Promover a prosódia na leitura: efeitos de uma intervenção sistemática

Autor/innen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2025.e104339

Schlagworte:

Prosódia, Fluência de leitura, Intervenção sistemática

Abstract

Promover a leitura é um desafio para todos os sistemas educativos, assumindo especial importância em períodos de perda significativa de aprendizagens, como ocorreu na sequência da pandemia de Covid-19. A fluência de leitura tem sido considerada uma das competências mais relevantes, dada a sua imprescindibilidade para que o leitor consiga construir significados a partir do texto lido. Contudo, a prosódia, uma dimensão da fluência de leitura, tem recebido menor atenção em termos de investigação, especialmente no caso de estudantes em risco na aprendizagem da leitura. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o impacto de uma intervenção na competência de prosódia em estudantes em risco. Foi realizado um estudo randomizado com dois grupos: um grupo de intervenção (N=67) e um grupo de controlo (N=80). A intervenção envolveu diversas estratégias, incluindo leitura modelo, exploração de palavras desafiantes, leitura em eco, e auto e heteroavaliação. Ambos os grupos foram submetidos a avaliações pré e pós-intervenção. Os resultados indicam que não houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os dois grupos na dimensão da prosódia após a intervenção, embora o grupo experimental tenha mostrado um crescimento mais evidente nessa competência. Estes resultados sugerem a necessidade de repensar a duração das intervenções e as estratégias implementadas para promover a prosódia.

Autor/innen-Biografien

Joana Cruz, Lusíada University of Porto

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade do Minho, UMinho, Portugal.

Bruna Rodrigues, Lusíada University of Porto

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade do Minho, UMinho, Portugal.

Diana Alves, Universidade do Porto

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade do Porto, UPorto, Portugal.

Irene Cadime, University of Minho

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade do Minho, UMinho, Portugal.

Literaturhinweise

ARDOIN, Scott; MORENA, Laura; BINDER, Katherine; FOSTER, Tori. Examining the impact of feedback and repeated readings on oral reading fluency: Let’s not forget prosody. School Psychology Quarterly, v. 28, n. 4, p. 391–395, 2013.

BEGENY, John; ROSS, Sarah; GREENE, Diana; MITCHELL, Rachel; WHITEHOUSE, Mary. Effects of the helping early literacy with practice strategies (HELPS) reading fluency program with Latino English language learners: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Education, v. 21, n. 2, p. 134–149, 2012.

BENNETT, Jessica; GARDNER III, Ralph; CARTLEDGE, Gwendolyn; RAMNATH, Rajiv; COUNCIL III, Morris. Second-grade urban learners: Preliminary findings for a computer-assisted, culturally relevant, repeated reading intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, v. 40, n. 2, p. 145–185, 2017.

CADIME, Irene; SANTOS, Sandra; VIANA, Fernanda Leopoldina; RIBEIRO, Iolanda. The relationship of oral reading fluency endurance to comprehension in an intermediate depth orthography. Psicología Educativa, v. 29, n. 2, p. 143–148, 2023.

CALET, Nuria; GUTIÉRREZ-PALMA, Nicolás; DEFIOR, Sylvia. Effects of fluency training on reading competence in primary school children: The role of prosody. Learning and Instruction, v. 52, p. 59–68, 2017.

DAANE, Mary; CAMPBELL, Jay; GRIGG, Wendy; GOODMAN, Madeline; ORANJE, Andreas. Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006-469). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics: Government Printing Office, 2005.

GODDE, Erika; BOSSE, Marie-Line; BAILLY, Gérard. A review of reading prosody acquisition and development. Reading and Writing, v. 33, n. 2, p. 399–426, 2020.

GODDE, Erika; BOSSE, Marie-Line; BAILLY, Gérard. Pausing and breathing while reading aloud: Development from 2nd to 7th grade. Reading and Writing, v. 35, n. 1, p. 1-33. 2022.

HUDSON, Alida; KOH, Poh Wee; MOORE, Karol; BINKS‐CANTRELL, Emily. Fluency interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties: A synthesis of research from 2000–2019. Education Sciences, v. 10, n. 3, 2020.

HUDSON, Roxanne; LANE, Holly; PULLEN, Paige. Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, v. 58, n. 8, p. 702–714, 2005.

KLAUDA, Susan Lutz; GUTHRIE, John. Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 100, n. 2, p. 310–321, 2008.

KUHN, Melanie; SCHWANENFLUGEL, Paula; MEISINGER, Elizabeth. Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, v. 45, n. 2, p. 230–251, 2010.

KUHN, Melanie; STAHL, Steven. Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 95, n. 1, p. 3-21, 2003.

LOPES, João; SILVA, Maria Madalena; MONIZ, António; SPEAR-SWERLING, Louise; ZIBULSKY, Jamie. Evolução da prosódia e compreensão da leitura: Um estudo longitudinal do 2º ano ao final do 3º ano de escolaridade. Revista de Psicodidactica, v. 20, n. 1, p. 5–23, 2015.

MAKI, Kathrin; ITTNER, Anne; PULLES, Sandra; BURNS, Matthew; HELMAN, Lori; MCCOMAS, Jennifer. Effects of an abbreviated class wide reading intervention for students in third grade. Contemporary School Psychology, v. 26, n. 3, p. 359–367. 2022.

MCTEER, Janis; RASINSKI, Timothy; BINTZ, William. Teaching fluency through whole-class repeated reading. Journal of Teacher Action Research, v. 9, n.1, p. 2-23. 2022.

MICIAK, Jeremy; ROBERTS, Garrett; TAYLOR, Pat; SOLIS, Michael; Ahmed, Yusra; VAUGHN, Sharon; FLETCHER, Jack. The effects of one versus two years of intensive reading intervention implemented with late elementary struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, v. 33, n. 1, p. 24–36, 2018.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.

NAVEENKUMAR, Nithya; GEORGIOU, George; VIEIRA, Ana Paula Alves; ROMERO, Sandra; PARRILA, Rauno. A systematic review on quality indicators of randomized control trial reading fluency intervention studies. Reading and Writing Quarterly, v. 38, n. 4, p. 359–378, 2022.

ÖZBEK, Ahmet Bilal; GIRLI, Alev. The effectiveness of a tablet computer-aided intervention program for improving reading fluency. Universal Journal of Educational Research, v. 5, n. 5, p. 757–764. 2017.

PIKULSKI, John; CHARD, David. Fluency: The bridge from decoding to reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, v. 58, n. 6, 510–519, 2005.

RASINSKI, Timothy. Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning, 2004.

RASINSKI, Timothy; REUTZEL, Ray; CHARD, David; & LINAN-THOMPSON, Sylvia. Reading Fluency. In KAMIL, M. L.; PEARSON, P. D.; MOJE, B.; AFFLERBACH, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research. London; Routledge, 2011, p. 286–319.

SHHUB, Aya; JIMENEZ, Zaira; SOLIS, Michael. A synthesis of reading prosody: Evaluating phrasing and syntax interventions. Reading and Writing Quarterly, v. 39, n. 6, p. 530–547, 2023.

SUGGATE, Sebastian. A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, v. 49, n. 1, p. 77–96. 2016.

SZADOKIERSKI, Isadora; BURNS, Matthew; MCCOMAS, Jennifer. Predicting intervention effectiveness from reading accuracy and rate measures through the instructional hierarchy: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, v. 46, n. 2, p. 190–200, 2017.

THERRIEN, William. Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, v. 25, n. 4, p. 252–261, 2004.

TIGHE, Elizabeth; SCHATSCHNEIDER, Christopher. Examining the relationships of component reading skills to reading comprehension in struggling adult readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, v. 49, n. 4, p. 395–409, 2014.

VEENENDAAL, Nathalie; GROEN, Margriet; VERHOEVEN, Ludo. Bidirectional relations between text reading prosody and reading comprehension in the upper primary school grades: A longitudinal perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, v. 20, n. 3, p. 189–202, 2016.

YOUNG, Chase; PEARCE, Daniel; GOMEZ, Jeannette; CHRISTENSEN, Rosalynn; PLETCHER, Bethanie; FLEMING, Kathleen. Read Two Impress and the Neurological Impress Method: Effects on elementary students’ reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude. The Journal of Educational Research, v. 111, n. 6, p. 657–665, 2018.

ZIMMERMAN, Belinda; RASINSKI, Timothy; WAS, Christopher; RAWSON, Katherine; DUNLOSKY, John; KRUSE, Sharon; NIKBAKHT, Elham. Enhancing outcomes for struggling readers: Empirical analysis of the Fluency Development Lesson. Reading Psychology, v. 40, n. 1, p. 70–94, 2019.

ZUTELL, Jerry; RASINSKI, Timothy. Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory Into Practice, v. 30, n. 3, p. 211–217, 1991.

Veröffentlicht

2025-11-03

Zitationsvorschlag

Cruz, J., Rodrigues, B., Alves, D., & Cadime, I. (2025). Promover a prosódia na leitura: efeitos de uma intervenção sistemática. Perspectiva, 43(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2025.e104339

Ausgabe

Rubrik

Dossiê A escola remota aconteceu: e agora, cadê o leitor?