Reading reports as a practice for comprehension and reflection in higher education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2025.e105010Keywords:
Reading report, Reading strategies, Higher educationAbstract
To actively participate in the academic sphere, it is essential to engage in language practices involving texts and discourses characteristic of this domain. In this context, reading emerges as a vital practice for constructing knowledge of various types, requiring explicit and systematic instruction to enable students to learn how to read within the context of higher education. This scenario becomes even more complex when we consider students who have recently graduated from high school, particularly in the post-physical distancing context resulting from the global Covid-19 pandemic. Many of these students did not have the opportunity to engage in in-person reading activities during high school. In this context, this article aims to reflect on the potential of reading summaries as a practice for the comprehension and critical reflection of theoretical texts in higher education. To this end, reports created by students from different semesters of a Language and Literature program at a university in the interior of Santa Catarina, Brazil, are analyzed. The students, after receiving guidance on reading strategies, specifically on the construction of reading summaries, prepared their reports as a study tool for various courses within the program. The analyses, grounded in psycholinguistic theories, indicate that reading reports serve as a tool for dialogue between the text and the reader’s prior knowledge, as well as a space for reflections, questions, and the triangulation of knowledge, fostering reading comprehension. Furthermore, explicit and systematic instruction in this form of documentation is considered to contribute to students' learning and autonomy within the higher education context.
References
AFFLERBACH; Peter; PEARSON; P. David; PARIS, Scott G. Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, n. 61, v. 5, 2008, p. 364– 373.
BAKHTIN, Mikhail. Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem: problemas fundamentais do método sociológico na ciência da linguagem. 12. ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2012, 203p.
BECK, Isabel.; PERFETTI, Charles.; MCKEOWN, Margaret G. Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 74, n. 4, p. 506-521, 1982.
DEHAENE, Stanislas. Os neurônios da leitura: como a ciência explica a nossa capacidade de ler. Tradução: Leonor Scliar-Cabral. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2012, 374p.
FANG, Zhihui. Scientific Literacy: a systemic functional linguistics perspective. Wiley Periodicals, p. 335-347, 2004.
FLICK, Uwe. Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa. Tradução de Joice Elias Costa. 3 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009, 405p.
GAGNÉ, Ellen. D.; YEKOVICH, Carol Walker.; YEKOVICH, Frank. R. Reading. In: GAGNÉ, Ellen. D.; YEKOVICH, Carol Walker.; YEKOVICH, Frank. R (org.). The cognitive psychology of school learning, 1993, p. 267-313.
GEE, J. P. La ideología en los discursos: Lingüística social y alfabetizaciones (P. Manzano, Trad.). Madri: Ediciones Morata, 2005, 232p.
GRAY, David E. Pesquisa no mundo real. Tradução de Roberto Cataldo Costa. 2 ed. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2012, 488p.
HEINIG, Otilia Lizete de Oliveira Martins. O papel do professor no processo da construção de sentido na leitura. In: p. SOUZA, Ana Cláudia de.; SEMEITZ-RODRIGUES, Cristiane.; FINGER-KRATOCHVIL, Cláudia.; BARETTA, Luciane.; BACK, Angela Cristina di Palma. (orgs). Diálogos linguísticos para a leitura e a escrita. Florianópolis: Insular, p. 107-129.
JENNINGS, Joyce Holt; CALDWELL, Joanne Schudt; LERNER, Janet W. Reading Problems: assessment and teaching strategies. 7 ed. Boston: Pearson, 2014.
KINTSCH, Walter. Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 480p.
KINTSCH, Walter; RAWSON, Katherine A. Compreensão. In: SNOWLING, Margaret J.; HULME, Charles. (Org.). A ciência da leitura. Tradução de Ronaldo Cataldo Costa. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2013. p. 227-244.
KLEIMAN, Angela. Texto e leitor: aspectos cognitivos da leitura. 12 ed. Campinas, SP: Pontes, 2009, 82p.
LESLIE, Lauren; CALDWELL, Joanne. Formal and Informal Measures of Reading Comprehension. In: ISRAEL, Susan E., DUFFY, GERALD G. Handbook of research on reading comprehension. New York: Routledge, 2011, p.403-427.
MINGUELA, Marta;SOLÉ, Isabel; PIESCHL, Stephanie. Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: Evidence from online and offline measures. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(5), 721–744, 2015.
OAKHILL, Jane; CAIN, Kate; ELBRO, Carsten. Compreensão de leitura: teoria e prática. Tradução e Adaptação de Adair Sobral. São Paulo: Hogrefe, 2017, 183p.
PERFETTI, Charles.; LANDI, Nicole.; OAKHILL, Jane. A aquisição da habilidade de compreensão da leitura. In: SNOWLING, Margaret J.; HULME, Charles. (org.). A ciência da leitura. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2013, p. 245-265.
SOLÉ, Isabel. Estratégias de leitura. 6.ed. Tradução de Cláudia Schilling. Porto Alegre: ARTMED, 1998, 194p.
SCHLICHTING, Thais de Souza. Compreensão leitora e linguagem técnica no Ensino Superior: um diálogo entre Psicolinguística e Engenharia. Tese (Programa de Pós-graduação em Linguística). Florianópolis: UFSC, 2021.
SHANAHAN, Cynthia. Disciplinary Comprehension. In: ISRAEL, Susan E., DUFFY, GERALD G. Handbook of research on reading comprehension. New York: Routledge, 2011, p.403-427.
SIDEK, Harison Mohd.; RAHIM, H. Ab. The role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension: a cross-linguistic study. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, n. 197, p. 50-56, 2015.
SOUZA, Ana Cláudia de Souza; SEIMETZ-RODRIGUES, Cristiane; WEIRICH, Helena Cristina. Ensinar a estudar ensinando a ler: potências dos roteiros de leitura. In: SOUZA, Ana Cláudia de. et al (org.) Diálogos linguísticos para a leitura e a escrita. Florianópolis: Insular, 2019, pp. 164-200
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thais de Souza Schlichting, Otilia Lizete de Oliveira Martins, Bruna Alexandra Franzen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides open access to all of it content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, which has designed this system to improve the scholarly and public quality of research, and which freely distributes the journal system as well as other software to support the open access publishing of scholarly resources. The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
The Perspectiva allow the author(s) yo hold the copyright without restrictions as well as publishing rights. If the paper will be republished later in another format, the author(s) should inform that it has originally been published as article in Perspectiva Journal and quote the complete references.
