Domestication and foreignization in two English translations of A paixão segundo G. H., by Clarice Lispector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7968.2017v37n1p90Abstract
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7968.2017v37n1p90
This article aims to compare the English translation realized by Ronald W. Sousa (LISPECTOR, 2010) with the retranslation by Idra Novey (LISPECTOR, 2012) of A Paixão Segundo G.H., by Clarice Lispector, published in the United States, in order to quantitatively verify Berman’s so called “retranslation hypothesis” (1990), whereby the first translation of a literary work is more ethnocentric than the retranslations. Therefore, we use Francis H. Aubert’s (1998) Modalities of Translation Method (MMT), derived from Jean-Paul Vinay and Jean Darbelnet’s technical procedures published in 1958 (1995). The theoretical framework presents some ideas on retranslation, from the 1990s to the present, and Venuti’s (1992, 1995) concepts of domestication and foreignization, taking into account their ethical implications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors hold the copyright and grant the journal the right for their articles' first publication, being their works simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which allows the sharing of such works with its authorship acknowledged and its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or as a book chapter, with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal).