Políticas editoriais de compartilhamento de dados em periódicos brasileiros de ciências sociais aplicadas na coleção SciELO

Carolina Dias

doi:10.5007/1518-2924.2024.e95038

Authors

Carolina Dias Federal University of Rio de Janeiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0478-8777

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2024.e95038

Keywords:

Scholarly journals, Editorial policies, Open science, Data sharing, Social sciences

Abstract

Purpose of study: Considering the growing importance of open science and the role of journals in disseminating its practices, this study aims to investigate and characterize the data-sharing editorial policies of Brazilian social science scholarly journals listed in the SciELO collection.

Methods: This quantitative research performs a descriptive cross-sectional study of the data-sharing editorial policies of a sample of 47 Brazilian journals from Applied Social Sciences included in the SciELO collection in 2022. The method consists of the thematic content analysis of the editorial policies of the publications extracted from the electronic page of each publication in the sample. Eighteen variables are analyzed, 11 referring to the characteristics of the journals and seven related to the features of the policies.

Results: The results show that 34% of the titles in the sample have some data sharing policy and, among these, 62.5% have optional policies; 68.7% indicate a repository for data deposit, especially SciELO Data and Zenodo. Where existent, the observed policies are often incomplete or silent regarding the types of data and formats accepted for sharing.

Conclusions: The results align with those of the international empirical literature, which point to the lower frequency of data-sharing policies and the prevalence of optional policies in social science journals. New studies are needed to investigate better the correlations between attributes of Brazilian journals and characteristics of existing policies and to monitor the dissemination and maturation of editorial policies for these publications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carolina Dias, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Mestre em Comunicação pela Escola de Comunicação da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Estudante de doutorado do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação do Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia e Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Editora-Gerente da Revista de Economia Contemporânea do Instituto de Economia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Gerente de Projetos do Grupo de Indústria e Competitividade do Instituto de Economia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

References

ALBAGLI, S. Ciência Aberta: movimento de movimentos. In: SHINTAKU, M.; SALES, L. F. (Orgs.) Ciência aberta para editores científicos. Botucatu, SP: ABEC, 2019. p. 15-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21452/978-85-93910-02-9.cap2. Disponível em: https://www.abecbrasil.org.br/arquivos/Ciencia_aberta_editores_cientificos_Ebook.pdf#capitulo02. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

ALBAGLI, S.; CLINIO, A. RAYCHTOCK, S. Ciência Aberta: correntes interpretativas e tipos de ação. Liinc em Revista, Rio de Janeiro, v. 10, n. 2, p. 434-450, nov. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v10i2.749. Disponível em: https://revista.ibict.br/liinc/article/view/3593. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

ALEIXANDRE-BENAVENT, R. et al.. Correlation between impact factor and public availability of published research data in Information Science and Library Science journals. Scientometrics, Budapest, v. 107, p. 1-13, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1868-7. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-016-1868-7. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

BABINI, D.; ROVELLI, L. Tendencias recientes en las políticas científicas de ciencia abierta y acceso abierto en Iberoamérica. Buenos Aires: CLACSO; Fundación Carolina, 2020.

BASTOS, J. L. D.; DUQUIA, R. P. Um dos delineamentos mais empregados em epidemiologia: estudo transversal. Scientia Medica, Porto Alegre, v. 17, n. 4, p. 229-232, out./dez. 2007.

BEIGEL, F. (Re)Opening the Social Sciences: the challenges of open science. Global Dialogue, v. 13, n. 1, 2023. Disponível em: https://globaldialogue.isa-sociology.org/articles/reopening-the-social-sciences-the-challenges-of-open-science. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

BERKOWITZ, H.; DELACOUR, H. Opening research data: what does it mean for Social Sciences? M@n@gement, [S. l.], v. 25, n. 4, p. 1-15, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.v25.9123. Disponível em: https://management-aims.com/index.php/mgmt/article/view/9123. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

BEZJAK, S. et al.. The Open Science Training Handbook (1.0) [Computer software]. Zenodo, 2018. Disponível em: https://zenodo.org/record/1212496. Acesso em: 13 mai. 2023.

BLAHOUS, B. et al.. Data policies in journals under scrutiny: their strength, scope and impact. Bibliometrie: Praxis und Forschung, [S. l.], v. 5, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5283/BPF.269. Disponível em: https://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/view/269. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

BRYMAN, A. Social research methods. 4. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

CASTRO, E. et al. Evaluating and promoting open data practices in open access journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, Toronto, v. 49, n. 1, p. 66-88, 2017. Disponível em: https://open.bu.edu/handle/2144/24792. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

CHRISTIAN, T.-M. et al.. Journal data policies: Exploring how the understanding of editors and authors corresponds to the policies themselves. PLoS ONE, São Francisco, v. 15, n. 3, e0230281, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230281. Disponível em: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230281. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

CHRISTENSEN, G. et al. Open Science practices are on the rise: the state of Social Science (3S) Survey. Working Paper Series No. WPS-106, Center for Effective Global Action, University of California, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5rksu. Disponível em: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/5rksu/. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

CURRIER, B.; BUTLER, C.; LILLARD, K. Safeguarding research: a review of Economics journals’ preservation policies for published code and data files. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Working Paper No. 21-14, Dec. 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3977279. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3977279. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

CURVALE, C.; PÉREZ-ARROBO, G. Documentation Requirements in Political Science Journals: Moving Towards Open Access Practices. Revista de Ciencia Política, Santiago, v. 41, n. 3, p. 477-495, 2021. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2021005000108 . Disponível em: https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-090X2021005000108&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

DIGITAL SCIENCE et al.. The State of Open Data 2022: The longest-running longitudinal survey and analysis on open data. [S. l.: s. n.], 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21276984.v5. Disponível em: https://digitalscience.figshare.com/articles/report/The_State_of_Open_Data_2022/21276984/5. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

DOSCH, B.; MARTINDALE, T. Reading the fine print: A review and analysis of business journals’ data sharing policies. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, Londres, v. 25, n. 3-4, p. 261-280, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2020.1847549. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08963568.2020.1847549. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

DUNLEAVY, P. Three false starts on the road to open social science. Blog LSE, June 27, 2022. Disponível em: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/06/27/three-false-starts-on-the-road-to-open-social-science/. Acesso em: 13 mai. 2023.

FEENEY, J. Robust science: a review of journal practices in Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Washington, v. 11, n. 1, p. 48-54, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2017.84. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology/article/robust-science-a-review-of-journal-practices-in-industrialorganizational-psychology/604E5761420648017CBC92A0A353D9E2. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

GALVÃO, T. F.; SILVA, M. T.; GARCIA, L. P. Ferramentas para melhorar a qualidade e a transparência dos relatos de pesquisa em saúde: guias de redação científica. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde: revista do SUS, Brasília, v. 25, n. 2, p. 427-436, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742016000200022. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/ress/a/F9fKy5PYP7TyvPMYJ6cjqNN/abstract/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

HRYNASZKIEWICZ, I. Publishers’ responsibilities in promoting data quality and reproducibility. In: BESPALOV, A.; MICHEL, M. C.; STECKLER, T. (ed.) Good research practice in non-clinical pharmacology and biomedicine. [S. l.]: Springer Cham, 2019. (Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. 257.). E-book. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2019_290. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/164_2019_290. Aceso em 13 maio 2023.

HRYNASZKIEWICZ, I. et al. Standardising and harmonising research data policy in scholarly publishing. International Journal of Digital Curation, Edimburgo, v. 12, n. 1, p. 65-71, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v12i1.531. Disponível em: http://www.ijdc.net/article/view/12.1.65. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

HRYNASZKIEWICZ, I. et al. Developing a research data policy framework for all journals and publishers. Data Science Journal, Paris, v. 19, n. 5, p.?1-15, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-005. Disponível em: https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2020-005. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

IKEUCHI, U. An analysis of open research data practice, drivers, and barriers in Japan. Library and Information Science, [S. l.], v. 79, p. 21-57, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46895/lis.79.21. Disponível em: http://www.libinformsci.com/10.46895/lis.79.21/. Acesso 13 maio 2023.

JACKSON, B. Open Data Policies among Library and Information Science Journals. Publications, [S. l.], v. 25, n. 9, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9020025. Disponível em: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/9/2/25. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

JEONG, G. H. Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science. Science Editing, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 136-141, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.208. Disponível em: https://www.escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.6087/kcse.208. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

KIM, J.; BAI, S. Y. Status and factors associated with the adoption of data sharing policies in Asian journals. Science Editing, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 2, p. 97-104, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.274. Dipsonível em: https://www.escienceediting.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.6087/kcse.274. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

KLEBEL, T. et al. Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals. PLoS ONE, São Francisco, v. 15, n. 10, e0239518, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239518. Disponível em: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239518. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

LAAKSO, M. Open Science and open access publishing in Social Sciences. In: ENGELS, T.; KULCZYCKI, E. (ed.) Handbook on Research Assessment in the Social Sciences. London: Edward Elgar, 2022. p. 105-118. Disponível em: https://harisportal.hanken.fi/en/publications/open-science-and-open-access-publishing-in-social-sciences. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

LEE, Y. J.; CHUNG, E. Mapping open science using a keyword bibliographic coupling analysis network. Information Research, [S. l.], v. 27, n. 4, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper949. Disponível em: https://informationr.net/ir/27-4/paper949.html. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

MALI?KI, M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017. Nature Communications, Londres, v. 12, 5840, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26027-y. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-26027-y. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

MALI?KI, M. et al.. Journals’ instructions to authors: A cross-sectional study across scientific disciplines. PLoS ONE, São Francisco, v. 14, n. 9, e0222157, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222157. Disponível em: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0222157. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

MIGUEL, E. Evidence on research transparency in Economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Pittsburgh, v. 35, n. 3, p. 193-214, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27041221. Acesso em: 13 mai. 2023.

MOLES, N. Data-PE: A framework for evaluating data publication policies at scholarly journals. Data Science Journal, v. 13, p. 192-202, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.14-047 . Disponível em: https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.2481/dsj.14-047. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

NAUGHTON, L.; KERNOHAN, D, Making sense of journal research data policies. Insights, Londres, v. 29, n. 1, p. 84-89, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1629/uksg.284. Disponível em: https://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.284. Acesso em: 13 maio 2203.

NOSEK, B. A. et al. Promoting an open research culture: Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility. Science, Washington, v. 348, n. 6242, p. 1422-1425, June 26, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374. Disponível em: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aab2374. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

OPEN KNOWLEDGE FOUNDATION (OKF). Updating the Open Definition to meet the challenges of today. Blog OKF, 16 mar. 2023. Disponível em: https://blog.okfn.org/2023/03/16/updating-the-open-definition-to-meet-the-challenges-of-today/. Acesso em: 13 mai. 2023.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Making Open Science a Reality. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, n. 25. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015a. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en. Disponível em: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/making-open-science-a-reality_5jrs2f963zs1-en. Acesso em:13 maio 2023.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Data-driven innovation for growth and well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015b. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/sti/data-driven-innovation-9789264229358-en.htm. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO, A CIÊNCIA E A CULTURA (UNESCO). Recomendação da UNESCO sobre Ciência Aberta. Brasília: UNESCO Office Brasília, 2022. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949_por. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2022.

PACKER, A. A eclosão dos periódicos do Brasil e cenários para o seu porvir. Educação e Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 40, n. 2, jun. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022014061860. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/ep/a/RGBqtc7ZPMRFJSYLB37SXTp/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

PERSIC, A. et al. The time for open science is now. In: SCHNEEGANS, S.; STRAZA, T.; LEWIS, J. (eds). UNESCO Science Report: the race against time for smarter development. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2021, p. 12-16. Disponível em: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377447. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

PIWOWAR, H.; CHAPMAN, W, A review of journal policies for sharing research data. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING (ELPUB), 12., 25-27 jun. 2008, Toronto. Proceedings […], Toronto, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221436022_A_review_of_journal_policies_for_sharing_research_data. Acesso em: 13 mai. 2023.

PONTIKA, N. et al. Fostering Open Science to Research using a Taxonomy and an eLearning Portal. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE TECHNOLOGIES AND DATA DRIVEN BUSINESS, 15, Oct. 2015, Graz Austria. Proceedings […]. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809571. Disponível em: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2809563.2809571. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

PROSSER, A. M. B. et al. When open data closes the door: A critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals. British Journal of Social Psychology, [S. l.], p.1-19, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12576. Disponível em: https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjso.12576. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

RESNIK, D. B. et al. Effect of impact factor and discipline on journal data sharing policies. Accountability in Research, Londres, v. 26, n. 3, p. 139-156, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1591277. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2019.1591277. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

RODES, S. M.; SALES, D. P.; ALVES, M. S. Política editorial de um periódico científico. In: RODE, S. M.; PRINCIPE, E. (org.). Comunicação científica aberta. Rio de Janeiro: IBICT, 2022. pp. 159-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21452/ABEC.2022.isbn.978-65-89167-68-6. Disponível em: https://www.abecbrasil.org.br/painel/uploads/www/geral/E-book-Comunicacao-cientifica-aberta.pdf. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

RODRIGUES, R. S.; NEUBERT, P. S.; HERMES DE ARAÚJO, B. K. Publicações de autores brasileiros: acesso, publishers e dispersão. Em Questão, Porto Alegre, v. 26, n. 2, p. 13–31, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245262.13-31. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/97431. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

RODRIGUES, R. S.; OLIVEIRA, A. B. Periódicos científicos na América Latina: títulos em Acesso Aberto indexados no ISI e SCOPUS. Perspectivas em Ciências da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v. 17, n. 4, dez. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362012000400006. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/pci/a/P4GSxYP4sL4XHdchpNmzXLL/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

SALES, L. F.; SAYÃO, L. F. Uma proposta de taxonomia para dados de pesquisa. Conhecimento em Ação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 4, n. 1, jan/jun. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47681/rca.v4i1.26337. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rca/article/view/26337. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

SANTOS, L. L. S.; RODRIGUES, R. S.; NEUBERT, P. S. A publicação científica brasileira e chinesa indexada na Web of Science: análise da área de Ciência da Informação. Transinformação, Campinas, v. 35, e227169, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202335e227169. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/tinf/a/mwYFrMFSyksG5RsJzD85MpM/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

SAYÃO, L. F.; SALES, L. F. Dados abertos de pesquisa: ampliando o conceito de acesso livre. In: SALES, L. F.; VIOLA, C. M. M. Informação digital e suas diversas abordagens pela ótica de um cientista da informação. Rio de Janeiro: IBICT, 2021a, p. 185-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22477/9786589167136. Disponível em: https://ridi.ibict.br/handle/123456789/1186. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

SAYÃO, L. F.; SALES, L. F. Gestão de dados como serviço: proposta de um modelo. In: SALES, L. F.; VIOLA, C. M. M. Informação digital e suas diversas abordagens pela ótica de um cientista da informação. Rio de Janeiro: IBICT, 2021b, p. 285-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22477/9786589167136. Disponível em: https://ridi.ibict.br/handle/123456789/1186. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

SCHÖPFEL, J.; KERGOSIEN, E. Les revues SIC et les données de recherche. Balisages, [S. l.], v. 3, dec. 2021. Disponível em: https://publications-prairial.fr/balisages/index.php?id=641. Acesso 23 abr. 2023.

SHMAGUN, H. et al..The Uptake of Open Science: Mapping the Results of a Systematic Literature Review. ITM Web Conf., [S. l.], v. 33, 01001, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20203301001. Disponível em: https://www.itm-conferences.org/articles/itmconf/abs/2020/03/itmconf_ictessh2020_01001/itmconf_ictessh2020_01001.html. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

STUART, D. et al.. Whitepaper: Practical challenges for researchers in data sharing. [S. l.]: Springer Nature, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5975011. Disponível em: https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Whitepaper_Practical_challenges_for_researchers_in_data_sharing/5975011. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

STURGES, P. et al.. Research Data Sharing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, [S. l.], v. 66, n. 12, p. 2445-2455, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23336. Disponível em: https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23336. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

SWANSON, N. et al.. Research transparency is on the rise in Economics. AEA Papers and Proceedings, Washington, v. 110, p. 61-65, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201077. Disponível em: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pandp.20201077. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

TEDERSOO, L. et al.. Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines. Scientific Data, Londres, v. 8, n. 192, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-021-00981-0. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

THE ROYAL SOCIETY. Science as an open enterprise. The Royal Society Science Policy Centre Report 02/12. London: The Royal Society, 2012. Disponível em: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-saoe.pdf. Acesso em: 13 mai. 2023.

VICENTE-SAEZ, R.; MARTINEZ-FUENTES, C. Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, [S. l.], v. 88, p. 428-436, Jun. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296317305441?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

VLAEMINCK, S. Data Management in Scholarly Journals and Possible Roles for Libraries — Some Insights from EDaWaX. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, The Hague, v. 23, n. 1, p. 48-79, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8082. Disponível em: https://liberquarterly.eu/article/view/10647. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

VLAEMINCK, S. Dawning of a new age? Economics journals’ data policies on the test bench. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, The Hague, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1-29, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.10940. Disponível em: https://liberquarterly.eu/article/view/10940. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

VLAEMINCK, S.; HERRRMANN, L-K. Data policies and data archives: a new paradigm for academic publishing in Economic Sciences? In: SCHMIDT, B.; Dobreva, M. (ed.). New Avenues for Electronic Publishing in the Age of Infinite Collections and Citizen Science. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2015. E-book. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-562-3-145. Disponível em: https://ebooks.iospress.nl/publication/40893. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

WILKINSON, M. et al.. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, Londres, 160018, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

ZANGIROLAMI-RAIMUNDO, J.; ECHEIMBERG, J. O.; LEONE, C. Research methodology topics: Cross-sectional studies. Journal of Human Growth and Development, Marília, v. 28, n. 3, p. 356-360, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.152198. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jhgd/article/view/152198. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

ZENK-MÖLTGEN, W.; LEPTHIEN, G. Data sharing in sociology journals. Online Information Review, [S. l.], v. 38, n. 6, p. 709-722, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2014-0119. Disponível em: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/83734/ssoar-oir-2014-6-zenk-moltgen_et_al-Data_sharing_in_sociology_journals.pdf;jsessionid=063DA5C0A8D6351189700EBB1A581F15?sequence=1 . Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.

ZENK-MÖLTGEN, W. et al.. Factors influencing the data sharing behavior of researchers in sociology and political science. Journal of Documentation, [S. l.], v. 74, n. 5, p. 1053-1073, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2017-0126. Disponível em: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-09-2017-0126/full/html. Acesso em: 13 maio 2023.