Didactics and philosophy of history in the 21st century: new challenges for thinking about history teaching

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2025.e105053

Keywords:

Contemporary philosophy of history, History teaching, Teaching practices’ analysis

Abstract

Along the lines of a previously published article (focusing on the innovations of the philosophy of history of the 20th century), this article takes aim at the possible relationships between history teaching practice analysis and the innovations of the philosophy of history of the 21st century. It address successively the issues related to the possibilities of historiography to represent the past, the new ways of focusing on historical time –not always necessarily linear– which implies for some authors the presence, real or ghostly, of the past in the present. The article especially ponders the possibilities opened by said approaches in the field the analysis of teaching history practice. On the other hand, it will address the ways in which these possibilities are not always compatible with the classroom experience, both in the way of focusing on the discursive aspects that run through the work of teaching –and learning– history, as well as in the temporal issues that play between presence and absence, of the past in the present, of the present in the view of the past and its possible projections towards the future.

Author Biography

Ana Zavala, Universidad CLAEH

Profesora de historia y de didáctica de historia, actualmente retirada. Directora de la Maestría en Didáctica de Historia, CLAEH-Universidad, Uruguay, desde su creación en 2008 hasta 2012. Actualmente dirijo las tesis de los primeros maestrandos y desarrollo actividad académica internacional.

References

ANKERSMIT, Frank. Historical representation. History and Theory, v. 27, n. 3, p. 205-228, 1988.

ANKERSMIT, Frank. Narrative logic. A semanticanalysis of the historian’s language. The Hague/ Boston/ London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1983.

AUGÉ, Marc. Los no lugares. Espacios del anonimato. Una antropología de la sobremodernidad. Barcelona: Gedisa. 2000.

BARTHES, Roland. Introducción al análisis estructural de los relatos. In NICCOLINI Silvia (Org.), El análisis estructural. Buenos Aires, Centro Editor de América Latina, 1977, p. 65-101.

BARTHES, Roland. Palimpsestos. La literatura en segundo grado. Madrid: Taurus, 1989.

BEVERNAGE, Berber y LORENZ, Chis. Breaking up time. Negotiating the borders between present, past and future. Storia della Storiografia v. 63, n. 1, p. 32-50, 2013. (Reimpreso en: BEVERNAGE, Berber y LORENZ, Chis (Org). Breaking up time. Negotiating the borders between present, past and future (pp.7-35). Göttingen,Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013).

CHAKRABARTY, Dipesh. Al margen de Europa. Pensamiento poscolonial y diferencia histórica. Madrid: Tusquets, 2008.

CUESTA, Raimundo. Clío en las aulas. Madrid: Akal, 1998.

DANTO, Arthur. Historia y narración: Ensayos de filosofía analítica de la historia. Barcelona: Paidós,1989.

De CERTEAU, Michel. La escritura de la historia. México: Universidad Iberoamericana, 1993.

De CERTEAU, Michel. La faiblesse de croire. Paris: Seuil, 1987.

DOMANSKA, Ewa. The material presence of the past. History and Theory, v. 45, p.337-348, 2006.

GADAMER, Hans-Georg. Verdad y Método II. Salamanca: Sígueme,1988.

GADAMER, Hans-Georg.Verdad y Método. Fundamentos de una hermenéutica filosófica. Salamanca: Sígueme, 1977.

GUMBRECHT, Hans Ulrich. Presence achieved in language (with special attention given to the presence of thepast) History and Theory, v.45, p.317-327, 2006.

GUMBRECHT. Hans Ulrich. Producción de presencia. Lo que el significado no puede transmitir. México: Universidad Iberoamericana, 2005.

HARTOG, François. Croire en l’Histoire. París: Flammarion, 2013.

HARTOG, François. Regímenes de historicidad. Presentismo y experiencias del tiempo. México: Universidad Iberoamericana, 2007.

HARTOG, François. The texture of the present. In: SIMON Zoltan Baldisar y DEILE Lars (Org). Historical Understanding. Past, present and future. London, New York, New Delhi, Sidney, Bloombsbury Academic, 2022.p. 17-24.

KLEINBERG, Ethan, Presence in Absentia, In: RANJAN Ghosh, and KLEINBERG Ethan (Org.). Presence Philosophy, History, and Cultural Theory for the Twenty-First Century. New York; Cornell University Press, 2013, 8-25. (republicado en: KLEIMBERG, Ethan, Haunting History. For a deconstructive approach to the past. Stanford University Press, California, 2017, 54-71).

KLEINBERG, Ethan. Haunting History. Deconstruction and the spirit of revision. History and Theory, v. 46, p. 113-143, 2007. (Republicado en: KLEINBERG, Ethan. Haunting History. For a deconstructive approach to the past. California: Stanford University Press, 2017, p. 13-53).

KOSELLECK, Reinhardt. Estratos del tiempo. Estudios sobre la historia. Barcelona: Paidós, 2001.

KOSELLECK, Reinhardt. Futuro pasado: Para una semántica de los tiempos históricos. Barcelona: Paidós, 1993.

KUUKKANEN, Jouni-Matti. Filosofía posnarrativista de la historiografía. Zaragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico, 2019.

KUUKKANEN, Jouni-Matti. Why we need to move from truth-functionality to performativity in historiography. History and Theory, v. 54, p. 226-243, 2015.

LEE, Peter. Historical imagination. In: DIKINSON A.K., LEE P.J. y ROGERS P.J. (Org). Learning History London: Heinemann Educational Books.1984, p. 85-116.

LORENZ, Chris.Can histories be true? Narrativism, positivism and the metaphorical turn. History and Theory, v. 37, n. 3, p. 309-329, 1998.

PIHLAINEN, Kalle. The work of History. Constructivism and a politics of the past. London: Routledge, 2017.

RICOEUR, Paul. La memoria, la historia, el olvido. Madrid: Trotta, 2003.

RICOEUR, Paul. Sí mismo como otro. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 2006.

ROTH, Paul. The pasts. History and Theory, v. 51, p. 313-339, 2012.

RUNIA, Eelco. Presence, History and Theory, v. 45, n. 1, p. 1-29, 2006a.

RUNIA, Eelco. Spots of time. History and Theory, v. 45, n. 3, p.305-316, 2006b.

SIMON, Zoltan Boldisar y DEILE, Lars. Historical understanding. Present, past and future. London, New York, New Delhi, Sidney: Bloombsbury Academic, 2022.

SIMON, Zoltan Boldisar. Disconnective futures: uncertainty, unfathomability, and the collapse of narrative crisis management. Frontiers of Narrative Studies (FNS). v. 9, n.2, p. 208-231, 2023.

STOCKLEY, David. Empathetic reconstruction in history and history teaching. History and theory, v. 22, n. 4, 50-65, 1983.

TAMM, Marek (Org) Afterlife of events. Perspectives on mnemohistory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

TAMM, Marek y OLIVIER, Laurent (Org). Rethinking historical time. New approaches to presentism. London, New York, Oxford: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019.

TUTIAUX-GUILLON, Nicole. L’histoire enseignée entre coutume disciplinaire et formation de la conscience historique : l’exemple français. En: TUTIAUX-GUILLON Nicole y NOURRISSON, Didier, Identités, mémoires, conscience historique. PU Saint-Étienne, 2003, p.27-41.

WHITE, Hayden. Metahistoria. La imaginación histórica en la Europa del siglo XIX. México: FCE, 1998.

WHITE, Hayden. The question of narrative in contemporary historical theory. History and theory, v. 23, n. 1, 1-33, 1984.

ZAVALA, Ana, et al… Aulas de história em foco. Ensinar, pesquisar, analisar. Edufba, 2024, p. 235-269.

ZELENĂK, Eugen. Two versions of a constructivist view of historical work. History and Theory, v. 54, p. 209-225, 2015.

Published

2025-09-22

How to Cite

Zavala, A. (2025). Didactics and philosophy of history in the 21st century: new challenges for thinking about history teaching. Perspectiva, 43(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2025.e105053

Issue

Section

Dossiê Ensino de História na encruzilhada: ontologia, epistemes e epistemologias