Is there a difference between reading and oral comprehension at the end of the fundamental course?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2026.e102123Keywords:
Reading comprehension, Oral comprehension, Reading assessmentAbstract
Oral comprehension has been largely overlooked compared to written comprehension, not only in research but also in teaching, especially in Brazil. To address this gap, the present study compared the comprehension of oral (OC) and written (WC) texts in 336 8th-grade students (average age = 14 years, 192 girls). The texts were balanced for complexity and length and followed by multiple-choice questions targeting literal or inferential understanding. Students were divided into groups according to their reading performance: low (LPR) (64 = 19%), medium (MPR) (197 = 58.6%), and high (HPR) (75 = 22.3%). Results showed that students achieved higher scores on written modality (WM) questions than on oral modality (OM) questions, and lower scores on inferential questions compared to literal ones, with the LPR group performing worst overall. Similar results emerged in the within-subject analysis. These findings suggest that distinct profiles of written and oral comprehension exist among students at the end of elementary school. Moreover, implicit content appears to pose a greater challenge in OM than in WM. Understanding the relationship between these two skills can provide insights into the origins of reading and listening comprehension difficulties to inform both pedagogical and clinical interventions.
References
ALVES, U. K., FINGER, I. Alfabetização em contextos monolíngue e bilíngue. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2023.
BADDELEY, A. Working memory. Current Biology, v. 20, n. 4, p. R136-R140, 2010.
BARETTA, D.; PEREIRA, V. W. Compreensão literal e inferencial em alunos do Ensino Fundamental. Signo, v. 43, n. 77, p. 53-61, 2018.
BECK, D. L.; FLEXER, C. Listening is where hearing meets brain... in children and adults. Hearing Review, v. 18, n. 2, p. 30-35, 2011.
BERGER, N. S.; PERFETTI, C. A. Reading skill and memory for spoken and written discourse. Journal of Reading Behavior, v. 9, n. 1, p. 7-16, 1977.
BERNINGER, V. W.; ABBOTT, R. D. Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 102, n. 3, p. 635-651, 2010.
BEST, R. M.; FLOYD, R. G.; MCNAMARA, D. S. Differential competencies contributing to children's comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, v. 29, n. 2, p. 137-164, 2008.
BOWYER‐CRANE, C.; SNOWLING, M. J. Assessing children's inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure?. British Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 75, n. 2, p. 189-201, 2005.
BRAND-GRUWEL, S.; AARNOUTSE, C. A. J.; VAN DEN BOS, K. P. Improving text comprehension strategies in reading and listening settings. Learning and Instruction, v. 8, n. 1, p. 63-81, 1998.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação. PDE: Plano de Desenvolvimento da Educação: Prova Brasil: ensino fundamental: matrizes de referência, tópicos e descritores. Brasília: MEC, SEB; Inep, 2008.
BRIDON, J.; NEITZEL, A. D. A. Competências leitoras no Saeb: qualidade da leitura na educação básica. Educação & Realidade, v. 39, n. 2, p. 437-462, 2014.
BUCHWEITZ, A. et al. Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension. Psychology & Neuroscience, v. 2, n. 2, p. 111-123, 2009.
CADIME, I. et al. Compreensão de textos: Diferenças em função da modalidade de apresentação da tarefa, tipo de texto e tipo de pergunta. Análise Psicológica, v. 35, n. 3, p. 351-366, 2017.
CAIN, K. et al. Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, v. 29, n. 6, p. 850-859, 2001.
CAPELLINI, S. A.; OLIVEIRA, A. M. D.; CUETOS, F. PROLEC: Provas de avaliação dos processos de leitura. São Paulo (SP): Casa do Psicólogo, 2012.
CAPOVILLA, F. C.; SEABRA, A. G. Teste Contrastivo de Compreensão Auditiva e de Leitura. In: SEABRA, A. G.; DIAS, N. M.; CAPOVILLA, F. C. Avaliação Neuropsicológica Cognitiva: leitura, escrita e aritmética. São Paulo: Editora Memnon, 2013. p. 29-53.
CARLISLE, J. F. Diagnosing comprehension deficits through listening and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, v. 39, n. 1, p. 159-176, 1989.
CARRETTI, B. et al. Improving reading comprehension in reading and listening settings: The effect of two training programmes focusing on metacognition and working memory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 84, n. 2, p. 194-210, 2014.
CATTS, H. W.; ADLOF, S. M.; WEISMER, S. E. Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, v. 49, n. 2, p. 278-293, 2006.
CHANG, E. M.; AVILA, C. R. B. D. Compreensão leitora nos últimos anos dos ciclos I e II do Ensino Fundamental. CoDAS, v. 26, n. 4, p. 276-285, 2014.
CHIKALANGA, I. A suggested taxonomy of inferences for the reading teacher. Reading in a Foreign Language, v. 8, n. 2, p. 697-709, 1992.
CHRISTOPHER, M. E. et al. The genetic and environmental etiologies of the relations between cognitive skills and components of reading ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, v. 145, n. 4, p. 451, 2016.
CLARKE, P. J.; HENDERSON, L. M.; TRUELOVE, E. The poor comprehender profile: understanding and supporting individuals who have difficulties extracting meaning from text. In: BAUER, P. (Ed.). Advances in Child Development and Behavior. London: Elsevier Inc., 2010. p. 80-129.
CLINTON-LISELL, V. Listening Ears or Reading Eyes: a Meta-Analysis of Reading and Listening Comprehension Comparisons. Review of Educational Research, v. 92, n. 4, p. 543-582, 2022.
COLENBRANDER, D. et al. Individual differences in the vocabulary skills of children with poor reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, v. 50, p. 210-220, 2016.
COLEY, R. J. Differences in the gender gap: comparisons across racial/ethnic groups in education and work. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 2001.
CORSO, H. V.; SPERB, T. M.; SALLES, J. F. Comparação entre maus compreendedores e bons leitores em tarefas neuropsicológicas. Revista Psicologia em Pesquisa, v. 7, n. 1, p. 37-49, 2013.
CORSO, H. V. et al. Normas de desempenho em compreensão de leitura textual para crianças de 1º ano a 6ª série. Psico, v. 46, n. 1, p. 68-78, 2015.
DENIZ, F. et al. The representation of semantic information across human cerebral cortex during listening versus reading is invariant to stimulus modality. Sociology of Neuroscience, v. 39, p. 7722–7736, 2019.
DEWITZ, P.; DEWITZ, P. K. They can read the words, but they can't understand: Refining comprehension assessment. The Reading Teacher, v. 56, n. 5, p. 422-435, 2003.
DIAKIDOY, I. A. N. et al. The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, v. 26, n. 1, p. 55-80, 2005.
DIAS, N. M.; MONTIEL, J. M.; SEABRA, A. G. Development and interactions among academic performance, word recognition, listening, and reading comprehension. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, v. 28, n. 2, p. 404-415, 2015.
DURRELL, D. D. Listening comprehension versus reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, v. 12, n. 6, p. 455-460, 1969.
ELWÉR, A. Early predictors of Reading comprehension difficulties. 2014. 86 f. Thesis (Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning) - Linköping University, Linköping, 2014.
FROST, J. et al. Semantic and phonological skills in predicting reading development: From 3–16 years of age. Dyslexia, v. 11, n. 2, p. 79-92, 2005.
GOUGH, P. B.; TUNMER, W. E. Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, v. 7, n. 1, p. 6-10, 1986.
HARLAAR, N. et al. Predicting individual differences in reading comprehension: A twin study. Annals of Dyslexia, v. 60, n. 2, p. 265-288, 2010.
HOOVER, W. A.; GOUGH, P. B. The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, v. 2, n. 2, p. 127-160, 1990.
HULME, C.; SNOWLING, M. J. Children's reading comprehension difficulties: Nature, causes, and treatments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, v. 20, n. 3, p. 139-142, 2011.
HUTTON, J. S. et al. Home reading environment and brain activation in preschool children listening to stories. Pediatrics, v. 136, n. 3, p. 466-478, 2015.
KEENAN, J. M. et al. Genetic and environmental influences on reading and listening comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, v. 29, n. 1, p. 75-91, 2006.
KEENAN, J. M. et al. Issues in identifying poor comprehenders. L'Année Psychologique, v. 114, n. 4, p. 753-777, 2014.
KINTSCH, W. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
MAIA, M. Psicolinguística: Diversidades, Interfaces e Aplicações. São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2022.
MEYER, M. S. et al. Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, v. 31, n. 2, p. 106-117, 1998.
MILLER, S. D.; SMITH, D. E. Relations among oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension of students at differing competency levels. Literacy Research and Instruction, v. 29, n. 2, p. 73-84, 1989.
MOKHTARI, K.; REICHARD, C. A. Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 94, n. 2, p. 249–259, 2002.
NATION, K. et al. A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, v. 51, n. 9, p. 1031-1039, 2010.
NIKAEDO, C. et al. Nível de leitura e compreensão de sentenças faladas no Ensino Fundamental: diagnóstico diferencial dos problemas de leitura. Revista Psicopedagogia, v. 23, n. 71, p. 107-115, 2006.
OAKHILL, J. Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 54, n. 1, p. 31-39, 1984.
OAKHILL, J.; CAIN, K.; ELBRO, C. Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: A handbook. Routledge, 2014.
OECD. PISA 2022 results: Factsheets - Brazil. OECD, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/webbooks/dynamic/pisa-country-notes/61690648/pdf/brazil.pdf. Acesso em: 25 mar. 2024.
OLIVEIRA, K. L. D.; BORUCHOVITCH, E.; SANTOS, A. A. A. D. Compreensão de leitura em alunos de sétima e oitava séries do ensino fundamental. Revista Semestral da Associação Brasileira de Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, v. 11, n. 1, p. 41-49, 2007.
OLIVEIRA, K. L. D.; LÚCIO, P. S.; MIGUEL, F. K. Considerações sobre a habilidade de compreensão em leitura e formas de sua avaliação. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, v. 20, n. 1, p. 69-77, 2016.
PEARSON, P. D.; FIELDING, L. Research update: Listening comprehension. Language Arts, v. 59, n. 6, p. 617-629, 1982.
PERFETTI, C. A. et al. The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In: SNOWLING, M. J.; HULME, C. (Eds.). The science of reading: A handbook. v. 9. John Wiley & Sons, 2005, p. 227-247.
PINHEIRO. M. V.; VILHENA, D. D. A.; SANTOS, M. A. D. C. PROLEC-T–Text Comprehension Test: Psychometric Properties Analysis. Trends in Psychology, v. 25, n. 3, p. 1067-1080, 2017.
SCHLEICHER, A. Pisa 2018: insights and interpretations. OECD, 2018.
SOUSA, L. B.; HÜBNER, L. C. Desafios na avaliação da compreensão leitora: demanda cognitiva e leiturabilidade textual. Neuropsicología Latinoamericana, v. 7, n. 1, 2015.
SOUSA, L. B.; HÜBNER, L. C. A relação entre desempenho em compreensão leitora e fatores socioeconômicos. Fórum Linguístico, v.14, n. 2, p. 2044 - 2060, abr./jun.2017.
SOUSA, L. B.; HÜBNER, L. C. Traçando o perfil de bons leitores e de leitores com dificuldades de compreensão. Linguagem em (Dis) curso, v. 20, p. 97-108, 2020.
SPENCER, M.; WAGNER, R. K. The comprehension problems of children with poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, v. 88, n. 3, p. 366-400, 2018.
STANOVICH, K. E. Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, v. 21, n. 4, p. 360-407, 1986.
STICHT, T. G. et al. Auding and reading: A developmental model. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization, 1974.
STICHT, T.; JAMES, J. Listening and reading. In: PEARSON, P. (Ed.). Handbook of research on reading. New York: Longman, 1984, p. 293-317.
TEAM, RStudio. RStudio: integrated development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, 2015.
WOLF, M. C. et al. The relationship between reading and listening comprehension: shared and modality-specific components. Reading and Writing, v. 32, p. 1747-1767, 2019.
YEARI, M. et al. Online and offline inferential and textual processing of poor comprehenders: Evidence from a probing method. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, v. 155, p. 12-31, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lucilene Bender de Sousa, Lilian Cristine H¨übner

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides open access to all of it content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, which has designed this system to improve the scholarly and public quality of research, and which freely distributes the journal system as well as other software to support the open access publishing of scholarly resources. The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
The Perspectiva allow the author(s) yo hold the copyright without restrictions as well as publishing rights. If the paper will be republished later in another format, the author(s) should inform that it has originally been published as article in Perspectiva Journal and quote the complete references.
