Identificar el impacto del apoyo de stakeholders y de la alta dirección en la configuración de la innovación ambiental, el desarrollo de productos ecológicos y el desempeño ambiental en la industria del plástico de Brasil y Portugal

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2024.e97177

Palabras clave:

Innovación estratégica ambiental, Presión de las partes interesadas, Innovación de productos ecológicos, Apoyo a la alta dirección, Rendimiento ambiental

Resumen

Objetivo: Identificar la influencia de las partes interesadas y el apoyo de la alta dirección en la estrategia de innovación ambiental, la innovación de productos verdes y el desempeño ambiental en el contexto de la industria del plástico en Brasil y Portugal.

Metodología/enfoque: Se realizó una encuesta a 94 empresas del sector, utilizando Mínimos Cuadrados Parciales (PLS) para el análisis de datos.

Originalidad/relevancia: El estudio contribuye a las lagunas en la influencia de la alta dirección y, principalmente, de los actores externos sobre las estrategias e innovaciones relacionadas con la sostenibilidad en empresas de la industria del plástico en Brasil y Portugal.

Principales resultados: La presión de las partes interesadas y el apoyo de la alta dirección influyen positivamente en la estrategia de innovación ambiental, la innovación de productos verdes, y ambas innovaciones influyen en el desempeño ambiental de las empresas de la industria del plástico portuguesa y brasileña.

Contribuciones teóricas: Las implicaciones resaltan el impacto de elementos externos y empresas que influyen en la sostenibilidad ambiental, permitiendo una mayor calidad de vida y sostenibilidad a escala global.

Contribución a la gestión: Necesidad de alineación entre la alta dirección y las partes interesadas para las estrategias e innovaciones vinculadas a la sostenibilidad.

Biografía del autor/a

Marcelo Curth, Feevale University

Tiene un Doctorado en Administración por la Universidad de Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS), una Maestría en Administración y Negocios por la Universidad Católica de Rio Grande do Sul (PUC-RS), Postgrado en Administración y Marketing por la Universidade Gama Filho , Postgrado en Educación de la Facultad (SENAC-RS) y posgrado en Mentoría de Formación Docente (Universidad de Tampere - Finlandia) y Licenciado en Ciencias del Deporte por la Universidad Luterana de Brasil (ULBRA). Es profesor del PPG en Procesos y Manifestaciones Culturales en la Universidad Feevale, trabajando como investigador en el tema de Marketing: Identidad y Cultura. Profesor a nivel de pregrado y posgrado de materias sobre Marketing Estratégico, Marketing Relacional, Comportamiento del Consumidor, Gestión y Emprendimiento en Salud y Deporte. Coordinador de cursos a nivel de posgrado (Lato Sensu) en Gestión Deportiva y Entrenamiento y Prescripción del Ejercicio. Coordinador de proyectos de innovación en el área de Salud con agencias financiadoras. Responsable de programas y proyectos deportivos y de extensión. Coordinador temático de los GTT de Marketing Deportivo y Modelamiento de Negocios y Emprendimiento de la Asociación Brasileña de Gestión Deportiva (ABRAGESP). Actuando como Socio propietario de empresas de consultoría, asesoría y capacitación, brindando consultoría en estrategias de marketing en micro y pequeñas empresas.

Alzira Maria Ascensão Marques, Polytechnic of Leiria

Doctora en Organización y Gestión de Empresas, con especialidad en Estrategia y Comportamiento Organizacional, de la Facultad de Economía de la Universidad de Coimbra. Profesor coordinador del área científica de Marketing, en el departamento de Economía y Gestión de la ESTG, Politécnica de Leiria, miembro del CARME (Centro de Investigación Aplicada en Gestión y Economía) y evaluador de la A3ES (Agencia de Evaluación y Acreditación de la Educación Superior). 

Ítalo José de Medeiros Dantas, Universidade Feevale

Estudiante de doctorado en Procesos y Manifestaciones Culturales en la Universidad Feevale; Maestría en Diseño de la Universidad Federal de Campina Grande (2021); Especialista en Comunicación, Semiótica y Lenguajes Visuales de la Universidad Braz Cubas (2021); y licenciada en Diseño de Moda por el Instituto Federal de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología de Rio Grande do Norte (2019). Actualmente también cursa la Licenciatura en Sistemas de Información en la Universidade Potiguar. Fue profesor suplente en el área de procesos de gestión y control de calidad en la industria de la confección en el Instituto Federal de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología de Rio Grande do Norte - Campus Caicó entre los años 2022 y 2023. Su disertación fue seleccionada para Exposición en el 35º Premio de Diseño del Museu da Casa Brasileira, en la categoría de obra escrita inédita. Investigador multidisciplinario con intereses académicos y profesionales en diferentes áreas, con énfasis en Diseño, Moda y Estadística, trabajando principalmente en los siguientes temas: comunicación visual; morfología de artefactos; estudios empíricos; investigación de mercados, centrada en el consumo; inferencia estadística; y análisis de datos exploratorios.

Citas

Adomako, S., & Tran, M. D. (2022). Environmental collaboration, responsible innovation, and firm performance: The moderating role of stakeholder pressure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1695-1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2977

Aibar-Guzmán, C., & Somohano-Rodríguez, F. M. (2021). Do consumers value environmental innovation in product? Administrative sciences, 11(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010033

Associação Brasileira da Indústria do Plástico [Abiplast]. (2019). Perfil da indústria brasileira de transformação de material plástico 2019. São Paulo: Abiplast. Recuperado de http://www.abiplast.org.br/publicacoes/perfil2019/.

Associação Portuguesa da Indústria do Plástico [Apip]. (2020). O mundo dos plásticos. Recuperado de https://www.apip.pt/pt/mundo-dos-plasticos.

Amores-Salvadó, J., Martin-De Castro, G., & Navas-López, J. E. (2015). The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: a firm level approach to environmental and business performance benefits. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.004.

Barforoush, N., Etebarian, A., Naghsh, A., & Shahin, A. (2021). Green innovation a strategic resource to attain competitive advantage. International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(5), 645-663. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2020-0180

Borsatto, J. M. L. S., & Bazani, C. L. (2021). Regulamentações Ambientais e Competitividade: um estudo comparativo entre Brasil e França. Ciências da Administração, 23(60), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2021.e61944.

Borsatto, J. M. L. S., & Amui, L. B. L. (2019). Green innovation: unfolding the relation with environmental regulations and competitiveness. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.005

Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181(B), 384-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.006.

Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image – green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-1.

Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5.

Chu, S.-H., Yang, H., Lee, M., & Park, S. (2017). The impact of institutional pressures on green supply chain management and firms performance: Top management roles and social capital. Journal of Sustainability, 9(5), 764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050764.

Chung, Y., & Tsai, C. (2007). The effect of green design activities on new product strategies and performance: an empirical study among high-tech companies. International Journal of Management, 24(2), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050764.

Colwell, S. R., & Joshi, A. W. (2013). Corporate Ecological Responsiveness: Antecedent Effects of Institutional Pressure and Top Management Commitment and Their Impact on Organizational Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(2), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.732.

Cui, J., Dai, J., Wang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2022). Does environmental regulation induce green innovation? A panel study of Chinese listed firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121492

Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0.

De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy 41(3), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002.

Deng, H., Li, C., & Wang, L. (2022). The impact of corporate innovation on environmental performance: The moderating effect of financing constraints and government subsidies. Sustainability, 14(18), 11530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811530

Dijkstra, H., van Beukering, P., & Brouwer, R. (2020). Business models and sustainable plastic management: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120967.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategy and Management Journal. 21, 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E.

Euromonitor International (2020, abril 28). How is COVID-19 affecting the Top 10 Global Consumer Trends 2020? Recuperado de https://blog.euromonitor.com/webinar/how-is-covid-19-affecting-the-top-10-global-consumer-trends-2020/

Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron: University of Akron Press.

Fawcett, S.E., McCarter, M.W., Fawcett, A.M., Webb, G.S., & Magnan, G.M. (2015). Why supply chain collaboration fails: the socio-structural view of resistance to relational strategies. Supply Chain Management International Journal, 20, 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2015-0331.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.

Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: a new perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018.

Gosling, J., Jia, F., Gong, Y., & Brown, S. (2017). The role of supply chain leadership in the learning of sustainable practice: toward an integrated framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.029.

Griffin, M. A., Rafferty, A. E., & Mason, C. M. (2004). Who started this? Investigating different sources of organizational change. Journal of Business Psychology, 18(4), 555–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBU.0000028451.22685.a4.

Groot, W. J. & Borén, T. (2010). Life cycle assessment of the manufacture of lactide and PLA biopolymers from sugarcane in Thailand. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15(9), 970-984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0225-y.

Hair, Jr., J., Ringle, C., Gudergan, S., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4.

Hall, J., Matos, S., Silvestre, B., & Martin, M. (2011). Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: the evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(7), 1147-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.02.005.

Hamel G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review, 67(3), 63–76.

Hao, F., Zang, Y., Fan, B., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Environmental regulation promotes green development in China: from the perspective of technological innovation. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11, 1209650. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1209650

Hoejmose, S. U., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2012). “Green” supply chain management: the role of trust and top management in B2B and B2C markets. Industrial Marketing Management. 41(4), 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.008.

Hu, L., Chang, T. W., Lee, Y. S., Yen, S. J., & Ting, C. W. (2023). How Does Sustainable Leadership Affect Environmental Innovation Strategy Adoption? The Mediating Role of Environmental Identity. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(1), 894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010894

Javeed, S. A., Zhou, N., Cai, X., & Latief, R. (2022). How does corporate management affect green innovation via business environmental strategies? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1059842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1059842

Kahupi, I., Hull, C. E., Okorie, O., & Millette, S. (2021). Building competitive advantage with sustainable products – A case study perspective of stakeholders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125699

Khan, S. J., Dhir, A., Parida, V., & Papa, A. (2021). Past, present, and future of green product innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4081-4106. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2858

Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Reeves, M., & Goh, E. (2013). The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54, 69–73.

Kitsis, A. M., &. Chen, I. J. (2021). Do stakeholder pressures influence green supply chain Practices? Exploring the mediating role of top management commitment, Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128258.

Koch, D., & Sauer, A. (2024). Identifying and Dealing with Interdependencies and Conflicts between Goals in Manufacturing Companies’ Sustainability Measures. Sustainability, 16(9), 3817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093817

Kong, D., & Qin, N. (2021). Does environmental regulation shape entrepreneurship? Environmental and Resource Economics, 80(1), 169-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00584-8

Lai, K. H., Wong, C. W. Y., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). Ecological modernisation of Chinese export manufacturing via green logistics management and its regional implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(4), 766–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.10.004.

Lee, K. H. & Ball, R. (2003). Achieving sustainable corporate competitiveness: strategic link between top management’s (green) commitment and corporate environmental strategy. Greener Management International, 44, 89-103.

Lestari, E. R., Dania, W. A. P., Indriani, C., & Firdausyi, I. A. (2021, April). The impact of customer pressure and the environmental regulation on green innovation performance. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 733, No. 1, p. 012048). IOP Publishing.

Li, Z., Huang, Z., & Su, Y. (2023). New media environment, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 119, 106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106545

Linder, J. C., Jarvenpaa, S., & Davenport, T. H. (2003). Towards an innovative sourcing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 43-9.

Liu, F., Wang, R., & Fang, M. (2024). Mapping green innovation with machine learning: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123107

Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., Pacheco, R., Monteiro, E., & Santos, C. (2022). Drivers of sustainable innovation strategies for increased competition among companies. Sustainability, 14(9), 5471. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095471

Mady, K., Abdul Halim, M. A. S., Omar, K., Abdelkareem, R. S., & Battour, M. (2022). Institutional pressure and eco-innovation: The mediating role of green absorptive capacity and strategically environmental orientation among manufacturing SMEs in Egypt. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2064259. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2064259

Malhotra, N. (2010). Marketing research: an applied orientation. (6a ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.

Marôco, J. P. (2014). Análise de equações estruturais: fundamentos teóricos, software & Aplicações. (2a ed.). Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber.

Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., Çiğdem, Ş., Vasilis Vasiliauskas, A., & Yıldız, B. (2021). Green innovation in environmental complexity: The implication of open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020107

Meng, S., Wang, P., & Yu, J. (2022). Going abroad and going green: The effects of top management teams’ overseas experience on green innovation in the digital era. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14705. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214705

Narasimhan, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2012). The Effects of Integrated Supply Management and Environmental Management Practices on Relative Competitive Quality Advantage. International Journal of Production Research, 50(4), 1185-1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.555785.

Petruzzelli, A. M., Dangelico, R. M., Rotolo, D., & Albino, V. (2011). Organizational factors and technological features in the development of green innovations: evidence from patent analysis. Innovation, 13(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2011.13.3.291.

Podsakoff, P., & Organ, D. (1986). Self-Report in organizational research. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

Porter, M., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–133. Recuperado de https://hbr.org/1995/09/green-and-competitive-ending-the-stalemate

Pujari, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.006.

Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1780

Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological economics, 32(2), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3

Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655.

Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro‐environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1820.

Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.010.

Seman, N. A. A., Zakuan, N., Jusoh, A., Arif, M. S. M., & Saman, M. Z. M. (2012). The Relationship of Green Supply Chain Management and Green Innovation Concept. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, 453-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1211.

Singh, P. J., Mittal, V. K., & Sangwan, K. S. (2013). Development and validation of performance measures for environmentally conscious manufacturing. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 14(2),197-220. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2013.051829.

Tarigan, Z.J., Ch, N., Tanuwijaya, R., & Siagian, H. (2020). Does Top Management Attentiveness Affect Green Performance through Green Purchasing and Supplier Collaboration. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(4).

Tu, Y., & Wu, W. (2021). How does green innovation improve enterprises’ competitive advantage? The role of organizational learning. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 504-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.031

Silvestre, B. S. (2015). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.025.

Wang, N., Zhang, S. J., & Wang, W. (2022). Impact of environmental innovation strategy on green competitiveness: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 5879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105879

Williams, R. J., Morrell, D. L. & Mullane, J. V. (2014). Reinvigorating the mission statement through top management commitment. Management Decision, 52(3), 446-459. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2012-0736.

Wong, S. K.-M. (2012). The influence of green product competitiveness on the success of green product innovation: empirical evidence from the Chinese electrical and electronics industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 468-490. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272385.

Wu, B., Fang, H., Jacoby, G., Li, G., & Wu, Z. (2022). Environmental regulations and innovation for sustainability? Moderating effect of political connections. Emerging Markets Review, 50, 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100835

Xu, Y., Liu, W., Pu, R., & Xu, Y. (2021). Be green to be innovative: The role of government subsidies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 765100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.765100

Yang Spencer, S., Adams, C. & Yapa, P.W.S. (2013), The mediating effects of the adoption of an environmental information system on top management’s commitment and environmental performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(1), 75-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2011-0030.

Yang, L., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Environmental regulations and corporate green innovation in China: The role of city leaders’ promotion pressure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 7774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157774

Yu, W., & Ramanathan, R. (2016). Environmental management practices and environmental performance: the roles of operations and marketing capabilities. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(6), 1201-1222. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0380.

Yu, W., Ramakrishnan, R., & Nath, P. (2017). Environmental pressures and performance: an analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 117, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005.

Yusliza, M. Y., Norazmi, N. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., Fernando, Y., Fawehinmi, O. & Seles, B. M. R. P. (2019). Top management commitment, corporate social responsibility and green human resource management: A Malaysian study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(6), 2051-2078. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0283.

Zhou, J., Sawyer, L., & Safi, A. (2021). Institutional pressure and green product success: the role of green transformational leadership, green innovation, and green brand image. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 704855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704855.

Zhou, K., Tao, Y., Wang, S., & Luo, H. (2023). Does green finance drive environmental innovation in China? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(8), 2727-2746. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2190847

Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K-H. (2008). Green supply chain management implications for “closing the loop.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2006.06.003.

Publicado

2024-11-06

Cómo citar

Curth, M., Marques, A. M. A., & Dantas, Ítalo J. de M. (2024). Identificar el impacto del apoyo de stakeholders y de la alta dirección en la configuración de la innovación ambiental, el desarrollo de productos ecológicos y el desempeño ambiental en la industria del plástico de Brasil y Portugal. Revista De Ciencias De La Administración, 26(66), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2024.e97177

Artículos similares

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.