The use of abstracts and keywords in Social Sciences: an evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2008v13n26p78Keywords:
Abstracts, Keywords, Metadata, Information representation, Information retrievalAbstract
This study aims to make an evaluation of abstracts and keywords used in periodicals published by Brazilian authors in the area of Social Sciences, in order to identify the main characteristics of these practices and how they can affect the information retrieval and representation. About 151 abstracts written by professors of the University of São Paulo were evaluated, with a view to discovering how the authors use the types of abstracts (descriptive, informative or descriptive-informative); As a second topic, we examined keywords, in an attempt to analyse how these keywords complement the abstracts, and to see if keywords can be used as tools to represent concepts in related disciplines. The results showed that the Brazilian social scientistis perfer descriptive abstracts, and that, in spite of the lack of standards, the keywords they supply can be used as a complement to the abstracts, and as indicators of interdisciplinary relations. Our conclusion is that, in spite of the importance of abstracts and keywords as informational tools, they are not properly used in the Social Sciences, and this fact may have negative effects on information retrieval.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Aline Lima Gonçalves
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.