Assessment of Graduate Programs:the standpoint of the Coordinators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/%25xAbstract
Criticisms and suggestions provided to CAPES (The National Council for the Improvement of Higher Education) by
the coordinators of Graduate Programs,from all fields, in the computer program “Coleta CAPES / 2004”, were the
primary source for this article. The information collected was divided into five groups: criticisms of the homogenizing nature of the model; criticisms of the emphasis on quantity and productivity; criticisms of the absence of indicators for social indicators for the Programs’ activities and proposals
to introduce these indicators; international insertion and consequences of the assessment. In each of the
groups, these criticisms and suggestions were exemplified and compared with previous studies about the same subject
and with official documents from CAPES.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides open access to all of it content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, which has designed this system to improve the scholarly and public quality of research, and which freely distributes the journal system as well as other software to support the open access publishing of scholarly resources. The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
The Perspectiva allow the author(s) yo hold the copyright without restrictions as well as publishing rights. If the paper will be republished later in another format, the author(s) should inform that it has originally been published as article in Perspectiva Journal and quote the complete references.
