Academic activity management system: an analysis from the perspective of intention, use and performance at the Centro Federal de Educação Tecnologica de Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2024.e89525Keywords:
Integrated Management System, SIGAA, UTAUT, Individual Performance, Educational InstitutionsAbstract
Goal: to analyze whether the intention and use of the Integrated Academic Activities Management System (SIGAA) has a positive effect on individual user performance, from the perspective of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), at the Federal Technological Education Center of Minas Gerais (CEFET-MG).
Methodology/approach: the research typology is causal, quantitative, qualitative and a case study, through the application of questionnaires to professors and administrative staff. The quantitative analysis of the results shows the users' perceptions through the Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient and the validation of the constructs through the Average Ranking of the items within each block of the questionnaire applied.
Originality/relevance: this is an original study as it seeks to understand individual performance associated with the acceptance of academic management software, using an already consolidated theory (UTAUT).
Main findings: the results show that the acceptance and use of the SIGAA system has a significant effect on the individual performance of its user, but this is not exceptional, given that the system is a tool that is made available for use and facilitates the operation of records.
Theoretical contributions: the model resulting from this research, with the inclusion of the performance construct in the UTAUT, makes a theoretical and methodological contribution to other research with the same purpose.
Management contributions: The study provided suggestions for possible improvements to be implemented in academic activities management systems, given their importance for educational institutions.
References
Abrucio, F. L., & Gaetani, F. (2008). Avanços e perspectivas da gestão pública nos estados: agenda, aprendizado e coalizão. In L. L. Costa (Org.), Avanços e perspectivas da gestão pública nos estados (pp. 1-270). Ed. Qualitymark. http://bresserpereira.sitepessoal.com/Documents/MARE/Terceiros-Papers/Texto%20de%20Abrucio%20e%20de%20Gaetani.pdf
Afonso, C. M., Roldán, J. L., Sánchez-Franco, M., & Gonzalez, M. O. (2012). The moderator role of gender in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): A study on users of Electronic Document Management Systems. Proceedings of the 7th PLS Conference (pp. 1-8). Houston, Texas. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267267421_The_moderator_role_of_Gender_in_the_Unified_Theory_of_Acceptance_and_Use_of_Technology_UTAUT_A_study_on_users_of_Electronic_Document_Management_Systems
Ajzen, I. (1991). Organizational behavior and human decision processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/074959789190020T#!
Alexandre, L., & Neves, B. (2018). Modelo de Equações Estruturais: uma introdução aplicada. ENAP.
Ayaz, A., & Yanartaş, M. (2020). An analysis on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology theory (UTAUT): Acceptance of electronic document management system (EDMS). Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2, e100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100032
Barquette, S., & Chaoubah, A. (2007). Pesquisa de marketing. Saraiva. https://livrariapublica.com.br/pesquisa-de-marketing-stael-barquette-alfredo-chaoubah/
Batista, R. C. S., Silva, D. R. M. P., Matos, D. G. B. C., & Nantes, M. R. A. (2019). Implantação do Sistema Eletrônico de Informações em uma Universidade Federal da Amazônia Ocidental: Sob a visão da Teoria Unificada de Aceitação e uso da Tecnologia. Proceedings of the 19º Colóquio Internacional de Gestão Universitária (pp. 1-15). UFSC, Florianópolis, Brazil. https://repositorio.enap.gov.br/handle/1/3334https://repositorio.enap.gov.br/handle/1/3334
Bendassolli, P. F. (2017). Desempenho no trabalho: revisão da literatura. Psicologia Argumento, 30(68), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.7213/psicol.argum.5895
Bernardes, J. F., & Abreu, A. F. DE. (2004). A contribuição dos sistemas de informações na gestão universitária [Conference presentation]. Anais do IV Colóquio Internacional sobre Gestão Universitária na América do Sul, Florianópolis, Brazil. http://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/35705
Brito, K. L., & Tonelli, A. O. (2019). Determinantes do desempenho no uso do Sistema Eletrônico de Informação (SEI) no IFMG: Um estudo a partir dos modelos D&M/TTF e UTAUT/TTF [Bachelor's Thesis, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais]. Formiga Campus Repository. http://docplayer.com.br/150265245-Palavras-chave-modelos-de-aceitacao-de-tecnologia-smartpls-utaut-ttf-sei.html
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
Cavalcante, G. M., Ceolin, A. C., & Barros, J. E. M. (2018). Aceitação e uso do Sistema Integrado de Patrimônio, Administração e Contratos (Sipac). Revista Gestão Organizacional, 11(2), 79-96. https://bell.unochapeco.edu.br/revistas/index.php/rgo/article/view/4532
Cavalcante, G. M., Ceolin, A. C., & Barros, J. E. M. (2018). Aceitação e uso do Sistema Integrado de Patrimônio, Administração e Contratos (SIPAC). Revista Gestão Organizacional, 11(2), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.22277/rgo.v11i2.4532
Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais [CEFET-MG]. (2017). Processos administrativos do CEFET-MG se tornam cada vez mais digitais. CEFET-MG. https://www.ng.cefetmg.br/2017/10/02/processos-administrativos-do-cefet-mg-se-tornam-cada-vez-mais-digitais/
Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais [CEFET-MG]. (2021). Relatório da Secretaria de Gestão de Pessoas. SEGEP/CEFET-MG. https://www.segep.cefetmg.br/informacao/
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. http://cda.psych.uiuc.edu/psychometrika_highly_cited_articles/cronbach_1951.pdf
Dube, T., Van Eck, R., & Zuva, T. (2020). Review of technology adoption models and theories to measure readiness and acceptable use of technology in a business organization. Journal of Information Technology and Digital World, 2(4), 207-212. https://doi.org/10.36548/jitdw.2020.4.003
Godoy, A. S. (1995). Introdução à pesquisa qualitativa e suas possibilidades. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 35(2), 57-63. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rae/v35n2/a08v35n2.pdf
Gomes, J. Z. (2016). Aceitação de um sistema de apoio à manufatura: um estudo de caso na Empresa Marcopolo S/A [Master's Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul]. Porto Alegre Campus Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/96845
Hanashiro, D. M. M., Teixeira, M. L. M., & Zaccarelli, L. M. (2007). Gestão do fator humano: uma visão baseada em Stakeholders. Saraiva. https://acervo.enap.gov.br/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=25999
Henemann, J. S., & Gonçalves, G. C. (2014). Avaliação de desempenho: desafios e dificuldades na utilização da ferramenta no setor público [Conference presentation]. Annual convention of Encontro da ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. http://www.anpad.org.br/admin/pdf/2014_EnANPAD_APB1574.pdf
Kabra, G., Ramesh, A., Akhtar, P., & Dash, M. K. (2017). Understanding behavioural intention to use information technology: Insights from humanitarian practitioners. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1250-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.010
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 6, 1-11. https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2
Lima, T. P., Benevides, S. L. M., Watanabe, C. Y. V., Silva, R. M. P., & Rodrígues, T. D. M. (2016). Aplicação da Teoria UTAUT no Processo de Implantação de um Sistema de Informação para Assistência Estudantil [Conference presentation]. Anais do Congresso Nacional de Mestrados Profissionais em Administração Pública, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. http://www.profiap.org.br/profiap/eventos/2016/i-congresso-nacional-de-mestrados-profissionais-em-administracao-publica/anais-do-congresso/41446.pdf
Malanovicz, A. V. (2018). Compartilhamento de sentido ao traduzir objetivos da organização em sistemas de informação. Reuna, 23(4), 83-106.
Malhota, N. (2012). Pesquisa de Marketing: uma orientação aplicada (6ª ed.). Bookman.
Marchewka, J. T., & Liu, C. (2007). An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93-104. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/ciima/vol7/iss2/10/
Mutaqin, K. A., & Sutoyo, E. (2020). Analysis of Citizens Acceptance for e-Government Services in Bandung, Indonesia: The Use of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model. Bulletin of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 1(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.25008/bcsee.v1i1.3)
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
Omelczuk, I., & Stallivieri, L. (2019). Tecnologias da informação na gestão universitária: O plano diretor da tecnologia da informação e comunicação da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(2), 1794-1808. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/190497
Pace, E. S. U., Basso, L. F. C., & Silva, M. A. (2003). Indicadores de desempenho como direcionadores de valor. Revista de Administração Contemporânea,7 (1), 37-65. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-65552003000100003
Przeybilovicz, E., Cunha, M. A., & Meirelles, F. S. (2018). O uso da tecnologia da informação e comunicação para caracterizar os municípios: quem são e o que precisam para desenvolver ações de governo eletrônico e smart city. Revista de Administração Pública, 52(4), 630-649. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612170582
Rabaa’i, A. A. (2017). The use of UTAUT to investigate the adoption of E-government in Jordan: A cultural perspective. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 24(3), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2017.10002806)
Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Biographical memoirs: Lee J. Cronbach. Washington, DC-USA. American Philosophical Society, 147(4), 379-385. https://www.academia.edu/18670055/Lee_J_Cronbach
Silva, L. D., & Barbosa, R. R. (2020). Sistema Eletrônico De Informações (SEI): Uma análise da viabilidade de implantação nas diversas organizações públicas brasileiras. Revista Artigos.Com, 16, 1-11. https://acervomais.com.br/index.php/artigos/article/view/3241/1856
Souza, M. N. A., & Monteiro, A. J. (2015). Os docentes da Universidade Federal do Ceará e a utilização de alguns dos recursos do sistema integrado de gestão de atividades acadêmica (SIGAA). Ensaio, 23(88), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362015000300004
Souza, M. N. A., & Monteiro, A. J. (2015). Os docentes da Universidade Federal do Ceará e a utilização de alguns dos recursos do sistema integrado de gestão de atividades acadêmica (SIGAA). Ensaio, 23(88), 611–630. https://www.scielo.br/j/ensaio/a/jQCjnf5wPHmywfyKvSSDWcN/?lang=pt
Souza, V. W. O. M., Gomes, V. A. P., Pozo, O. V. C., & Freitas, R. R. (2020). Análise da Implementação dos Processos Administrativos Eletrônicos no Brasil após a Lei de Acesso à Informação. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção, 6(2), 15-23. https://periodicos.ufes.br/bjpe/article/view/29103/20661)
Sprague, R. H. (1995). Electronic Document Management: Challenges and Opportunities for Information Systems Managers. MIS Quarterly, 19(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/249710
Sternad, S., & Bobek, S. (2013). Impacts of TAM-based External Factors on ERP Acceptance. Procedia Technology, 9, 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.004
Stevenson, W. J. (2001). Estatística aplicada a administração. Ed. Harbra.
Titah, R., & Barki, H. (2006). E-Government Adoption and Acceptance: A Literature Review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(3), 23-57. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220526940_E-Government_Adoption_and_Acceptance_A_Literature_Review
Tjaden, G. S. (1996). Measuring the information age business. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329608524248
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
Zhu, K., Kraemer, K., & Xu, S. (2003). Electronic business adoption by European firms: A cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 251-268. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000475
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Flávia de Paula Dias, Danilo de Melo Costa, Eliana Márcia Martins Fittipaldi Torga, Roberta de Cássia Macedo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must ensure:
- that there is complete consensus among all co-authors to approve the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
- that their work is original, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, these have been duly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. RCA reserves the right to use software or any other methods of plagiarism detection.
All submissions received for evaluation in the RCA journal are screened for plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Plagiarism identified in manuscripts during the evaluation process will result in the submission being archived. In the event of plagiarism being identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, retract it.
Authors grant RCA exclusive rights of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons (CC BY) 4.0 International License.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publishing a translation, or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This license grants any user the right to:
Share – copy, download, print, or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
Attribution – You must give appropriate credit (cite and reference), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions – You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
