Promoting prosody in reading: effects of a systematic intervention

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2025.e104339

Keywords:

Prosody, Reading fluency, Systematic intervention

Abstract

Promoting reading skills presents a challenge for educational systems, especially during periods of significant learning loss, such as the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the critical reading skills, reading fluency is essential for constructing meaning from text. However, prosody, a key component of reading fluency, has been under-researched, particularly among students at risk for reading difficulties. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an intervention on prosody competence in at-risk students. We conducted a randomized controlled trial with two groups: an intervention group (N=67) and a control group (N=80). The intervention included strategies such as model reading, exploration of challenging words, echo reading, and self- and peer assessment. Both groups underwent pre- and post-intervention assessments. The findings revealed no statistically significant differences in prosody between the two groups following the intervention, although the experimental group demonstrated more noticeable improvement. These results underscore the need to reconsider the duration and strategies of interventions aimed at enhancing prosody skills.

Author Biographies

Joana Cruz, Lusíada University of Porto

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade do Minho, UMinho, Portugal.

Bruna Rodrigues, Lusíada University of Porto

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade do Minho, UMinho, Portugal.

Diana Alves, Universidade do Porto

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade do Porto, UPorto, Portugal.

Irene Cadime, University of Minho

Doutora em Psicologia pela Universidade do Minho, UMinho, Portugal.

References

ARDOIN, Scott; MORENA, Laura; BINDER, Katherine; FOSTER, Tori. Examining the impact of feedback and repeated readings on oral reading fluency: Let’s not forget prosody. School Psychology Quarterly, v. 28, n. 4, p. 391–395, 2013.

BEGENY, John; ROSS, Sarah; GREENE, Diana; MITCHELL, Rachel; WHITEHOUSE, Mary. Effects of the helping early literacy with practice strategies (HELPS) reading fluency program with Latino English language learners: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Education, v. 21, n. 2, p. 134–149, 2012.

BENNETT, Jessica; GARDNER III, Ralph; CARTLEDGE, Gwendolyn; RAMNATH, Rajiv; COUNCIL III, Morris. Second-grade urban learners: Preliminary findings for a computer-assisted, culturally relevant, repeated reading intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, v. 40, n. 2, p. 145–185, 2017.

CADIME, Irene; SANTOS, Sandra; VIANA, Fernanda Leopoldina; RIBEIRO, Iolanda. The relationship of oral reading fluency endurance to comprehension in an intermediate depth orthography. Psicología Educativa, v. 29, n. 2, p. 143–148, 2023.

CALET, Nuria; GUTIÉRREZ-PALMA, Nicolás; DEFIOR, Sylvia. Effects of fluency training on reading competence in primary school children: The role of prosody. Learning and Instruction, v. 52, p. 59–68, 2017.

DAANE, Mary; CAMPBELL, Jay; GRIGG, Wendy; GOODMAN, Madeline; ORANJE, Andreas. Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006-469). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics: Government Printing Office, 2005.

GODDE, Erika; BOSSE, Marie-Line; BAILLY, Gérard. A review of reading prosody acquisition and development. Reading and Writing, v. 33, n. 2, p. 399–426, 2020.

GODDE, Erika; BOSSE, Marie-Line; BAILLY, Gérard. Pausing and breathing while reading aloud: Development from 2nd to 7th grade. Reading and Writing, v. 35, n. 1, p. 1-33. 2022.

HUDSON, Alida; KOH, Poh Wee; MOORE, Karol; BINKS‐CANTRELL, Emily. Fluency interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties: A synthesis of research from 2000–2019. Education Sciences, v. 10, n. 3, 2020.

HUDSON, Roxanne; LANE, Holly; PULLEN, Paige. Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, v. 58, n. 8, p. 702–714, 2005.

KLAUDA, Susan Lutz; GUTHRIE, John. Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 100, n. 2, p. 310–321, 2008.

KUHN, Melanie; SCHWANENFLUGEL, Paula; MEISINGER, Elizabeth. Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, v. 45, n. 2, p. 230–251, 2010.

KUHN, Melanie; STAHL, Steven. Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 95, n. 1, p. 3-21, 2003.

LOPES, João; SILVA, Maria Madalena; MONIZ, António; SPEAR-SWERLING, Louise; ZIBULSKY, Jamie. Evolução da prosódia e compreensão da leitura: Um estudo longitudinal do 2º ano ao final do 3º ano de escolaridade. Revista de Psicodidactica, v. 20, n. 1, p. 5–23, 2015.

MAKI, Kathrin; ITTNER, Anne; PULLES, Sandra; BURNS, Matthew; HELMAN, Lori; MCCOMAS, Jennifer. Effects of an abbreviated class wide reading intervention for students in third grade. Contemporary School Psychology, v. 26, n. 3, p. 359–367. 2022.

MCTEER, Janis; RASINSKI, Timothy; BINTZ, William. Teaching fluency through whole-class repeated reading. Journal of Teacher Action Research, v. 9, n.1, p. 2-23. 2022.

MICIAK, Jeremy; ROBERTS, Garrett; TAYLOR, Pat; SOLIS, Michael; Ahmed, Yusra; VAUGHN, Sharon; FLETCHER, Jack. The effects of one versus two years of intensive reading intervention implemented with late elementary struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, v. 33, n. 1, p. 24–36, 2018.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.

NAVEENKUMAR, Nithya; GEORGIOU, George; VIEIRA, Ana Paula Alves; ROMERO, Sandra; PARRILA, Rauno. A systematic review on quality indicators of randomized control trial reading fluency intervention studies. Reading and Writing Quarterly, v. 38, n. 4, p. 359–378, 2022.

ÖZBEK, Ahmet Bilal; GIRLI, Alev. The effectiveness of a tablet computer-aided intervention program for improving reading fluency. Universal Journal of Educational Research, v. 5, n. 5, p. 757–764. 2017.

PIKULSKI, John; CHARD, David. Fluency: The bridge from decoding to reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, v. 58, n. 6, 510–519, 2005.

RASINSKI, Timothy. Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning, 2004.

RASINSKI, Timothy; REUTZEL, Ray; CHARD, David; & LINAN-THOMPSON, Sylvia. Reading Fluency. In KAMIL, M. L.; PEARSON, P. D.; MOJE, B.; AFFLERBACH, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research. London; Routledge, 2011, p. 286–319.

SHHUB, Aya; JIMENEZ, Zaira; SOLIS, Michael. A synthesis of reading prosody: Evaluating phrasing and syntax interventions. Reading and Writing Quarterly, v. 39, n. 6, p. 530–547, 2023.

SUGGATE, Sebastian. A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, v. 49, n. 1, p. 77–96. 2016.

SZADOKIERSKI, Isadora; BURNS, Matthew; MCCOMAS, Jennifer. Predicting intervention effectiveness from reading accuracy and rate measures through the instructional hierarchy: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, v. 46, n. 2, p. 190–200, 2017.

THERRIEN, William. Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, v. 25, n. 4, p. 252–261, 2004.

TIGHE, Elizabeth; SCHATSCHNEIDER, Christopher. Examining the relationships of component reading skills to reading comprehension in struggling adult readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, v. 49, n. 4, p. 395–409, 2014.

VEENENDAAL, Nathalie; GROEN, Margriet; VERHOEVEN, Ludo. Bidirectional relations between text reading prosody and reading comprehension in the upper primary school grades: A longitudinal perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, v. 20, n. 3, p. 189–202, 2016.

YOUNG, Chase; PEARCE, Daniel; GOMEZ, Jeannette; CHRISTENSEN, Rosalynn; PLETCHER, Bethanie; FLEMING, Kathleen. Read Two Impress and the Neurological Impress Method: Effects on elementary students’ reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude. The Journal of Educational Research, v. 111, n. 6, p. 657–665, 2018.

ZIMMERMAN, Belinda; RASINSKI, Timothy; WAS, Christopher; RAWSON, Katherine; DUNLOSKY, John; KRUSE, Sharon; NIKBAKHT, Elham. Enhancing outcomes for struggling readers: Empirical analysis of the Fluency Development Lesson. Reading Psychology, v. 40, n. 1, p. 70–94, 2019.

ZUTELL, Jerry; RASINSKI, Timothy. Training teachers to attend to their students’ oral reading fluency. Theory Into Practice, v. 30, n. 3, p. 211–217, 1991.

Published

2025-11-03

How to Cite

Cruz, J., Rodrigues, B., Alves, D., & Cadime, I. (2025). Promoting prosody in reading: effects of a systematic intervention. Perspectiva, 43(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2025.e104339

Issue

Section

Dossiê A escola remota aconteceu: e agora, cadê o leitor?