. Disponível em: https://veja.abril.com.br/saude/coronavirus-oms-encerra-estudos-com-hidroxicloroquina-por-ineficacia/. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2021.
ESCOBAR, H. Brazil’s pick of a creationist to lead its higher education agency rattles scientists. Science, jan. 2020, Latin America. Disponível em: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/brazil-s-pick-creationist-lead-its-higher-education-agency-rattles-scientists. Acesso em: 06 ago. 2021.
FARFAN, T. Governo muda protocolo e autoriza hidroxicloroquina para casos leves de Covid-19. CNN, 20 de mai. de 2020, Brasil. Disponível em: https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/saude/2020/05/20/governo-muda-protocolo-e-autoriza-hidroxicloroquina-para-casos-leves-de-covid-19. Acesso em: 04 ago. 2021.
FLECK, L. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
G1 SP. Justiça determina, pela 2ª vez, que Ministério da Saúde informe se feijão do Pastor Valdemiro Santiago cura Covid-19. G1, 05 de jan. de 2021, São Paulo. Disponível em: https://g1.globo.com/sp/sao-paulo/noticia/2021/01/05/justica-determina-pela-2a-vez-que-ministerio-da-saude-informe-se-feijao-do-pastor-valdemiro-santiago-cura-covid-19.ghtml. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2021.
GRAGNANI, J. Agronegócio banca palestras que espalham mito de que aquecimento global pelo homem é fraude. BBC News Brasil, 18 de nov. de 2021, Londres. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-59310009. Acesso em: 03 de nov. 2022.
HARDWIG, J. Epistemic Dependence. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 82, n. 7, p. 335-349, jul. 1985.
HARDWIG, J. The Role of Trust in Knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, v. 88, n. 12, p. 693-708, dez. 1991.
HÖTTECKE, D.; ALLCHIN, D. Reconceptualizing nature‐of‐science education in the age of social media. Science Education, v. 104, p. 641-666, jul. 2020. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sce.21575. Acesso em: 16 dez. 2020.
IYENGAR, S.; MASSEY, D. S. Science communication in a post‐truth society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, v. 116, n. 16, p. 7656-7661, abr. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.pnas.org/content/116/16/7656/tab-article-info. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2021.
JARMAN, R.; MCCLUNE, B. Developing scientific literacy: using news media in the classroom. Maidenhead, United Kingdom: Open University Press, 2007.
KUHN, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. London: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.
LAZER, D. M. J. et al. The science of fake news. Science, v. 359, p. 1094-1096, mar. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aao2998. Acesso em: 18 mar. 2021.
LEWANDOWSKY, S.; ECKER, U. K. H.; COOK, J. Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, v. 6, p. 353-369, dez. 2017. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211368117300700?casa_token=6rWHU6X7JjMAAAAA:G69dKaHc_64bzUiLSSlh6BB8Q0R4pc8DT-waT-LJ1wRG--asyJKpzfg0SLvON_aetpqV7A6WR_Q. Acesso em: 25 jul. 2021.
LONGINO, H. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
MCDOUGALL, J. et al. Teaching media literacy in Europe: evidence of effective school practices in primary and secondary education, NESET II report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.
MCINTYRE. L. Post-Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.
MCINTYRE, L. The Scientific Attitude. Defending Science from Denial, Fraud, and Pseudoscience. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2019.
MELLOR, F. The Politics of Accuracy in Judging Global Warming Films. Environmental Communication, v. 3, n. 2, p. 134-150, jul. 2009. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17524030902916574?needAccess=true. Acesso em: 16 dez. 2020.
NESTLE, M. Unsavory truth: How food companies skew the science of what we eat. New York: Basic Books, 2018.
NORRIS, S. P. Learning to live with scientific expertise: toward a theory of intellectual communalism for guiding science teaching. Science Education, v. 79, n. 2, p. 201-217, abr. 1995.
NOVO. Presidente da Capes gera polêmica ao defender criacionismo. G1, 28 de jan. de 2020, Jornal Nacional. Disponível em: https://g1.globo.com/jornal-nacional/noticia/2020/01/28/novo-presidente-da-capes-gera-polemica-ao-defender-criacionismo.ghtml. Acesso em: 06 ago. 2021.
OPERA MUNDI. Você não vai se transformar em jacaré: 10 mentiras sobre vacinas que circulam por aí. Brasil de Fato, 19 de dez. de 2020. Disponível em: https://www.brasildefato.com.br/2020/12/19/voce-nao-vai-se-transformar-em-jacare-10-mentiras-sobre-vacinas-que-circulam-por-ai. Acesso em: 02 ago. 2021.
ORESKES, N. Why we should trust scientists [online video]. New York: TED Conferences, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.ted.com/talks/naomi_oreskes_why_we_should_trust_scientists. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2020.
ORESKES, N. Why trust science? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019. 376 p.
ORESKES, N.; CONWAY, E. M. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2010. 360 p.
OXFORD Languages. Word of the Year 2016 is... 2016. Disponível em: https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/2016/. Acesso em: 08 ago. 2021.
OSBORNE, J. et al. Science Education in an Age of Misinformation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2022.
PEREIRA, A. A. G. Documentários de ciências na formação inicial de professores: contribuições para uma leitura crítica sobre o aquecimento global. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, v. 25, n. 2, p. 01-18, ago. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2440493842?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview= true. Acesso em: 23 ago. 2021.
PEREIRA, A. A. G.; DOS SANTOS, C. A. Desinformação e negacionismo no ensino de ciências: sugestão de conhecimentos para se desenvolver uma alfabetização científica midiática. Ensino e Multidisciplinaridade, v. 6, n. 2, p. 21-40, jul./dez. 2020. Disponível em: http://www.periodicoseletronicos.ufma.br/index.php/ens-multidisciplinaridade/article/ view/16626. Acesso em: 24 jan. 2021.
PILLER, C. ‘This is insane!’ Many scientists lament Trump’s embrace of risky malaria drugs for coronavirus. Science, 26 de mar. de 2020, News. Disponível em: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03/insane-many-scientists-lament-trump-s-embrace-risky-malaria-drugs-coronavirus. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2021.
PINTO. A. E. S. OMS recomenda que cloroquina só seja usada em experimentos, sob supervisão. Folha de S. Paulo, 20 de mai. de 2020, São Paulo. Disponível em: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/equilibrioesaude/2020/05/oms-recomenda-que-cloroquina-so-seja-usada-em-experimentos-sob-supervisao.shtml. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2021.
POINCARÉ, H. Science and Hypothesis. New York: The Walter Scott Publishing, 1905.
POPPER, K. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Oxfordshire: Routledge Classics, 2002.
REID, G.; NORRIS, S. P. Scientific media education in the classroom and beyond: a research agenda for the next decade. Cultural Studies of Science Education, v. 11, p. 147-166, mar. 2016. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11422-015-9709-1.pdf. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2021.
REUTERS. Médicos da Índia pedem para que pessoas do país não usem esterco bovino contra a Covid-19. G1, Brasil, 11 de mai. de 2021, Mundo. Disponível em: https://g1.globo.com/mundo/noticia/2021/05/11/medicos-da-india-pedem-para-que-pessoas-do-pais-nao-usem-esterco-bovino-contra-a-covid-19-veja-video.ghtml. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2021.
ROOSE, K.; ROSENBERG, M. Touting Virus Cure, ‘Simple Country Doctor’ Becomes a Right-Wing Star. The New York Times, New York, 02 de abr. de 2020, Technology. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/02/technology/doctor-zelenko-coronavirus-drugs.html. Acesso em: 03 ago. 2021.
SBG. Ciência e Criacionismo. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética, 2012. Acesso em: 06 ago. 2021.
SBPC. Carta: Aos Excelentíssimos Senhores Deputados federais. Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência, 2014. Acesso em: 06 ago. 2021.
SERRANO, P. Desinformação: como os meios de comunicação ocultam o mundo. Rio de Janeiro: Espalhafato, 2010. 68 p.
SIAROVA, H.; STERNADEL, D.; SZŐNYI, E. Research for CULT Committee – science and scientific literacy as an educational challenge, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels, 2019.
ZEMPLÉN, G. A. Putting sociology first - Reconsidering the role of the social in ‘nature of science’ education. Science & Education, v. 18, p. 525-559, mai. 2009. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-007-9125-3. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
DECLARAÇÃO DE RESPONSABILIDADE Certifico que participei da concepção do trabalho, em parte ou na íntegra, que não omiti quaisquer ligações ou acordos de financiamento entre os autores e companhias que possam ter interesse na publicação desse artigo. Certifico que o texto é original e que o trabalho, em parte ou na íntegra, ou qualquer outro trabalho com conteúdo substancialmente similar, de minha autoria, não foi enviado a outra revista e não o será enquanto sua publicação estiver sendo considerada pelo Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, quer seja no formato impresso ou no eletrônico.
Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil - - - eISSN 2175-7941 - - - está licenciada sob Licença Creative Commons > > > > >