Rumo a um modelo de porto verde: Ajudar os portos a progredir na direção da sustentabilidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2025.e103263Palavras-chave:
Edifícios verdes, Desenvolvimento sustentável dos portos, Porto VerdeResumo
Contexto: Os ODS destacam a necessidade de tornar os modos de transporte sustentáveis. Os portos são de importância econômica relevante, mas também devem estar alinhados com a sustentabilidade. Para ajudar a resolver esse problema, os portos verdes são uma opção.
Objetivo: Esta pesquisa visa propor um modelo de avaliação para um porto verde, com indicadores e subindicadores. Um total de 10 indicadores foram mapeados na literatura com um grupo de 45 subindicadores.
Contribuição: Esta pesquisa contribui para este tema na literatura ao apresentar um conjunto de indicadores relevantes e ajudar os portos a progredir com seus objetivos relacionados à sustentabilidade.
Conclusões: Conclui-se que os indicadores mais relevantes na literatura são: Redução de emissões e esforços para garantir a Gestão de Energia; Qualidade do ar; Poluição sonora; Gestão da água; Custo e economia; Materiais, insumos e recursos; Qualidade do ambiente interno; Gestão de projetos de construção; Indicadores sociais; e Gestão de operações portuárias. Além disso, os indicadores e subindicadores foram verificados por especialistas do setor portuário e aplicados por meio de fontes documentais em portos reconhecidos internacionalmente.
Referências
AAPA. Environment Committee Homepage. 2020. URL https://www.aapa-ports.org/unifying/content.aspx?ItemNumber=20941 (accessed 8.19.20).
AAPA. Environmental Management Handbook.1998. URL https://www.aapa-ports.org/empowering/content.aspx?ItemNumber=989 (accessed 8.19.20).
Abood, K.A., 2007. Sustainable and Green Ports: Application of sustainability principles to port development and operation. Ports 2007 30 Years Shar. Ideas 1977-2007; Proc. Elev. Trienn. Int. Conf. 60. https://doi.org/10.1061/40834(238)60
Ali, H.H., Al Nsairat, S.F., 2009. Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries - Case of Jordan. Build. Environ. 44, 1053–1064.
Alyami, S.H., Rezgui, Y., Kwan, A., 2013. Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.011
Antão, P., Calderón, M., Puig, M., Michail, A., Wooldridge, C., Darbra, R.M., 2016. Identification of Occupational Health, Safety, Security (OHSS) and Environmental Performance Indicators in port areas. Saf. Sci. 85, 266–275.
ANTAQ. Estruturas e Indicadores. 2020. URL http://portal.antaq.gov.br/index.php/meio-ambiente/indice-de-desempenho-ambiental/estrutura-e-indicadores/ (accessed 8.19.20).
ANTAQ. Índice de Desempenho Ambiental. 2020. URL http://portal.antaq.gov.br/index.php/meio-ambiente/indice-de-desempenho-ambiental/ (accessed 8.19.20).
Boca Santa, S.L., Ribeiro, J.M.P., Mazon, G., Schneider, J., Barcelos, R.L., Guerra, J.B.S.O. de A., 2020. A Green Airport model: Proposition based on social and environmental management systems. Sustain. Cities Soc. 59, 102160.
Carić, H., Klobučar, G., Štambuk, A., 2016. Ecotoxicological risk assessment of antifouling emissions in a cruise ship port. J. Clean. Prod. 121, 159–168.
Cerceau, J., Mat, N., Junqua, G., Lin, L., Laforest, V., Gonzalez, C., 2014. Implementing industrial ecology in port cities: International overview of case studies and cross-case analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 74, 1–16.
Chang, Y.T., 2013. Environmental efficiency of ports: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach. Marit. Policy Manag. 40, 467–478.
Chen, X., Yang, H., Lu, L. 2015. A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1425-1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.003
Chen, Z., Pak, M., 2017. A Delphi analysis on green performance evaluation indices for ports in China. Marit. Policy Manag. 44, 537–550.
Chi, B., Lu, W., Ye, M., Bao, Z., Zhang, X., 2020. Construction waste minimization in green building: A comparative analysis of LEED-NC 2009 certified projects in the US and China. J. Clean. Prod. 256, 120749.
Chin, T.A., Tat, H.H., Sulaiman, Z., 2015. Green supply chain management, environmental collaboration and sustainability performance, in: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp. 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.035
Chiu, R.H., Lin, L.H., Ting, S.C., 2014. Evaluation of green port factors and performance: A fuzzy AHP analysis. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014.
Comtois, C., Slack, B. 2007. Restructuring the Maritime Transportation Industry: Global Overview of Sustainable Development Practices. URL https://trid.trb.org/view/863068 (accessed 8.19.20).
D’Amico, G., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Dembińska, I., & Ioppolo, G. (2021). Smart and sustainable logistics of Port cities: A framework for comprehending enabling factors, domains and goals. Sustainable Cities And Society, 69, 102801. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102801
Dam, L., Petkova, B.N., 2014. The impact of environmental supply chain sustainability programs on shareholder wealth. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 34, 586–609.
Darby, L., Jenkins, H., 2006. Applying sustainability indicators to the social enterprise business model: The development and application of an indicator set for Newport Wastesavers, Wales. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 33, 411–431.
Ding, Zhikun et al., 2018. Green building evaluation system implementation. Building And Environment, [s.l.], v. 133, p.32-40. Elsevier BV.
Doan, D. T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Zhang, T., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Tookey, J. 2017. A critical comparison of green building rating systems. Building and Environment, 123, 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.007
ESPO, 2012. ESPO Green Guide: Towards Excellence in Port Environmental Management and Sustainability. URL. https://www.espo.be/media/espopublications/espo_green%20guide_october%202012_final.pdf (accessed 8.19.20).
ESPO, 2016. ESPO / EcoPorts Port Environmental Review 2016. https://www.espo.be/media/news/ESPO_EcoPorts%20Port%20Environmental%20Review%202016.pdf (accessed 8.19.20)
Ha, M.H., Yang, Z., 2017. Comparative analysis of port performance indicators: Independency and interdependency. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 103, 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.013
Halme, 2006. CBL I Sustainable consumer services: Putting happiness to the picture. Sustain. Consum. Prod. Oppor. Challenges 23–55.
Hou, L., Geerlings, H., 2016. Dynamics in sustainable port and hinterland operations: A conceptual framework and simulation of sustainability measures and their effectiveness, based on an application to the Port of Shanghai. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.134
Housni, F., Boumane, A., Rasmussen, B., Britel, M., Barnes, P., & Abdelfettah, S. et al. (2022). Environmental sustainability maturity system: An integrated system scale to assist maritime port managers in addressing environmental sustainability goals. Environmental Challenges, 7, 100481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100481
Hua, C., Chen, J., Wan, Z., Xu, L., Bai, Y., Zheng, T., Fei, Y., 2020. Evaluation and governance of green development practice of port: A sea port case of China. J. Clean. Prod. 249, 119434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119434
Huo, X., Yu, A.T.W., Wu, Z., 2017. A comparative analysis of site planning and design among green building rating tools. J. Clean. Prod. 147, 352–359.
Kong, Y., & Liu, J., 2021. Sustainable port cities with coupling coordination and environmental efficiency. Ocean &Amp; Coastal Management, 205, 105534. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105534
Lam, J.S.L., Notteboom, T., 2014. The Greening of Ports: A Comparison of Port Management Tools Used by Leading Ports in Asia and Europe. Transp. Rev.
Le, X.Q., Vu, V.H., Hens, L., Van Heur, B., 2014. Stakeholder perceptions and involvement in the implementation of EMS in ports in Vietnam and Cambodia. J. Clean. Prod. 64, 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.032
Lee, J., Edil, T. B., Benson, C. H., Tinjum, J. M. 2013. Building environmentally and economically sustainable transportation infrastructure: green highway rating system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139, A4013006. 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000742.
Lee, T., Nam, H., 2017. A Study on Green Shipping in Major Countries: In the View of Shipyards, Shipping Companies, Ports, and Policies. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 33, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.12.009
Lee, W.L., Burnett, J., 2008. Benchmarking energy use assessment of HK-BEAM, BREEAM and LEED. Build. Environ. 43, 1882–1891.
Li, Y., Chen, X., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Chen, P. H. 2017. A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis. Energy and Buildings, 146, 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.076
Lim, S., Pettit, S., Abouarghoub, W., Beresford, A., 2019. Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 72, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.009
Liu, J., Kong, Y., Li, S., & Wu, J., 2021. Sustainability assessment of port cities with a hybrid model-empirical evidence from China. Sustainable Cities And Society, 75, 103301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103301
Mat, N., Cerceau, J., Lopez-Ferber, M., Junqua, G., 2017. Complexity as a means of resilience in metropolitan port areas: Application to the Aix-Marseille case study in France. J. Clean. Prod. 145, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.077
Mattoni, B., Guattari, C., Evangelisti, L., Bisegna, F., Gori, P., Asdrubali, F. 2018. Critical review and methodological approach to evaluate the differences among international green building rating tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 950-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.105
Mazon, G., Berchin, I., Soares, T., Guerra, J. B., 2019. Importance of Sustainability Indicators. In: Leal Filho W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer, Cham.
Ng, A.K.Y., Song, S., 2010. The environmental impacts of pollutants generated by routine shipping operations on ports. Ocean Coast. Manag. 53, 301–311.
Nilashi, M., Zakaria, R., Ibrahim, O., Majid, M.Z.A., Mohamad Zin, R., Chugtai, M.W., Zainal Abidin, N.I., Sahamir, S.R., Aminu Yakubu, D., 2015. A knowledge-based expert system for assessing the performance level of green buildings. Knowledge-Based Syst. 86, 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.009
Parola, F., Satta, G., Notteboom, T., & Persico, L. (2020). Revisiting traffic forecasting by port authorities in the context of port planning and development. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 23(3), 444-494. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00170-7
Pavlic, B., Cepak, F., Sucic, B., Peckaj, M., Kandus, B., 2014. Sustainable port infrastructure, practical implementation of the green port concept. Therm. Sci. 18, 935–948. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI1403935P
Pfitscher, E. D. Avaliação de Sustentabilidade: Evolução de um sistema de gestão ambiental. Curitiba: Appris, 2014.
PIANC. Sustainable Ports: A Guidance for Port Authorities. 2014. URL https://sustainableworldports.org/wp-content/uploads/EnviCom-WG-150-FINAL-VERSION.pdf (accessed 8.19.20).
Pilouk, S., Koottatep, T., 2017. Environmental performance indicators as the key for eco-industrial parks in Thailand. J. Clean. Prod. 156, 614–623.
Port Of Rotterdam 2017. Sustainability Report. https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/our-port/our-themes/a-sustainable-port/sustainability
Port Of Santos. 2016. Sustainability Report. https://www.santosbrasil.com.br/en/downloads/relatorio_sustentabilidade_2016.pdf
Port Of Shanghai. 2016. Sustainability Report. https://ports.coscoshipping.com/en/Sustainability/ReportsonSustainability/pdf/E_Corporate2016.pdf
Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., Darbra, R.M., 2014. Identification and selection of Environmental Performance Indicators for sustainable port development. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 81, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.02.006
Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., Michail, A., Darbra, R.M., 2015. Current status and trends of the environmental performance in European ports. Environ. Sci. Policy 48, 57–66.
Ragheb, A., El-Shimy, H., Ragheb, G., 2016. Green architecture: A concept of sustainability. Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 216, 778–787.
Ras, P.J., Vermeulen, W.J. V., 2009. Sustainable production and the performance of South African entrepreneurs in a global supply chain. The case of South African table grape producers. Sustain. Dev. 17, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.427
Reefke, H., Sundaram, D., 2017. Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management – identification and evaluation. Omega (United Kingdom) 66, 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.02.003
Roos, E.C., Kliemann Neto, F.J., 2017. Tools for evaluating environmental performance at Brazilian public ports: Analysis and proposal. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 115, 211–216.
Salsas, J., Saurí, S., Rúa, C., & Torrent, J. (2022). Conceptualisation of the Port of the Future based on the Business Canvas Model: Case study of the Vision 2040 for Barcelona. Case Studies On Transport Policy, 10(2), 1427-1437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.05.002
Santos, S., Rodrigues, L.L., Branco Branco, M.C., 2016. Online sustainability communication practices of European seaports. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 2935–2942.
Searcy, C., 2008. The Role of Sustainable Development Indicators in Corporate Decision-making. URL https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/role_of_sustainability_indicators.pdf (accessed 8.19.20).
Seguí, X., Puig, M., Quintieri, E., Wooldridge, C., Darbra, R.M., 2016. New environmental performance baseline for inland ports: A benchmark for the European inland port sector. Environ. Sci. Policy 58, 29–40.
Seinre, E.; Kurnitski, J.; Voll, H. Building sustainability objective assessment in Estonian context and a comparative evaluation with LEED and BREEAM. Building And Environment, [s.l.], v. 82, p.110-120, dez. 2014.
Shan, M., Hwang, B. gang, 2018. Green building rating systems: Global reviews of practices and research efforts. Sustain. Cities Soc.
Shiau, T.A., Chuang, C.C., 2015. Social construction of port sustainability indicators: a case study of Keelung Port. Marit. Policy Manag. 42, 26–42.
Silva, F., & Rocha, C. (2012). A demand impact study of southern and southeastern ports in Brazil: An indication of port competition. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 14(2), 204-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2012.4
Song, D.W., Parola, F., 2015. Strategising port logistics management and operations for value creation in global supply chains. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl.
Suzer, O., 2015. A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: LEED vs other major certification systems. J. Environ. Manage. 154, 266–283.
Tai, H., & Chang, Y. (2022). Reducing pollutant emissions from vessel maneuvering in port areas. Maritime Economics & Logistics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00218-w.
UN, 2020. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. URL https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/The-Sustainable-Development-GoalsReport-2020.pdf (accessed 8.19.20).
Valois, N.A.L., 2009. Proposição Do Uso De Indicadores Ambientais Na Avaliação De Desempenho De Portos Brasileiros (Master's thesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. URL https://attena.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/5369 (accessed 8.19.20).
Walker, T.R., Adebambo, O., Del Aguila Feijoo, M.C., Elhaimer, E., Hossain, T., Edwards, S.J., Morrison, C.E., Romo, J., Sharma, N., Taylor, S., Zomorodi, S., 2019. Environmental effects of marine transportation, in: World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation Volume III: Ecological Issues and Environmental Impacts. Elsevier, pp. 505–530.
Woo, J.K., Moon, D.S.H., Lam, J.S.L., 2018. The impact of environmental policy on ports and the associated economic opportunities. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 110, 234–242.
WORLD PORTS SUSTAINABILITY REPORT (2020). https://sustainableworldports.org/wp-content/uploads/WORLD-PORTSSUSTAINABILITY-REPORT-2020-FIN.pdf
Wu, P., Song, Y., Shou, W., Chi, H., Chong, H. Y., Sutrisna, M. 2017. A comprehensive analysis of the credits obtained by LEED 2009 certified green buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 370-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.007
Wu, P., Xia, B., Pienaar, J., Zhao, X. 2014a. The past, present and future of carbon labelling for construction materials–a review. Building and Environment, 77, 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.023
Wu, P., Xia, B., Zhao, X. 2014b. The importance of use and end-of-life phases to the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of concrete–a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 37, 360-369.
Xie, B., Zhang, X., Lu, J., Liu, F., & Fan, Y., 2022. Research on ecological evaluation of Shanghai port logistics based on emergy ecological footprint models. Ecological Indicators, 139, 108916. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108916
Yang, Y.C., 2017. Operating strategies of CO2 reduction for a container terminal based on carbon footprint perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 472–480.
Zhang, Y., Kim, C.W., Tee, K.F., Lam, J.S.L., 2017. Optimal sustainable life cycle maintenance strategies for port infrastructures. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 1693–1709.
Zhu, M., Li, K.X., Shi, W., Lam, J.S.L., 2017. Incentive policy for reduction of emission from ships: A case study of China. Mar. Policy 86, 253–258.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Stephane Louise Boca Santa, Walter Leal Filho, Gisele Mazon, Maria Gabriela Mendonça Peixoto, Luíza Luchi de Paulo Gewehr, Brenda Carolyne Geraldo Castro , Suzane Carolyne Gorges, Thiago Coelho Soares , José Baltazar Osório Salgueirinho Andrade de Guerra
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
O autor deve garantir:
- que haja um consenso completo de todos os coautores em aprovar a versão final do documento e sua submissão para publicação.
- que seu trabalho é original, e se o trabalho e/ou palavras de outras pessoas foram utilizados, estas foram devidamente reconhecidas.
Plágio em todas as suas formas constituem um comportamento antiético de publicação e é inaceitável. RCA reserva-se o direito de usar software ou quaisquer outros métodos de detecção de plágio.
Todas as submissões recebidas para avaliação na revista RCA passam por identificação de plágio e autoplágio. Plágios identificados em manuscritos durante o processo de avaliação acarretarão no arquivamento da submissão. No caso de identificação de plágio em um manuscrito publicado na revista, o Editor Chefe conduzirá uma investigação preliminar e, caso necessário, fará a retratação.
Os autores cedem à RCA os direitos exclusivos de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons (CC BY) 4.0 Internacional.
Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada neste periódico (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional, em site pessoal, publicar uma tradução, ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial neste periódico.
Esta licença permite que qualquer usuário tenha direito de:
Compartilhar – copiar, baixar, imprimir ou redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato.
Adaptar – remixar, transformar e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
De acordo com os seguintes termos:
Atribuição – Você deve dar o crédito apropriado (citar e referenciar), prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de maneira alguma que sugira ao licenciante apoiar você ou o seu uso.
Sem restrições adicionais – Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.
