The interdomain in metric studies in Medicine: approximations between researcher’s speech and their scientific practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2019.e65348Keywords:
Metric Studies of Information, Medicine, Bibliometric analysis, Interdomains, Scientific Periodical ProductionAbstract
Objective: This research analyzes the interdomain of Metrics of Information (MSI) in Medicine, in order to recognize theoretically and empirically the relations of production represented there. It uses a set of 132 articles extracted from Scopus as a corpus of analysis, produced by the most representative Brazilian authors of the interdomain.
Method: As methodological modality it adopts the content analysis of the questionnaire answers applied to the authors representing this interdomain, to objectify their perceptions about their related research practices in MSI, as well as the scientific periodical production analysis. Thus, it apprehends their perceptions about the research activities that they have been carrying out in MSI. As results, it confronts the periodical scientific production of the authors with their answers to the questionnaire, describing the cohesion between their discourses and their scientific production practices.
Results: show self - knowledge related to the practices of researchers of MSI domain, bringing to light the nature of their difficulties in the development of their studies, that can be methodological, theoretical, or stemming from the absence of social recognition of incipient interdomain. It observes curricular limitations and opportunities of contribution from the field of MSI beyond the own field, as a fruitful interrelation especially in what concerns to the improvement of studies related to science management and evaluation for the field of Medicine.
Conclusions: Finally, it considers interdomain analysis as an opportunity to contribute or collaborate between fields to perform meta-surveys.
Downloads
References
BUFREM, L. S.; FREITAS, J. L. Interdomínios na literatura periódica científica da Ciência da Informação. DataGramaZero - Revista de Informação, Rio de Janeiro, v.16, n. 4, out. 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.dgz.org.br/ago15/F_I_art.htm>.
GLÄNZEL, W. Bibliometrics as a research field: a course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. 2003. Disponível em: <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.97.5311&rep=rep1&type=pdf>. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.
GRACIO, M. C. C; OLIVEIRA, E. F. T. A inserção e o impacto internacional da pesquisa brasileira em "Estudos Métricos" uma análise na base Scopus. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, v. 5, n. 1, 2012. Disponível em: <http://inseer.ibict.br/ancib/index.php/tpbci/article/view/71/113>.
HJØRLAND, B.; ALBRECHTSEN, H. Toward a new horizon in information. Society for Information Science and Technology, v.46, n.6, p.400-425,1995.
HJØRLAND, B. Domain Analysis. Knowledge Organization, v. 44, n. 6, p.436-464, nov. 2017. (Reviews of Concepts in Knowledge Organization).
LLOYD, C. As estruturas da História. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1995.
MATTOS, A. M.; JOB, I. A produção científica brasileira no periódico Scientometrics de 1978 até 2006. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, n. 26, 2º sem., p. 47-61, 2008.
PACKER, A. L. et al. SciELO: uma metodologia para publicação eletrônica. Revista Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 27, n. 2, p. 109-121, maio/ago. 1998.
PACKER, A. Os periódicos brasileiros e a comunicação da pesquisa nacional. Revista USP, São Paulo, n. 89, 2011. Disponível em: http://rusp.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-99892011000200004&lng=en&nrm=iso>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2015.
PEREIRA, J. C. R.; ESCUDER, M. M. L. The scenario of Brazilian health sciences in the period of 1981 to 1995. Scientometrics, v. 45, n.1, p. 95-105, 1999.
RODRIGUES, R. S.; QUARTIERO, E.; NEUBERT, P. Periódicos científicos brasileiros indexados na Web of Science e Scopus: estrutura editorial e elementos básicos. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, João Pessoa, v. 25, n. 2, p. 117-138, maio/ago. 2015.
SANTA, S.; HERRERO-SOLANA, V. Cobertura de la ciencia de América Latina y el Caribe en Scopus vs Web of Science, México, Investigación Bibliotecológica, México, v. 24, n. 52, p. 13-27, sep./dic., 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Juliana Lazzarotto Freitas, Leilah Santiago Bufrem, Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.