Latin American women in Southern Europe: an intersectional analysis of migrations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2022v30n379337Keywords:
Women’s migrations, Intersectionality, Coloniality, Latin America/Europe, Multiple correspondence analysisAbstract
This article compares the trajectories of Brazilian and Colombian migrant women in the Iberian Peninsula. Our objective is to show the ways in which the structures of gender, race and class
organize the migratory processes of these women, in order to anchor intersectionality and make it legible in their bodies. We point to the postcolonial sociopolitical context as a generative and interpretative framework of the conditions that have made Colombian and Brazilian women appear as main actresses of migratory processes in Spain and Portugal, respectively. Through the use of
the multiple correspondence analysis technique, we explain the way in which different situations/categories permeate the life experiences of these migrant women in their movements along the transnational social space.
Downloads
References
AGUSTÍN, Laura. “Mujeres inmigrantes ocupadas en la industria del sexo”. Mujer, inmigración y trabajo, Colectivo IOÉ (Ed.), Madrid: IMSERSO, 2001. p. 647-716.
ANTHIAS, Floya. “Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and level of analysis”.
Ethnicities, London, v. 13, n. 1, p. 3-19, 2012.
BACCHETTA, Paola; MAIRA, Sunaina; WINANT, Howard (Eds.) Global raciality. Empire, Postcoloniality, Decoloniality. Center for New Racial Studies. New York: Routledge, 2019.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. “Le mort sassit le vif”. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, Paris, v. 32-33, n. 1, p. 3-14, 1980.
BRAGA, Amanda. “Between gentlemen, sambas and beers: the discoursive construction of the
‘easy mulatto woman’ in Brazil”. Revista Brasileira de Estudos da Presença, Porto Alegre, v. 7, n. 2, p. 333-358, 2017.
CORDERO, Blanca; MEZZADRA, Sandro; VARELA, Amarela. (Coords.) América Latina en movimiento. Migraciones, límites a la movilidad y sus desbordamientos, Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños, 2019.
EHRENREICH, Barbara; RUSSELL HOCHSCHILD, Arlie. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex
Workers in the New Economy. London: Granta books, 2003.
FEDERICI, Silvia. Revolución en punto cero: trabajo doméstico, reproducción y luchas feministas. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños, 2013.
FELDMAN-BIANCO, Bela. “Brazilians in Portugal, Portuguese in Brazil: Constructions of sameness and Difference”. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, London, v. 8, n. 4, p. 607-650, 2001.
FRANÇA, Thais; PADILLA, Beatriz. “Imigração brasileira para Portugal: entre o surgimento e a
construção mediática de uma nova vaga”. Cadernos de Estúdios Sociais, Recife, v. 33, n. 2, p.
-237, 2018.
GREGORIO, Carmen. “Trabajando honestamente en casa de familia: entre la domesticidad y la
hípersexualización”. Revista Estudos Feministas, Florianópolis, v. 15, n. 3, p. 699-716, 2007.
GROSFOGUEL, Ramón. “Las migraciones coloniales del Caribe a Estados Unidos y Europa
Occidental: colonialidades diferenciadas en cuatro centros del sistema-mundo”. Kamchatka,
Revista de Análisis Cultural, Valencia, n. 9, p. 225-250, 2017.
GUTIÉRREZ-RODRÍGUEZ, Encarnación. “Trabajo doméstico-trabajo afectivo: sobre
heteronormatividad y la colonialidad del trabajo en el contexto de las políticas migratorias de la UE”. Revista de Estudios Sociales, Bogotá, n. 45, p. 123-134, 2013.
HILL COLLINS, Patricia; BILGE, Selma. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity. 2016.
HURTADO SÁA, Teodora. “La producción social del mercado del sexo en España y de la ocupación d trabajadoras sexuales en España”. Revista Colombiana de Antropología, Bogotá, v. 54, n. 2, p. 35-58, 2018.
LUGONES, María. “Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System”. Hypathia, Hoboken, New Jersey, v. 22, n. 1, p. 186-209, 2008.
MALHEIROS, Jorge; PADILLA, Beatriz. “Can stigma become a resource? The mobilisation of
aesthetic–corporal capital by female immigrant entrepreneurs from Brazil”. Identities, Edinburgh, v. 22, n. 6, p. 687-705, 2015.
MALKKI, Liisa. “National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity Among Scholars and Refugees”. Cultural Anthropology, Arlington, v. 7, n. 1, p. 24-44, 1992.
McCLINTOCK, Anne. Imperial leather: race, gender and sexuality in the colonial context. New
York: Routledge, 1995.
MOROKVASIC, Mirjana. “Feminization of migrations?”. Stanovnistvo, Belgrado, v. 48, n. 2, p. 25-52, 2015.
NAGEL, Joane. Race, ethnicity and sexuality. Intimate intersections, forbidden frontiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
OSO, Laura; CATARINO, Christine. “From Sex to Gender: The Feminisation of Migration and LabourMarket Insertion in Spain and Portugal”. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, London, v. 9, n. 4, p. 625-647, 2013.
OSO, Laura; SUÁREZ-GRIMALT, Laura. “Towards a theoretical model for the study of productive and reproductive strategies in transnational families: Latin American migration and social mobility in Spain”. Journal of Family Studies, London, v. 24. n. 1, p. 41-58, 2017.
PEROSA, Graziela; DANTAS, Adriana. “A escolha da escola privada em famílias dos grupos
populares”. Educação e Pesquisa, São Paulo, v. 43, p. 987-1004, 2017.
PEROSA, Graziela; SOARES, Alessandro. “Educación superior privada: las paradojas de la
expansión educativa brasileña”. Propuesta Educativa, Buenos Aires, v. 1, n. 55, p. 15-33, 2021.
PISCITELLI, Adriana “Performing Brazilianness? Displacements from the sex market”. Etnografica, Lisboa, v. 15, n. 1, p. 5-29, 2011.
PISCITELLI, Adriana. “Interseccionalidades, categorias de articulação e experiências de migrantes brasileiras”. Sociedade e Cultura, Goiânia, v. 11, n. 2, p. 263-274, 2008.
PISCITELLI, Adriana. “Confronting corporalities: Brazilian women in the transnational sex industry”. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais, São Paulo, v. 22, n. 64, p. 17-32, 2007.
PRAVAZ, Natasha. “Performing mulata- Ness. The Politics of Cultural Authenticity and Sexuality
among Carioca Dancers”. Latin American perspectives, Los Ángeles, v. 3, n. 2, p. 113-133, 2012.
QUIJANO, Aníbal. Cuestiones y Horizontes: de la dependencia histórico-estructural a la
colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014.
SASSEN, Saskia. Contrageografías de la globalización: género y ciudadanía en los circuitos
transfronterizos. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños, 2003.
SEGATO, Rita. La crítica de la colonialidad en ocho ensayos: y una antropología por demanda.
Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros, 2015.
STOLER, Ann. “Making empire respectable: the politics of race and sexual morality in 20th-century colonial cultures”. American Ethnologist, Arlington, v. 16, n. 4, p. 634-660, 1989.
TAPIA LADINO, Marcela; GONZÁLEZ TORRALBO, Herminia. “Me voy a España a trabajar…
familias migrantes colombianas, remesas económicas y relaciones de género en un contexto
transnacional”. Chungara, Revista de Antropología Chilena, Santiago, v. 45, n. 2, p. 333-347,
VIVEROS VIGOYA, Mara. “La sexualización de la raza y la racialización de la sexualidad en el
contexto latinoamericano actual”. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Familiares, Manizales, n. 1, p. 63-81, 2009.
WADE, Peter. “Racial identity and nationalism: a theoretical view from Latin America”. Ethnic and Racial Studies, London, v. 24, n. 5, p. 845-865, 2001.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Estudos Feministas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Revista Estudos Feministas is under the Creative Commons International 4.0 Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), that allows sharing the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The license allows:
Sharing (copying and redistributing the material in any support or format) and/or adapting (remixing, transforming, and creating from the material) for any purpose, even if commercial.
The licensor cannot revoke these rights provided the terms of the license are respected. The terms are the following:
Attribution – you should give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made. This can be done in several ways without suggesting that the licensor has approved of the use.
Without additional restrictions – You cannot apply legal terms or technological measures that prevent others from doing something allowed by the license.